AveyP.C.DeschM.C. (2013) ‘What Do Policymakers Want from Us? Results of a Survey of Current and Former Senior National Security Decision Makers’, International Studies Quarterly58(2), pp. 227–246.
2.
BlatterJ.HaverlandA.M. (2012) Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
DuitA.GalazV. (2008) ‘Governance and Complexity: New Issues in Governance Theory’, Governance21, pp. 311–335.
4.
MyrdalG. (1969) Objectivity in Social Research, New York: Random House.
5.
PetersB.G.PierreJ.StokerG. (2010) ‘The Relevance of Political Science’ in MarshD.StokerG. (eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science (3rd edn), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 325–342.
RaginC.C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8.
SartoriG. (1997) Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes (2nd edn), New York: New York University Press.
9.
ScharpfF.W. (2000) ‘Institutions in Comparative Policy Research’, Comparative Political Studies33, pp. 762–790.
10.
StokerG.PierreJ.PetersB.G. (forthcoming) The Relevance of Political Science, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
TsebelisG. (2000) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
WoodM. (2013) ‘Bridging the Relevance Gap in Political Science’, Politics34(3), pp. 275–286.