AveyP.C.DeschM.C. (2014) ‘What Do Policymakers Want from Us? Results of a Survey of Current and Former Senior National Security Decision Makers’, International Studies Quarterly58(2), pp. 227–246.
FlindersM. (2013) ‘The Tyranny of Relevance and the Art of Translation’, Political Studies Review11(2), pp. 149–167.
6.
HazellR.PaunA. (eds) (2009) Making Minority Government Work: Hung Parliaments and the Challenges for Westminster and Whitehall, London: Institute for Government/Constitution Unit.
7.
McCraeJ.StephenJ.GuermellouT.MehtaR. (2012) Improving Decision Making in Whitehall: Effective Use of Management Information, London: Institute for Government.
8.
PetersG.PierreJ.StokerG. (2010) ‘The Relevance of Political Science’ in MarshD.StokerG. (eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science (3rd edn), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 325–342.
9.
RiddellP.HaddonC. (2009) Transitions: Preparing for Changes of Government, London: Institute for Government.
10.
RutterJ. (2012) Evidence and Evaluation in Policy Making: A Problem of Supply or Demand?, London: Institute for Government.
11.
SilverN. (2012) The Signal and the Noise: The Art and Science of Prediction, London: Allen Lane.
12.
StephenJ.BouchalP.BullD. (2013) Whitehall Monitor 2013: Annual Commentary and Analysis on the Size, Shape and Performance of Whitehall, London: Institute for Government.
13.
StevensA. (2011) ‘Telling Policy Stories: An Ethnographic Study of the Use of Evidence in Policy-Making in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy40(2), pp. 237–255.
14.
TinklerJ. (2012) ‘The REF Doesn't Capture What Government Wants from Academics or How Academic Impact on Policymaking Takes Place’, LSE Impact of Social Science blog. 31 March. Available from: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/22129 [Accessed 27 January 2014].
15.
WeissC. (1979) ‘The Many Meanings of Research Utilization’, Public Administration Review39(5), pp. 426–431.
16.
WoodM. (2013) ‘Bridging the Relevance Gap in Political Science’, Politics34(3), pp. 275–286.