Few studies have examined the impact that the adoption of the secret ballot had on party system fragmentation outside the United States. This article tests arguments maintaining that the adoption of the secret ballot had a negative, positive or nil effect on party system fragmentation. Using time-series cross-sectional data from several countries adopting the secret ballot around the turn of the twentieth century the results demonstrate that the adoption of the secret ballot did not hinder – though did not favour, either – the development of multiparty systems.
BalandJ.-M.RobinsonJ.A. (2008) ‘Land and Power: Theory and Evidence from Chile’, American Economic Review98(5), pp. 1737–1765.
2.
BartoliniS.MairP. (1990) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885–1985.New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BeckN.KatzJ.N. (1995) ‘What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data’, American Political Science Review89(3), pp. 634–647.
4.
BishopG.F.FisherB.S. (1995) ‘“Secret Ballots” and Self-Reports in an Exit-Poll Experiment’, Public Opinion Quarterly59(4), pp. 568–588.
5.
CaramaniD. (2000) Elections in Western Europe since 1815: Electoral Results by Constituencies.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
CarstairsA.M. (1980) A Short History of Electoral Systems in Western Europe.London: Allen & Unwin.
7.
ChhibberP.K.KollmanK. (1998) ‘Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States’, American Political Science Review92(2), pp. 329–342.
8.
CoxG.W. (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems.New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CoxG.W.KousserJ.M. (1981) ‘Turnout and Rural Corruption: New York as a Test Case’, American Journal of Political Science25(4), pp. 646–663.
10.
CrookM.CrookT. (2007) ‘The Advent of the Secret Ballot in Britain and France, 1789–1914: From Public Assembly to Private Compartment’, History92(308), pp. 449–471.
11.
DunleavyP.BoucekF. (2003) ‘Constructing the Number of Parties’, Party Politics9(3), pp. 291–315.
12.
ElklitJ. (2010) ‘Denmark’ in NohlenD.StoverP. (eds.), Elections in Europe: A Data Handbook.Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 501–564.
13.
EvansE.C. (1917) AHistory of the Australian Ballot System in the United States.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
FloraP.AlberJ.EichenbergR.KohlJ.KrausF.PfenningW.SeebohmK. (1983) State, Economy and Society in Western Europe, 1815–1975: A Data Handbook in Two Volumes.Chicago, IL: St James Press.
15.
GainesB.J. (1999) ‘Duverger's Law and the Meaning of Canadian Exceptionalism’, Comparative Political Studies32(7), pp. 835–861.
16.
GerberA.HuberG.A.DohertyD.DowlingC.M. (2013) ‘Is There a Secret Ballot? Ballot Secrecy Perceptions and Their Implications for Voting Behaviour’, British Journal of Political Science43(1), pp. 77–102.
17.
HarveyA.MukherjeeB. (2006) ‘Electoral Institutions and the Evolution of Partisan Conventions, 1880–1940’, American Politics Research34(3), pp. 368–398.
18.
HeckelmanJ.C. (1995) ‘The Effect of the Secret Ballot on Voter Turnout Rates’, Public Choice82(1–2), pp. 107–124.
19.
HeckelmanJ.C. (1998) ‘Bribing Voters without Verification’, Social Science Journal35(3), pp. 435–443.
20.
HiranoS.SnyderJ.N. (2007) ‘The Decline of Third-Party Voting in the United States’, Journal of Politics69(1), pp. 1–16.
21.
HurstM. (1965) ‘Ireland and the Ballot Act of 1872’, Historical Journal8(3), pp. 326–352.
22.
KamC. (forthcoming) ‘Enfranchisement, Malapportionment and Electoral Responsiveness in Great Britain, 1832–1868’, Legislative Studies Quarterly..
23.
KatzJ.N.SalaB.R. (1996) ‘Careerism, Committee Assignments and the Electoral Connection’, American Political Science Review90(1), pp. 21–33.
24.
LaaksoM.TaageperaR. (1979) ‘The ‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies12(1), pp. 3–27.
25.
LakemanE. (1970) How Democracies Vote: A Study of Electoral Systems (3rd edn). London: Faber & Faber.
26.
Lewis-BeckM.SquireP. (1995) ‘The Politics of Institutional Choice: Presidential Ballot Access for Third Parties in the United States’, British Journal of Political Science25(3), pp. 57–81.
27.
LipsetS.M.RokkanS. (1967) ‘Introduction’ in LipsetS.M.RokkanS. (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives.New York: Free Press, pp. 1–67.
28.
NohlenD.StoverP. (eds.) (2010) Elections in Europe: A Data Handbook.Baden-Baden: Nomos.
29.
RanneyA. (1975) Curing the Mischiefs of Faction: Party Reform on America.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
RokkanS. (1961) ‘Mass Suffrage, Secret Voting and Political Participation’, European Journal of Sociology2(1), pp. 132–152.
31.
RuskJ.G. (1970) ‘The Effect of the Australian Ballot Reform on Split Ticket Voting, 1876–1908’, American Political Science Review64(4), pp. 1220–1238.
32.
SchafferF.C. (2002) ‘Might Cleaning Up Elections Keep People Away from the Polls? Historical and Comparative Perspectives’, International Political Science Review23(1), pp. 69–84.
33.
SchraufnagelS. (2011) Third Party Blues: The Truth and Consequences of Two-Party Dominance.New York: Routledge.
34.
SchraufnagelS.MilitiaK. (2010) ‘The Partisan Duopoly in US House Elections: An Analysis of Minor Party Failure’, Representation46(2), pp. 241–253.
35.
SquireP.HammK.E.HedlundR.D.MoncriefG.F. (2005) ‘Electoral Reforms, Membership Stability and the Existence of Committee Property Rights in American State Legislatures’, British Journal of Political Science35(1), pp. 169–181.
36.
StokesS. (2013) ‘What Killed Vote-Buying in Britain and the United States?’ in StokesS.C.DunningT.C.NazarenoM.BruscoV. (eds.), Buying Votes: Distributive Politics in Democracies.New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 200–244.
37.
StollH. (2013) Changing Societies, Changing Party Systems.New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
TaageperaR. (1997) ‘Effective Number of Parties for Incomplete Data’, Electoral Studies16(2), pp. 145–151.
39.
TaageperaR.ShugartM.S. (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
WalkerL.D. (2005) ‘The Ballot as Party System Switch: The Role of the Australian Ballot in Party System Change and Development in the USA’, Party Politics11(2), pp. 217–241.
41.
WareA. (2000) ‘Anti-Partism and Party Control of Political Reform in the United States: The Case of the Australian Ballot’, British Journal of Political Science30(1), pp. 1–29.
42.
WittrockJ.N.NemethS.C.SanbornH.DiSarroB.SquireP. (2008) ‘The Impact of the Australian Ballot on Member Behavior in the US House of Representatives’, Political Research Quarterly61(3), pp. 434–444.
43.
ZiblattD. (2008) ‘Does Landholding Inequality Block Democratization? A Test of the “Bread and Democracy” Thesis and the Case of Prussia’, World Politics60(4), pp. 610–641.
