This article addresses ‘resilience’ as ‘governmentality’. Three key ‘forms’ of resilience are identified: organisational, technological and community. A focus on community resilience shows that both positive and negative forms of governmentality are possible. The positive aligns well with progressive approaches to participatory governance. The negative, emerging from the prioritisation of organisational and technological concerns, aligns well with state-centric and neoliberal tactics of crime control and citizen responsibility. This article interrogates the tension between positive and negative forms of resilience as governmentality through the lens of the UK riots in 2011.
AlexanderD. (2005) ‘Towards the Development of a Standard in Emergency Planning’, Disaster Prevention and Management14(2), pp. 158–175.
2.
BakerS.A. (2012) ‘From the Criminal Crowd to the Mediated Crowd: The Impact of Social Media on the 2011 English Riots’, Safer Communities11(1), pp. 40–49.
3.
BoinA.McConnellA. (2007) ‘Preparing for Critical Infrastructure Breakdowns: The Limits of Crisis Management and the Need for Resilience’, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management15(1), pp. 50–59.
4.
BulleyD.Soki-BulleyB. (2012) ‘Big Society as Big Government: Cameron's Governmentality Agenda’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, doi: 10.1111/j.1467–856X.2012.00547.
Community and Victims Panel on the Riots (2011) 5 Days in August: Interim Report on the 2011 British Riots, London: Riots, Communities and Victims Panel.
13.
Community and Victims Panel on the Riots (2012) After the Riots: Final Report of the Riots, Community and Victims Panel, London: Riots, Communities and Victims Panel.
14.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1980) A Thousand Plateaus, trans. MassumiB., London: Continuum.
15.
Della PortaD.FillieuleO. (2004) ‘Policing Social Protest’ in SnowD.SouleS.KriesiH. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, London: Blackwell, pp. 217–241.
Food and Agriculture Organization (2011) Measuring Resilience: A Concept Note on the Resilience Tool, Geneva: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization.
GrahamS. (ed.) (2009) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails, London: Routledge.
20.
GundersonL.H.HollingC.S. (eds.) (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, London: Island Press.
21.
GundersonL.H.PritchardL.J. (eds.) (2002) Resilience and the Behaviour of Large-Scale Systems, London: Island Press.
22.
HartmanK.I. (2011) ‘Police Use Flickr to Identify London Riot Suspects’, Digital Journal. Available from: http://digitaljournal.com/article/310141 [Accessed 9 August 2013].
23.
JarmanN.O'HalloranC. (2001) ‘Recreational Rioting: Young People, Interface Areas and Violence’, Child Care in Practice7(1), pp. 2–16.
24.
JosephJ. (2013) ‘Resilience as Embedded Neo-liberalism: A Governmentality Approach’, Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses1(1), pp. 38–52.
25.
LeadbeaterC. (2004) Personalisation through Participation: A New Script for Public Services, London: Demos.
26.
LeonardM. (2010) ‘What's Recreational about “Recreational Rioting”? Children on the Streets in Belfast’, Children and Society24(1), pp. 38–49.
27.
LeviM.MaguireM. (2012) ‘Something Old, Something New; Something Not Entirely Blue: Uneven and Shifting Modes of Crime Control’ in NewburnT.PeayJ. (eds.), Policing: Politics, Culture and Control, Oxford: Hart, pp. 195–218.
Metropolitan Police Service (2012) 4 Days in August: Strategic Review into the Disorder in August 2011, London: Metropolitan Police Service.
35.
MurphyB.L. (2007) ‘Locating Social Capital in Resilient Community-Level Emergency Management’, Natural Hazards4192, pp. 297–315.
36.
O'BrienG.ReidP. (2005) ‘The Future of UK Emergency Management: New Wine, Old Skin?’, Disaster Prevention and Management14(3), pp. 353–361.
37.
PatonD.JohnstonD. (eds.) (2006) Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Approach, Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
38.
QuarantelliE.L. (1988) ‘Assessing Disaster Preparedness Planning: A Set of Criteria and Their Applicability to Developing Countries’, Regional Develpment Dialogue9, pp. 48–69.
39.
RogersP. (2011a) ‘Development of Resilient Australia: Enhancing the PPRR Approach with Anticipation, Assessment and Registration of Risks’, Australian Journal of Emergency Management26(1), pp. 54–59.
40.
RogersP. (2011b) ‘Resilience and Civil Contingencies: Tensions in Northeast and Northwest UK (2000–2008)’, Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism6(2), pp. 91–107.
RogersP. (2012b) Resilience and the City: Change (Dis)order and Disaster, London: Ashgate.
43.
RogersP. (2013) ‘The Rigidity Trap in Global Resilience: Neoliberalisation through Principles, Standards, Benchmarks’, Globalizations10(3), pp. 383–396.
44.
RoseA. (2004) ‘Defining and Measuring Economic Resilience to Disasters’, Disaster Prevention and Management13(4), pp. 307–314.
45.
RoseN. (1999) ‘Inventiveness in Politics’, Economy and Society28(3), pp. 467–493.
46.
SheffiY. (2005) The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
SomaiyaR. (2011) ‘London Sees Twin Perils Converging to Fuel Riots’, New York Times, 7 August.
48.
StensonK. (1993) ‘Community Policing as a Governmental Technology’, Economy and Society22(3), pp. 373–389.
TickellA.PeckJ. (2003) ‘Making Global Rules: Gobalisation or Neoliberalisation’ in PeckJ.WaichungH. (eds.), Remaking the Global Economy, London: Sage, pp. 163–182.
51.
UK Resilience (2006) Communicating Risk Guidance, London: UK Resilience/HMSO.
52.
WalkerB.SaltD. (2006) Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World, Washington, DC: Island Press.
53.
WalkerC.BroderickJ. (2006) The Civil Contingencies Act 2004: Risk, Resilience and the Law in the United Kingdom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
WalkerJ.CooperM. (2011) ‘Genealogies of Resilience: From Systems Ecology to the Political Economy of Crisis Adaptation’, Security Dialogue42(2), pp. 143–160.
