In this article I evaluate the conceptions of politics and of ‘the political’ characteristic of ‘radical pluralism’. I argue that in order to comprehend the radically pluralist conception of politics it is necessary to grasp the post-structuralist critique of the philosophical principle of identity. The concern with the interface between politics and ethics – which is typical of the radical pluralist approach – is also explored. Throughout the article contrast is made with the conventional pluralism of American political science. I conclude with a consideration of the importance of radical pluralism, with reference to the difficulties this may present for the methods and suppositions of political science traditionally understood.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aristotle (1998), The Metaphysics, London: Penguin.
2.
BachrachP. and BaratzM. (1962), ‘Two Faces of Power’, American Political Science Review56(4), pp. 947–952.
3.
BentleyA. (1908), The Process of Government, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
BrownR. (1998), ‘Political Studies and Cultural Studies: A response to Finlayson and Martin’, Politics18(3), pp. 173–177.
5.
BrysonV. (1992), Feminist Political Theory: an Introduction, New York: Paragon House.
6.
BurnsT. (2000), ‘What is Politics? Robinson Crusoe, Deep Ecology and Immanuel Kant’, Politics20(2), pp. 93–98.
7.
ConnollyW.E. (1993), The Augustinian Imperative, London: Sage Publications.
8.
ConnollyW.E. (1995a), The Ethos of Pluralization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
ConnollyW.E. (1995b), ‘Twilight of the idols’, Philosophy and Social Criticism21(3).
10.
DahlR.A. (1958), ‘A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model’, American Political Science Review52(2), pp. 463–469.
11.
DahlR.A. (1961), Who Governs?, New Haven: Yale University Press.
12.
DahlR.A. (1980), ‘Pluralism Revisited’ in EhrlichS. and WoottonG. (eds.), Three Faces of Pluralism: Political, Ethnic and Religious, Farnborough: Gower.
13.
DahlR.A. and LindblomC.E. (1976), Politics Economics and Welfare, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
DerridaJ. (1976), Of Grammatology, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
DerridaJ. (1995), ‘Eating Well, or the Calculation of the subject’, in WeberE. (ed.), Points, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
16.
DunleavyP. and O'LearyB. (1987), Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy, London: Macmillan Education.
17.
FinlaysonA. and MartinJ. (1997), ‘Political Studies and Cultural Studies’, Politics17(3), pp. 183–189.
18.
HowarthD. (1998), ‘Post-Marxism’ in LentA. (ed.), New Political Thought: an Introduction, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
19.
KeaneJ. (1988), Democracy and Civil Society, London: Verso.
20.
LaclauE. (1990), New Reflections on the Revolutions of our Times, London: Verso.
21.
LaclauE. and MouffeC. (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London: Verso.
22.
LindblomC.E. (1982), ‘The Market as Prison’, The Journal of Politics44(2), pp. 324–336.
23.
LukesS. (1974), Power: a radical view, London: Macmillan.
24.
ManleyJ.F. (1983), ‘Neo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism I and Pluralism II’, The American Political Science Review77(2), pp. 368–383.
25.
MarshD. (1995), ‘The Convergence Between Theories of the State’ in MarshD. and StokerG. (eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
26.
MarshD. (1998), ‘Lets not Confuse Radical and Political Pluralism’, paper, unpublished.
27.
McClureK. (1992), ‘On the Subject of Rights: Pluralism, Plurality and Political Identity’, in MouffeC. (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy, London: Verso.
28.
McLennanG. (1995), Pluralism, Buckingham: The Open University Press.
29.
MouffeC. (1993a), ‘Liberal Socialism and Pluralism. Which Citizenship?’ in SquiresJ. (ed.), Principled Positions, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
30.
MouffeC. (1993b), The Return of the Political, London: Verso.
31.
MouffeC. (2000), The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso.
32.
PolsbyN. (1963), Community Power and Political Theory, New Haven: Yale University Press.
33.
SchmittC. (1996), The Concept of the Political, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
34.
SmithM.J. (1990), ‘Pluralism, Reformed Pluralism and Neopluralism: the Role of Pressure Groups in Policy Making’, Political StudiesXXXVIII(2), pp. 302–322.
35.
StatenH. (1984), Wittgenstein and Derrida, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
36.
TrumanD. (1962), The Governmental Process, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
37.
YoungI.M. (1990), Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.
38.
ZizekS. (1999), The Ticklish Subject, London: Verso.
