This article considers the nature of politics. Robinson Crusoe is used to show that even the broadest understanding of politics found in the literature is inadequate, for the situation of Crusoe on his island is a political situation even though he is completely alone. An analogy is drawn between the deep ecological understanding of politics and the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant. For Kantian ethics, also, is built on the idea of a solitary individual who is at least existentially isolated. It is concluded that what makes any situation political is the fact that in it some policy is required.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttfieldR. (1981), ‘The Good of Trees’, Journal of Value Inquiry15, pp. 35–54.
2.
AttfieldR. (1991), The Ethics of Environmental Concern, Athens, Ga. and London: University of Georgia Press.
3.
AttfieldR.BelseyA. (eds.) (1994), Philosophy and the Natural Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BrennanA.A. (1995), ‘Ecological Theory and Value in Nature’ in ElliotR. (ed.), Environmental Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 188–214.
5.
BroadieA.PybusE. (1974), ‘Kant's Treatment of Animals’, Philosophy49, pp. 375–383.
6.
CallicottJ.B. (1984), ‘Non-anthropocentric Value Theory and Environmental Ethics’, American Philosophical Quarterly21, pp. 299–309.
7.
CrickB. (1971), In Defence of Politics, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
8.
DobsonA. (1990), Green Political Thought, London: Unwin Hyman.
9.
DuvergerM. (1974), The Study of Politics, London: Nelson.
10.
ElliotR. (ed.) (1995), Environmental Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
FinlaysonA.MartinJ. (1997), ‘Political Studies and Cultural Studies’, Politics17(3), pp. 183–189.
12.
FoxW. (1986), Approaching Deep Ecology: A Response to Richard Sylvan's Critique of Deep Ecology, Tasmania: University of Tasmania Press.
13.
GoodpasterK. (1978), ‘On Being Morally Considerable’, Journal of Philosophy78, pp. 308–325.
14.
HagueR.HarropM.BreslinS. (1992 [1982]), Comparative Government and Politics, 3rd edn, London: Macmillan.
15.
HaywardT. (1994), ‘Kant and the Moral Considerability of Non-rational Beings’ in AttfieldR.BelseyA. (eds.), Philosophy and the Natural Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–141.
16.
HeywoodA. (1997), Politics, London: Macmillan.
17.
HoffC. (1983), ‘Kant's Invidious Humanism’, Environmental Ethics5, pp. 63–70.
18.
KantImmanuel (1972), The Moral Law: Kant's Groundwork for a Metaphysics of Morals, (ed.) PatonH.J., London: Hutchinson.
19.
LaskiH.J. (1931), An Introduction to Politics, London: Allen and Unwin.
20.
LeftwichA. (ed.) (1984), What is Politics? The Activity and its Study, Oxford: Blackwell.
21.
LukesS. (1981 [1974]), Power: A Radical View, London: Macmillan.
22.
MathewsF. (1996), ‘Value in Nature and Meaning in Life’ in ElliotR. (ed.), Environmental Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 142–154.
23.
MidgleyM. (1994), ‘The End of Anthropocentrism?’ in AttfieldR.BelseyA. (eds.), Philosophy and the Natural Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–112.
24.
MidgleyM. (1995), ‘Duties Concerning Islands’ in ElliottR. (ed.), Environmental Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–103.
25.
MillerJ.D.B. (1962), The Nature of Politics, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
26.
MouffeC. (1993), The Return of the Political, London: Verso Books.
27.
NaessA. (1984), ‘Intuition, Intrinsic Value and Deep Ecology’, The Ecologist14(5/6), pp. 201–203.
28.
PicklesD. (1964), Introduction to Politics, London: Methuen.
29.
RolstonH.III (1994), ‘Value in Nature and the Nature of Value’ in AttfieldR.BelseyA. (eds.), Philosophy and the Natural Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–30.
30.
SylvanR. (1984), ‘A Critique of Deep Ecology: Part One’, Radical Philosophy40, pp. 2–12.
31.
SylvanR. (1985), ‘A Critique of Deep Ecology: Part Two’, Radical Philosophy41, pp. 10–22.
32.
TaylorC.C. (ed.) (1992), Ethics and the Environment, Oxford: Corpus Christi College.
33.
TaylorP.W. (1986), ‘The Ethics of Respect for Nature’, Environmental Ethics3, pp. 197–218.
