Public choice theory has emphasized economic explanations of privatization decisions, while often neglecting the politics associated with the decision-making process. This research finds that the political context is important in understanding why American municipal governments decide whether or not to privatize a service. Four case studies reveal that the degree to which the decision-making process is politicized is a factor warranting our attention
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BuchananJames M. (1977), ‘Why Does Government Grow?’ in BorcherdingT. (ed.) Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth, Durham: Duke University Press.
2.
FerrisJames M. (1986), The Decision to Contract Out: An Empirical Analysis’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22, pp. 289–311.
3.
McGuireR.A.OhsfeldtR.L.Van CottT.N. (1987), ‘The Determinants of the Choice Between Public and Private Production of a Publicly Funded Service’, Public Choice, 54, pp. 211–230.
4.
MillerTerrel Anne (1988), ‘Contracting Out the Operations and Management of Local Hospitals: An Analysis of the Determinants of Local Government Choice’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
5.
MirandaRowanKarlynAndersen (1994), ‘Alternative Service Delivery in Local Government, 1982–1992’ in The Municipal Yearbook, 1994, Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
6.
MorganD.R.HirlingerM.W.EnglandRE. (1988), The Decision to Contract Out City Services: A Further Explanation’, Western Political Quarterly, 41, pp. 363–372.
7.
NiskanenWilliamA.Jr. (1971), Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
8.
TullockGordon (1977), ‘What is To Be Done?’ in BorcherdingT. (ed.) Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth, Durham: Duke University Press.
