Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article explores a neglected aspect of the wider debate about EU enlargement: bilateral disputes between a member state and an applicant, where the former uses, or threatens to use its membership status to block the applicant’s progress in order to resolve a bilateral dispute. Through analysis of three cases – Italy and Slovenia, Slovenia and Croatia, and Greece and Macedonia – we show that the EU’s transformative power does not always flow ‘outwards’ towards the state seeking membership. This raises interesting questions about enlargement as a process of international bargaining between sovereign states filtered via a supranational entity formally responsible for negotiations. The cases suggest limits to the EU’s transformative power in the context of disputes that are linked to the meaning and significance of borders. It is not surprising that the European Commission prefers disputes to be resolved bilaterally or via a third party.

Keywords

borders European Union enlargement South East Europe

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Society of International Law (ASIL) (1992) ‘European Community: Declaration on Yugoslavia and the Guidelines on the Regulation of New States’, International Legal Materials, 31 (6), 1485–7.

Andreev

S. A.

(2004) ‘The Borders in Southeast Europe: Democratic Legitimacy and Security Issues in an Enlarging European Union’, Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 4 (3), 379–98.

Arnaut

(2002) ‘Stormy Waters on the Way to the High Seas: The Case of Territorial Sea Delimitation between Croatia and Slovenia’, Journal of Ocean and Coastal Law, 21 (8), 1–39.

Avbelj

J. L.

Černic

J. L.

(2007) ‘The Conundrum of the Piran Bay: Slovenia versus Croatia – The Case of Maritime Delimitation’, Journal of International Law and Policy, 5 (2), 1–19.

Balkan Insight (2008a) ‘Slovenia’s Blocking Croatia’s EU Progress’, Balkan Insight, 16 October. Available from: http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/slovenia-blocks-croatia-s-eu-progress.

Balkan Insight (2008b) ‘Brussels Regrets Slovenia Veto on Croatia’s Bid’, Balkan Insight, 18 December. Available from: http://old.balkaninsight.com/en/main/news/15675/?tpl=297.

Balkan Insight (2009) ‘EU: Slovenia, Croatia Urged to Mediate’, Balkan Insight, 6 March. Available from: http://old.balkaninsight.com/en/main/news/17188/?tpl=297.

Balkan Report (2001) ‘Slovenia and Croatia Reach Border Agreement’, Balkan Report, 3 August. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1341147.html.

Balkan Report (2003) ‘Negative Slovenian Reaction to New Croatian Zone’, Balkan Report, 17 October. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1341040.html.

10.

Balkan Report (2004) ‘Slovenia and Croatia: The Politics of Division’, Balkan Report, 20 August. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1340991.html.

11.

Bartolini

(2004) Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Basta

(2014) ‘The State as a Symbol or a Means to an End: Internal Border Changes in Multinational Federations’, Nations and Nationalism, 20 (3), 458–80.

13.

Bechev

(2004) ‘Contested Borders, Contested Identity: The Case of Regionalism in Southeast Europe’, Southeast Europe and Black Sea Studies, 4 (1), 77–95.

14.

Bickterton

C. J.

(2012) European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

15.

Börzel

T. A.

Risse

(2012) ‘From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction’, West European Politics, 35 (1), 1–19.

16.

Brown

(2001) ‘Borders and Identity in International Political Theory’, in Albert

Jacobson

Lapid

(eds), Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 117–36.

17.

Cattaruzza

(2007) L’Italia e Il Confine Orientale. Bologna: Il Mulino.

18.

Christiansen

Petito

Tonra

(2004) ‘Fuzzy Politics around Fuzzy Borders: The European Union’s “Near Abroad”’, Cooperation and Conflict, 35 (4), 389–415.

19.

Corriere della Sera (1994) ‘Fini: Sulla Slovenia Niente Compromessi’, Corriere della Sera, 19 October, p. 5.

20.

Council of the European Union (CEC) (2008) Council of the European Union, Presidency Conclusions, 19–20 June. 11018/08 CONCL2, Brussels: European Commission.

21.

Council of the European Union (CEC) (2012) Border Arbitration Agreement between Slovenia and Croatia. MEMO/12/8, Brussels: European Commission.

22.

Council of the European Union (CEC) (2013) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Implementation of Reforms within the Framework of the High Level Accession Dialogue and the Promotion of Good Neighbourly Relations. COM(2013) 205 final, Strasbourg: European Commission.

23.

Deutsche Welle (2013) ‘Germany to Balkans: Drop Nationalist Rhetoric’, Deutsche Welle, 23 February. Available from: http://www.dw.de/germany-to-balkans-drop-nationalistic-rhetoric/a-16623276.

24.

Diez

Stetter

Albert

(2006) ‘The European Union and Border Conflicts: The Transformative Power of European Integration’, International Organization, 60 (3), 563–93.

25.

Fassino

(2003) Per Passione. Milan: Rizzoli.

26.

Flora

(ed.) (1999) State Formation, Nation-Building and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

27.

Friis

Murphy

(1999) ‘The EU and Central and Eastern Europe: Governance and Boundaries’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (2), 211–32.

28.

Geddes

Taylor

A. J.

(2013) ‘How EU Capacity Bargains Strengthen States: Migration and Border Security in South-East Europe’, West European Politics, 36 (1), 51–70.

29.

Gibler

D. M.

(2007) ‘Bordering on Peace: Democracy, Territorial Issues and Conflict’, International Studies Quarterly, 51 (3), 509–32.

30.

Gibler

D. M.

Jaroslav

(2014) ‘Territorial Peace and Democratic Clustering’, Journal of Politics, 76 (1), 27–40.

31.

Grabbe

(2006) The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

32.

Grabbe

(2014) ‘Six Lessons of Enlargement Ten Years On: The EU’s Transformative Power in Retrospect and Prospect’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52 (s1), 40–56.

33.

Hellenic Republic (n.d.) FYROM Name Issue. Athens: Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available from: http://www.mfa.gr/ en/FYROM-name-issue/ [Accessed 15 October 2013].

34.

International Court of Justice (ICJ) (2011) Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia v. Greece, Judgement, 5 December, The Hague: ICJ.

35.

International Crisis Group (ICG) (2011) Macedonia: Ten Years after the Conflict. Europe Report 215, Skopje: ICG.

36.

Kelley

J. G.

(2004) Ethnic Politics in Europe: The Power of Norms and Incentives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

37.

Klemenčić

Gosar

(2001) ‘The Problems of the Italo-Croat-Slovene Border Delimitation in the Northern Adriatic’, Geojournal, 52 (2), 129–37.

38.

Kuzmanovski

(2009) ‘What’s in a Name? You Wouldn’t Ask That Question If You Lived in Macedonia’, RFE/RL, 30 January. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/Macedonia__Where_The_Streets_Have_Greek_Names_/1376847.html.

39.

La Repubblica (1994) ‘Cade il veto sulla Slovenia. Roma e Lubiana trattano’, La Repubblica, 7 October, p. 12.

40.

Lavenex

Schimmelfennig

(2009) ‘EU Rules beyond EU Borders: Theorizing External Governance’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16 (6), 791–812.

41.

Linklater

(1998) The Transformation of Political Community. Cambridge: Polity Press.

42.

Mattli

(2002) ‘Sovereignty Bargains in Regional Integration’, International Studies Review, 2 (2), 149–80.

43.

Naegele

(1997) ‘Macedonia: Greek Minister’s Visit Signals Improvement in Relations’, RFE/RL, 9 March. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1083950.html.

44.

Newman

(2001) ‘Boundaries, Borders and Barriers: Changing Geographic Perspectives on Territorial Lines’, in Albert

Jacobson

Lapid

(eds), Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 137–52.

45.

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) (2008) NATO Council Bucharest Summit Declaration, 3 April. Brussels: NATO.

46.

O’Connor

(2012) ‘License to Bicker: Macedonian Number Plates Raise Greek Ire’, RFE/RL, 26 January. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/macedonian-number-plates-raise-greek-ire/24626570.html.

47.

Phillips

(2004) Macedonia: Warlords and Rebels in the Balkans. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

48.

RFE/RL (2005a) ‘Macedonian President Offers Formula to End Name Dispute with Greece’, RFE/RL Newsline,24 January. Available from: http://www.hri.org/news/balkans/rferl/2005/05-01-24.rferl.html.

49.

RFE/RL (2005b) ‘New Developments in Macedonia-Greek Name Row’, Balkan Report, 15 April. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1340941.html.

50.

RFE/RL (2007) ‘Macedonia Wins EU Support in Name Dispute’, RFE/RL, 6 June. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1143886.html.

51.

RFE/RL (2008) ‘Macedonia: Violence Mars General Elections’, RFE/RL, 1 June. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1144531.html.

52.

RFE/RL (2009a) ‘Macedonia’s Future at Stake in March Elections’, RFE/RL, 27 January. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/Macedonias_EU_Future_At_Stake_In_March_Elections/1375434.html.

53.

RFE/RL (2009b) ‘Greece Again Challenges Macedonia on EU Accession’, RFE/RL, 28 October. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/Greece_Again_Challenges_Macedonia_On_EU_Accession/1863435.html.

54.

RFE/RL (2011) ‘Greece Criticizes Macedonia over Alexander the Great Statue’, RFE/RL, 16 June. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/macedonia_alexander_the_great_statue_greece_dispute/24237371.html.

55.

RFE/RL News (2009) ‘Slovenia, Croatia Sign Border Arbitration Deal’, RFE/RL News, 4 November. Available from: http://www.rferl.org/content/Slovenia_Croatia_Sign_Border_Arbitration_Deal/1869476.html.

56.

Rich

(1993) ‘Recognition of States: The Collapse of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union’, European Journal of International Law, 4 (2), 36–65.

57.

Ruggie

J. G.

(1993) ‘Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations’, International Organization, 77 (1), 139–74.

58.

Rutherford

. (2014) ‘Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence’, PLoS ONE, 9 (5), e95660.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095660. Available from: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0095660.

59.

Sancin

(2010) ‘Slovenia-Croatia Border Disputes: From Drnovšek-Račan to Pahor-Kosor Agreement’, European Perspectives, 2 (2), 93–111.

60.

Schimmelfennig

Sedelmeier

(2004) ‘Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11 (4), 661–79.

61.

Smith

M. J.

(1996) ‘The European Union and a Changing Europe: Establishing the Borders of Order’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 34 (1), 5–28.

62.

Stroschein

(2012) Ethnic Struggle, Coexistence and Democratization in Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

63.

Taylor

A. J.

Geddes

Charles

(2012) The European Union and South East Europe: The Dynamics of Europeanization and Multilevel Governance. London: Routledge/UACES.

64.

Turk

(1993) ‘Recognition of States: A Comment’, European Journal of International Law, 4 (2), 66–71.

65.

UN (1993a) Security Council Resolution S/RES/817, 7 April. New York: United Nations.

66.

UN (1993b) General Assembly Resolution A/RES/47/225, 8 April. New York: United Nations.

67.

UN (1995) Greece and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Interim Accord, 13 September. UN Treaty Series Vol. 189. I-32193. New York: United Nations.

68.

Vachudova

M. A.

(2005) Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

69.

Walker

R. B. J.

(1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Those Who Knock on Europe’s Door Must Repent? Bilateral Border Disputes and EU Enlargement

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References