This article shows how extant theories on women’s representation in parties can only partially explain the Kurdish ethno-nationalist party’s exceptional level of women’s descriptive representation vis-à-vis the Turkish average. It demonstrates that women’s very high level of representation in the Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) can be better understood by examining the interaction between party-related and movement-related factors. Drawing on extensive empirical research, the study demonstrates that the party’s leftist ideology, along with the mobilisation strategies and needs of the movement, have had a decisive impact in creating the conditions for women’s self-assertion and their taking positions of power within the party, including the adoption and scrupulous implementation of a voluntary party gender quota. The study suggests that, in the case of parties closely tied to broader social movements, it is the relationship between the two organisations (party and movement), rather than just the former, that should be analysed. This is particularly evident in the case of ethno-nationalist parties that emanate from highly mobilised or even armed movements.
AslanS. (2011) ‘Everyday Forms of State Power and the Kurds in the Early Turkish Republic’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 43, 75–93.
2.
BaldezL. (2008) ‘Political Women in Comparative Democracies’, in WolbrechtC.BeckwithK.BaldezL. (eds), Political Women and American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–180.
3.
BasuA. (2008) ‘Women, Political Parties and Social Movements in South Asia’, in GoetzA. M. (ed.), Governing Women. London: Routledge, pp. 87–111.
4.
BauerG.TremblayM. (2011) Women in Executive Power: A Global Overview. London: Routledge.
5.
BayrakM. (2002) Geçmişten Günümüze Kürt Kadini. Ankara: Özge Yayinlari.
6.
BilgiliN. C. (2011) ‘Bridging the Gender Gap in Turkish Politics: The Actors Promoting Female Representation’, European Perspectives, 3 (2), 105–129.
7.
BombergE. (2005) Green Parties and Politics in the European Union. London: Routledge.
8.
CaglayanH. (2008a) Analar, Tanrıçalar,Yoldaşlar. Istanbul: Iletişim Yayınları.
CaglayanH. (2012) ‘From Kawa the Blacksmith to Ishtar the Godess: Gender Constructions in Ideological-Political Discourses of the Kurdish Movement in Post-1980 Turkey: Possibilities and Limits’, European Journal of Turkish Studies, 14, 2–23.
11.
CasierM.JongerdenJ. (2012) ‘Understanding Today’s Kurdish Movement: Leftist Heritage, Martyrdom, Democracy and Gender ’. Available from: http://ejts.revues.org/4656 [Accessed 26 April 2014].
12.
ChildsS. (2008) Women and British Party Politics. New York: Routledge.
13.
Davidson-SchmichL. K. (2006) ‘Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Länder, 1990–2000’, Party Politics, 12 (2), 211–232.
14.
EnloeC. (1990) Bananas, Beaces and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
FeijoM. D. C. (1998) ‘Democratic Participation and Women in Argentine’, in JaquetteJ. S.WolchikS. L. (eds), Women and Democracy: Latin America and Central Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 29–47.
16.
GokalpD. (2010) ‘A Gendered Analysis of Violence, Justice and Citizenship: Kurdish Women Facing War and Displacement in Turkey’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 33, 561–569.
17.
GunterM. (2004) ‘The Kurdish Question in Perspective’, World Affairs, 166 (4), 197–205.
18.
HassoF. S. (1998) ‘The “Women’s Front”: Nationalism, Feminism and Modernity in Palestine’, Gender and Society, 12 (4), 441–465.
19.
HolmstenS. S.MoserR. G.SlosarM. C. (2009) ‘Do Ethnic Parties Exclude Women?’, Comparative Political Studies, 43, 1179–1201.
20.
HughesM. M. (2009) ‘Armed Conflict, International Linkages and Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Developing Nations’, Social Problems, 56 (1), 174–204.
21.
HughesM. M.PaxtonP. (2008) ‘Continuous Change, Episodes and Critical Periods: A Framework for Understanding Women’s Political Representation over Time’, Politics and Gender, 4 (2), 233–264.
JayawardenaK. (1986) Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World. London: Zed Books.
24.
KenworthyL.MalamiM. (1999) ‘Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis’, Social Forces, 78, 235–268.
25.
KittilsonM. C. (1999) ‘Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties’, Party Politics, 5 (1), 79–98.
26.
KittilsonM. (2006) Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe.Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
27.
KolinskyE. (1988) ‘The West German Greens: A Women’s Party?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 41 (1), 129–148.
28.
KrookM. N.LovenduskiM. N.SquiresJ. (2009) ‘Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship’, British Journal of Political Science, 39 (4), 781 – 803.
29.
KrookM. L.NorrisP. (2014) ‘Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office’, Political Studies, 62 (1), 2–20.
30.
Kurdish Human Rights Project (2009) NGO Shadow Report for the Review of the Turkish Government under the UN International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, London, 2009.
31.
KuumbaB. M. (2001) Gender and Social Movements. New York: Alta Mira Press.
32.
LeyenaarM. (2004) Political Empowerment of Women: The Netherlands and Other Countries. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
33.
LovenduskiJ.NorrisP. (1993) Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.
34.
LovenduskiJ.NorrisP. (2003) ‘Westminister Women: The Politics of Presence’, Political Studies, 51 (1), 84–102.
35.
MacaulayF. (2006) Gender Politics in Brazil and Chile: The Role of Parties in National and Local Policymaking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
MassettiE. (2009) ‘Explaining Regionalist Party Positioning in a Multidimensional Ideological Space: A Framework for Analysis’, Regional and Federal Studies, 19 (4–5), 501–531.
37.
MatlandR. E.StudlarD. T. (1996) ‘The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway’, Journal of Politics, 58 (3), 707–733.
38.
MoghadamV. (1994) Identity Politics and Women: Cultural Reassertions and Feminisms in International Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39.
MojabS. (2001) Women of a Non-State Nation: The Kurds. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda.
40.
ÖcalanA. (1992) Kadın ve Aile Sorunu. n.d: Melsa Yayınları.
OzcurumezS.Sayan-CengizF. (2011) ‘On Resilience and Response beyond Value Change: Transformation of Women’s Movement in Post-1980 Turkey’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 34 (1), 20–30.
43.
PaxtonP.KunovichS.HughesM. M. (2007) ‘Gender in Politics’, Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 263–284.
RaiS. M. (2012) ‘The Politics of Access: Narratives of Women MPs in the Indian Parliament’, Political Studies, 60 (1), 195–212.
47.
RussellM.MackayF.McAllisterL. (2002) ‘Women’s Representation in the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales: Party Dynamics in Achieving Critical Mass’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 8, 7–9.
48.
SanbonmatsuK. (2006) Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States, – 1970. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
49.
ShayneJ. D. (2004) The Revolution Question: Feminisms in El Salvador, Chile and Cuba. New York: Rutgers University Press.
50.
SmitsJ.Gündüz-HoşgörA. (2003) ‘Linguistic Capital: Language as a Socio-Economic Resource among Kurdish and Arabic Women in Turkey’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 26, 829–853.
51.
TekeliŞ. (1986) ‘Emergence of the Feminist Movement in Turkey’, in DahlerupD. (ed.), The New Women’s Movement: Feminism and Political Power in Europe and the USA. London: Sage, pp. 179–199.
52.
TrippA.CasimiroI.KwesigaJ.MungwaA. (2009) African Women’s Movements: Transforming Political Landscapes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
UKAM (2014) Akil İnsanlar Heyet Raportları [Wise People Committee Reports]. Organiser, İlhan Kaya, Ankara: International Cultural Research Center, UKAM Publications.
54.
VickersJ. (2006) ‘Bringing Nations In: Some Methodological and Conceptual Issues in Connecting Feminisms with Nationhood and Nationalisms’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8, 84–109.
55.
WeldonL. (2011) Gender and American Politics: When Protest Makes Policy – How Social Movements Represent Disadvantaged Groups. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
56.
WilliartyS. E. (2010) The CDU and the Politics of Gender in Germany: Bringing Women to the Party. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
YegenM. (2006) Müstakbel Türk’ten Sözde Vatandasa Cumhuriyet Ve Kürtler. Istanbul: Iletisim Yayınları.
58.
Yelsalı ParmaksızP. M. (2003) Politics of Women’s Organizations and Civil Society in Turkey. Paper presented at Gender and Power in the New Europe, the 5th European Feminist Research Conference, 20 –24 August, Lund University, Sweden.
59.
Yuval-DavisN. (1997) Gender and Nation. London: Sage.
