Children are expensive to raise. Ensuring that they are raised in such a way that they are able to lead a minimally decent life costs time and money, and lots of both. Who is responsible for bearing the costs of the things that children are undoubtedly owed? This is a question that has received comparatively little scrutiny from political philosophers, despite children being such a drain on public and private finances alike. To the extent that there is a debate, two main views can be identified. The Parents Pay view says that parents, responsible for the existence of the costs, must foot the bill. The Society Pays view says that a next generation is a benefit to all, and so to allow parents to foot the bill alone is the worst kind of free-riding. In this article, I introduce a third potentially liable party currently missing from the debate: children themselves. On my backward-looking view, we are entitled to ask people to contribute to the raising of children on the basis that they have benefited from being raised themselves.
ArnesonR. J. (1982) ‘The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems’, Ethics, 92 (4), 616–33.
2.
BenatarD. (2006) Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BoranI. (2006) ‘Benefits, Intentions, and the Principle of Fairness’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 36 (1), 95–116.
4.
Bou-HabibP. (2013) ‘Parental Subsidies: The Argument from Insurance’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 12 (2), 197–216.
5.
CasalP. (1999) ‘Environmentalism, Procreation, and the Principle of Fairness’, Public Affairs Quarterly, 13 (4), 363–75.
6.
CasalP. and WilliamsA. (1995) ‘Rights, Equality and Procreation’, Analyse and Kritik, 17 (1), 93–116.
7.
CasalP. and WilliamsA. (2004) ‘Equality of Resources and Procreative Justice’, in BurleyJ. (ed.), Dworkin and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 150–69.
8.
CasalP. and WilliamsA. (2008) ‘Equality’, in McKinnonC. (ed.), Issues in Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 149–71.
9.
ClaytonM. (2006) Justice and Legitimacy in Upbringing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
DworkinR. (2000) Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
FolbreN. (1994) ‘Children as Public Goods’, American Economic Review, 84 (2), 86–90.
12.
FolbreN. (2008) Valuing Children. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
FriedmanM. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
GeorgeR. (1987) ‘Who Should Bear the Costs of Children?’, Public Affairs Quarterly, 1 (1), 1–42.
15.
GeorgeR. (1994) ‘On the External Benefits of Children’, in MeyersD. T.KipnisK. and MurphyC. F. (eds), Kindred Matters: Rethinking the Philosophy of the Family. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 209–17.
16.
GoodinR. E. (2005) ‘Responsibilities for Children's Well-Being’, in PriorM. and RichardsonS. (eds), No Time to Lose: The Wellbeing of Australia's Children. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, pp. 60–88.
17.
GosseriesA. P. (2006) ‘Review of Anne Alstott, No Exit‘, Ethics, 116 (4), 769–73.
18.
HarmanE. (2009) ‘Critical Study: David Benatar, Better Never to Have Been‘, Noûs, 43 (4), 776–85.
19.
HartH. L. A. (1955) ‘Are There Any Natural Rights?’, Philosophical Review, 64 (2), 175–91.
20.
KloskoG. (1987) ‘Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 16 (3), 241–59.
21.
McDermottD. (2004) ‘Fair-Play Obligations’, Political Studies, 52 (2), 216–32.
22.
McMahanJ. (1981) ‘Problems of Population Theory’, Ethics, 92 (1), 96–127.
23.
McMahanJ. (1998) ‘Wrongful Life: Paradoxes in the Morality of Causing People to Exist’, in ColemanJ. L. and MorrisC. W. (eds), Rational Commitment and Social Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–48.
24.
NarvesonJ. (1978) ‘Future People and Us’, in SikoraR. I. and BarryB. (eds), Obligations to Future Generations. Philadelphia PA: Temple University Press, pp. 28–60.
25.
NozickR. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
26.
OlsarettiS. (2009) ‘Choice, Circumstance, and the Costs of Children’, in de WijzeS.KramerM. H. and CarterI. (eds), Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice. Abindgon: Routledge, pp. 70–84.
27.
OlsarettiS. (2013) ‘Children as Public Goods?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 41 (3), 226–58.
28.
ParfitD. (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
RawlsJ. (1999) A Theory of Justice, revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
RonzoniM. (2009) ‘The Global Order: A Case of Background Injustice? A Practice-Dependent Account’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 37 (3), 229–56.
32.
ShiffrinS. V. (1999) ‘Wrongful Life, Procreative Responsibility, and the Significance of Harm’, Legal Theory, 5 (2), 117–48.
33.
SteinerH. (1994) An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.
34.
SteinerH. (2009) ‘Responses’, in de WijzeS.KramerM. H. and CarterI. (eds), Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 235–58.
35.
VallentyneP. (2002) ‘Equality and the Duties of Procreators’, in ArchardD. and McLeodC. M. (eds), The Moral and Political Status of Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–211.
36.
VellemanJ. D. (2008a) ‘Persons in Prospect I: The Identity Problem’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36 (3), 221–44.
37.
VellemanJ. D. (2008b) ‘Persons in Prospect II: The Gift of Life’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36 (3), 245–66.
38.
WhiteS. (2003) The Civic Minimum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
