Reviews of devolution in Wales have been focussed so far on empirical description and positive analysis; there has been almost no discussion of how it should be judged or evaluated. I redress this imbalance by considering the arguments for devolution and the various normative values that may be used to evaluate the process. The arguments for devolution are of two basic kinds. Some are consequentialist: that devolution is desired on the grounds that it is believed to have good or desirable effects. Others are deontological: that devolution is thought to be intrinsically valuable. Any attempt to justify and evaluate devolution by consequentialist reasoning amounts to post hoc ergo propter hoc rationalisation. The social sciences are a long way from allowing the prediction of the global long-term net equilibrium effects of a major institutional change such as devolution in Wales. I further argue that the nonconsequentialist value of autonomy is the underlying justification for the devolution process. Devolution should be judged according to how it appeals to, supports or embodies this value.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BonnerJ. (1986) Politics, Economics and Welfare. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
2.
BradburyJ. (1998) ‘The Devolution Debate in Wales during the Major Governments: the Politics of a Developing Union State?’, Regional and Federal Studies, 8 (1), 120–39.
3.
BradburyJ. (2001) ‘Territorial Elites and the Functionalist Method: a Perspective on Devolution in the UK’, Paper to Conference on Multi-level Governance, Sheffield, 28–30 June.
4.
BradburyJ.MitchellJ. (2001) ‘Devolution: New Politics for Old?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 54 (2), 257–75.
5.
BBC (1997) Referendum 97 (Week In Week Out Special). Video recording broadcast 24 July. London: BBC.
CookeP.MorganK. (1998) The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
CurticeJ. (2001) ‘Hopes Dashed and Fears Assuaged? What the public makes of it so far’, in TrenchA. (ed.) State of the Nations 2001. Thoverton: Imprint Academic.
11.
DaviesR. (1999a) Devolution: a Process not an Event. Gregynog Papers. Cardiff: Institute of Welsh Affairs.
12.
DaviesR. (1999b) ‘Preface’ in TaylorB.ThomsonK. (ed.) Scotland and Wales: Nations Again?Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp. xv–xxi.
13.
EastonD. (1975) ‘A Reassessment of the Concept of Political Support’, British Journal of Political Science, 5 (3), 435–57.
14.
ElgieR. (1998) ‘Democratic Accountability and Central Bank Independence: Historical and Contemporary, National and European Perspectives’, West European Politics, 21 (3), 53–76.
15.
ElsterJ. (1979) Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
ElsterJ. (1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
FeatherstoneK. (1994) ‘Jean Monnet and the “democratic deficit” in the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 32 (2), 149–70.
18.
GriffithsD. (1999) ‘The Welsh Office and Welsh Autonomy’, Public Administration, 77 (4), 793–807.
19.
HazellR.CornesR. (1999) ‘Financing Devolution: the Centre Retains Control’ in HazellR. (ed.) Constitutional Futures: a History of the Next Ten Years. The Constitution Unit: Oxford University Press, pp. 230–48.
20.
HazellR. (2000) ‘Introduction: the First Year of Devolution’, in HazellR. (ed.) The State and the Nations. The Constitution Unit: Imprint Academic, pp. 1–12.
21.
HixS. (1997) ‘Executive Selection in the EU: Does Commission President Investiture Reduce the Democratic Deficit?’European Integration Online Papers, 1 (21), (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997–021a.htm).
22.
HixS. (1998) ‘Elections, Parties, and Institutional Design: a Comparative Perspective on EU Democracy’, West European Politics, 21(3), 19–52.
23.
JonesJ. B.BalsomD. (eds) (2000) The Road to the National Assembly for Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
24.
JonesJ. B.OsmondJ. (eds) (2001) Inclusive Government and Party Management. Cardiff: Institute of Welsh Affairs.
25.
KatzR. S. (2001) ‘Models of Democracy: Elite Attitudes and the Democratic Deficit in the EU’, European Union Politics, 2 (1), 53–80.
26.
LaffinM. (2000) ‘Constitutional Design: a Framework for Analysis’, Parliamentary Affairs, 53 (3), 532–41.
27.
LaffinM.ThomasA. (1999) ‘The United Kingdom: Federalism in Denial?’Publius, 29 (4), 89–107.
28.
LaffinM.ThomasA. (2000) ‘New Ways of Working: Political-Official Relations in the National Assembly for Wales’, Paper to Conference After Westminster: Comparative Lessons from Sub-national Governments in Australia, Canada and the UK, University of Glamorgan, 7–8 September.
29.
LaffinM.ThomasA.WebbA. (2000) ‘Intergovernmental Relations after Devolution: the National Assembly for Wales’, The Political Quarterly, 71 (2), 223–233.
30.
LessnoffM. (1974) The Structure of Social Science: a Philosophical Introduction. London: George Allen & Unwin.
31.
LodgeJ. (1994) ‘Transparency and Democratic Legitimacy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 32 (3), 343–68.
32.
MabbettD.BoldersonH. (1999) ‘Devolved Social Security Systems: Principal-Agent versus Multi-level Governance’, Journal of Public Policy, 18 (2), 177–200.
33.
ManinB.PrzeworksiA.StokesS. C. (1999) ‘Introduction’, in PrzeworksiA.StokesS. C.ManinB. (eds) (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–27.
34.
MarinettoM. (2001) ‘The Settlement and Process of Devolution: Territorial Politics and Governance under the Welsh Assembly’, Political Studies, 49 (2), 306–322.
35.
McAllisterL. (2000a) ‘The New Politics in Wales: Rhetoric or Reality?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 53 (3), 591–604.
36.
McAllisterL. (2000b) ‘Devolution and the New Context for Public Policy-making: Lessons from the EU Structural Funds in Wales’, Public Policy and Administration, 15 (2), 38–52.
37.
McAllisterL. (2000c) ‘Changing the Landscape? The Wider Political Lessons from Recent Elections in Wales’, Political Quarterly, 71 (2), 211–22.
38.
McKayD. (2000) ‘Policy Legitimacy and Institutional Design, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38 (1), 25–44.
39.
MorganK. (2001) ‘The New Territorial Politics: Rivalry and Justice in Post-Devolution Britain’, IWA Discussion Paper (www.iwa.org.uk).
MorganP. (1986) The ‘Gwerin’ of Wales: Myth and Reality. Llandysul: Gomer.
42.
MuthooA. (1999) Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
NorthD. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
OsmondJ. (2000a) ‘A Constitutional Convention by Other Means: the First Year of the National Assembly for Wales’, in HazellR. (ed.) The State and the Nations. The Constitution Unit: Imprint Academic, pp. 37–78.
45.
OsmondJ. (2000b) ‘The Vote of No Confidence’, in OsmondJ. (ed.) Devolution Relaunched: Monitoring the National Assembly December 1999 to March 2000. IWA: Cardiff, pp. 2–13.
46.
OsmondJ. (2000c) ‘The Office of the Presiding Officer’, in OsmondJ. (ed.) Coalition Politics Comes to Wales: Monitoring the National Assembly September 2000 to December 2000. IWA: Cardiff, pp. 13–18.
47.
PrzeworksiA.StokesS. C.ManinB. (eds) (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
RawlingsR. (1998) ‘The New Model Wales’, Journal of Law and Society, 25 (4), 461–509.
49.
RawlingsR. (2000) ‘Concordats of the constitution’, Law Quarterly Review, 116, 257–72.
50.
ScharpfF. (1998) Governing in Europe: effective and democratic?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
ScottA. (2000) ‘The Role of Concordats in the New Governance of Britain: Taking Subsidiarity Seriously?’Jean Monnet Papers, No. 8/2000. Harvard Law School.
52.
SenA. K. (1982) Choice, Welfare, Measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.
53.
SenA. K. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland.
54.
SenA. K. (1987) On Ethics & Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
55.
TaylorB.ThomsonK. (eds) (1999) Scotland and Wales: Nations Again?Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
56.
ThomasA. (1999) ‘Politics in Wales: A New Era?’, in DunkerleyD.ThompsonA. (eds) Wales Today. Cardiff: University of Wales, pp. 287–304.
57.
TrenchA. (2001) ‘Introduction: Devolution's Second Year. But Mountains Left to Climb?’, in TrenchA. (ed.) The State of the Nations 2001: the Second Year of Devolution in the UK. Thoverton: Imprint Academic, pp. 1–10.
58.
TsebelisG.GarrettG. (2000) ‘Legislative Politics in the EU’, European Union Politics, 1 (1), 9–36.
59.
VerdunA. (1999) ‘The Institutional Design of EMU: a Democratic Deficit?’Journal of Public Policy, 18 (2), 107–32.
60.
WardD. (2001) ‘The Democratic Deficit and EU Communications Policy: an Evaluation of the Commission's Approach to Broadcasting’, Janvost, VIII (1), 75–94.
61.
WealeA. (1999) Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
62.
WebbA. (1999) ‘Foreword’, in DunkerleyD.ThompsonA. (eds) Wales Today. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp. ix–xi.
63.
Welsh Office (1997) A Voice for Wales: Proposals for a Welsh Assembly. Cm 3718, London: Stationery Office.
64.
WilliamsG. A. (1985) When was Wales? A History of the Welsh. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
65.
Wyn JonesR.TrystanD. (1999) ‘The 1997 Welsh Referendum Vote’, in TaylorB.ThomsonK. (eds) Scotland and Wales: Nations Again?Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp. 65–92.
66.
Wyn JonesR.TrystanD.TaylorB. (2000) ‘Voting Patterns in the Referendum’, in JonesJ. B.BalsomD. (eds) (2000) The Road to the National Assembly for Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp. 161–76.
