AldrichJ. (1995) Why Parties?Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
2.
BarryB. (1978) Sociologists, Economists and Democracy. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
CoaseR. (1937) ‘The nature of the firm’, Economica4, 386–405.
4.
CoxG.McCubbinsM. (1993) Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
5.
della PortaD. (1992) Lo scambio occulto. Bologna: Il Mulino.
6.
ElsterJ. (1983) Explaining Technical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
FieldA. (1982). ‘The problem with neoclassical institutional economics: a critique with special reference to the North/Thomas model of pre-1500 Europe’, Explorations in Economic History, 18, 174–98.
8.
FieldA. (1984) ‘Microeconomics, norms, and rationality’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 34, 683–711.
9.
GeddesB. (1994) Politician's Dilemma. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
10.
HardinR. (1982) Collective Action. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
HopkinJ. (2000) ‘Political parties in an individualistic society: business firm parties in contemporary Italy’. Paper presented at workshop on ‘Political Parties in Individualistic Societies’, Institute of Political Science, Copenhagen, 14 April.
12.
JonesP.HudsonJ. (1998) ‘The role of political parties: an analysis based on transactions costs’, Public Choice, 94, 175–89.
13.
JonesP.HudsonJ. (2001) ‘Political parties, political integrity and public policy: a “transactions costs” approach’, Political Studies, 49, 70–88.
14.
KatzR.KolodnyR. (1994) ‘Party Organisation as an Empty Vessel: Parties in American Politics’, in KatzR.MairP. (eds), How Parties Organise: Change and Adaptation in Party Organisations in Western Democracies. London: Sage, pp. 23–50.
15.
KiewetR.McCubbinsM. (1991) The Logic of Delegation. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
16.
MuellerW.StromK. (1999) Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
OlsonM. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
SchlesingerJ. (1991) Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
19.
TsebelisG. (1990) Nested Games. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
20.
WittmanD. (1989) ‘Why democracies produce efficient results’, Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1395–424.
21.
WittmanD. (1995). The Myth of Democratic Failure.Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.