The implementation of the Belfast or Good Friday Agreement has been marked by recurring crises. While each of these has its specific causes, they are symptomatic of contradictions in the underlying conditions of conflict. These made the Belfast Agreement possible, but they also create difficulties in its implementation. The Agreement echoes – not least in its ambiguities – the underlying contradictions, reconstituting the political terrain in terms of them. This has reproduced the tendency toward conflict even among the supporters of the Agreement, whose different responses and ends-in-view reflect the objective uncertainties in the situation. Political crises are likely to continue even after the full implementation of the Agreement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartlettT. (1992) The Fall and Rise of the Irish Nation: The Catholic Question 1690–1830. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
2.
Belfast Agreement (1998) Agreement Reached in the Multi-Party Negotiations. Dublin.
3.
BellD. (1990) Acts of Union: Youth Culture and Sectarianism in Northern Ireland. London: Macmillan.
4.
BewPaul (1998) ‘The unionists have won, they just don't know it’, Sunday Times, 17 May.
5.
BoalF. W.KeaneM. C.LivingstoneD. N. (1997) Them and Us? Attitudinal Variation among Churchgoers in Belfast. Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies.
6.
BoyceD. G. (1992) Ireland 1828–1923: From Ascendancy to Democracy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
7.
British-Irish Agreement (1998) Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of Ireland. Dublin and London.
8.
ComptonP.CowardJ.DavisK. Wilson (1985) ‘Family size and religious denomination in Northern Ireland’, Journal of Biosocial Science, 17, pp. 137–45.
9.
CormackP. J.GallagherA. M.OsborneR. D. (1993) Fair Enough? Religion and the 1991 Population Census. Belfast: Fair Employment Commission.
10.
CoulterC. (1997) ‘The culture of contentment: The political beliefs and practice of the unionist middle class’, in ShirlowP.McGovernM. (eds), Who are ‘The People’? Unionism, Protestantism and Loyalism in Northern Ireland. London: Pluto, pp. 114–39.
11.
CourbageY. (1997) ‘Démographie et politique en Irlande du Nord’, in RalluJ.-L.CourbageY.PichéV. (eds), Old and New Minorities. London: John Libbey, pp. 335–61.
12.
Downing Street Declaration (1993) The Joint Declaration for Peace: Statement made at Downing Street 15 December.
13.
DoyleJohn (1999) ‘Governance and citizenship in contested states: The Northern Ireland peace agreement as internationalised governance’, Irish Studies in International Affairs, 10, 201–19.
14.
EvansG.O'LearyB. (2000) ‘Northern Irish voters and the British-Irish Agreement: Foundations of a stable consociational settlement?’, The Political Quarterly, 71, 78–101.
15.
Framework (1995) The Joint British-Irish Framework Document, Frameworks for the Future, 22 February.
16.
HadfieldB. (1998) ‘The Belfast Agreement, sovereignty and the state of the union’, Public Law, Winter, 599–616.
17.
HayesB.McAllisterI. (1999) ‘Ethnonationalism, public opinion and the Good Friday Agreement’, in RuaneJ.ToddJ. (eds), After the Good Friday Agreement: Analysing Political Change in Northern Ireland. Dublin: UCD Press, pp. 30–48.
18.
HepburnA. C., (1996) A Past Apart: Studies in the History of Catholic Belfast 1850–1950. Belfast: Ulster Historical Foundation.
19.
HennessyT. (2000) The Northern Ireland Peace Process: Ending the Troubles?Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
20.
HumeJ. (1996) John Hume: Personal Views. Dublin: Town House.
21.
McCarleyA. (1994) ‘The popular, sectarian-class football culture of N. Irish society: A sociological analysis’, D. Phil thesis, University of Ulster, Department of Sociology.
22.
McCruddenC. (1999) ‘Mainstreaming equality in the governance of Northern Ireland’, Fordham International Law Journal, 22, 4, 1696–1775.
23.
McLaughlinM. (1998) ‘The republican ideal’, in PorterN. (ed.), The Republican Ideal: Current Perspectives. Belfast: Blackstaff pp. 62–84.
24.
ManserghM. (1998) ‘The challenges of the Good Friday Agreement and the consolidation of peace’, Address to the Irish Association, Glenview Hotel, Glen of the Downs, Co. Wicklow, 22 November (reprinted in Céide, 5, 5–8).
25.
O'LearyB. (1999) ‘The nature of the British-Irish Agreement’, New Left Review233, 66–96.
26.
O'LearyB. (2000) ‘Albion retains the right to be perfidious’, Sunday Business Post, 30 April.
27.
O'LearyB.McGarryJ. (1993) The Politics of Antagonism. London: Athlone.
28.
PollakA. (ed.) (1993) A Citizen's Inquiry: The Opsahl Report on Northern Ireland. Dublin: Lilliput.
29.
RolstonW. (1999) ‘Music and politics in Ireland: The case of loyalism’, in HarringtonJ. P.MitchellE. J. (eds), Politics and Performance in Contemporary Northern Ireland. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 29–56.
30.
RuaneJ. (1999) ‘The end of (Irish) history. Three readings of the current conjuncture’, in RuaneJ.ToddJ. (eds), After the Good Friday Agreement: Analysing Political Change in Northern Ireland. Dublin: UCD Press, pp. 145–70.
31.
RuaneJ.ToddJ. (1996) The Dynamics of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Power, Conflict and Emancipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
RuaneJ.ToddJ. (2000) ‘The Good Friday Agreement: A new constitutional beginning in Northern Ireland?’, Civitas Europas, 4, 121–42.
33.
RuaneJ.ToddJ. (2001) ‘Northern Ireland and the impact of globalization’, in CrottyW.SchmittD. (eds), Ireland on the World Stage. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.
34.
SmithA. D. (1995) Nations and Nationalism in a Global Age. Cambridge: Polity.
35.
ToddJ. (1999) ‘Nationalism, republicanism and the Good Friday Agreement’, in RuaneJ.ToddJ. (eds), After the Good Friday Agreement: Analysing Political Change in Northern Ireland. Dublin: UCD Press, pp. 49–70.
36.
TrimbleD. (2000) ‘It may be rocky, but Ulster has no other road to peace’, Sunday Times, 21 May.
