BaynesK.EliassenJ.C. (1998). The visual lexicon: Its access and organization in commissurotomy patients. InBeemanM.ChiarelloC. (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 79–104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
BaynesK.TramoM.J.GazzanigaM.S. (1992). Reading with a limited lexicon in the right hemisphere of a callosotomy patient. Neuropsychologia, 30, 187–200.
3.
BogenJ.E.VogelP.J. (1975). Neurological status in the long term following cerebral commissurotomy. InMichelF.SchottB. (Eds.), Les syndromes de disconnexion calleause chez l'homme (pp. 227–251). Lyon, France: Hospital Neurologique.
4.
CorballisM.C.SergentJ. (1989). Mental rotation in a commissurotomized subject. Neuropsychologia, 27, 585–597.
5.
EglyR.RafalR.DriverJ.StarrveveldY. (1994). Covert orienting in the split brain reveals hemispheric specialization for object-based attention. Psychological Science, 5, 380–383.
6.
EviatarZ.ZaidelE. (1994). Letter matching within and between the disconnected hemispheres. Brain and Cognition, 25, 128–137.
7.
FendrichR.WessingerC.M.GazzanigaM.S. (1996). Nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical meridian: Investigations with a callosotomy patient. Neuropsychologia, 24, 637–646.
8.
FranzE.A.EliassenJ.C.IvryR.B.GazzanigaM.S, (1996). Dissociation of spatial and temporal coupling in the bimanual movements of callosotomy patients. Psychological Science, 7, 306–310.
9.
GazzanigaM.S. (1995). Principles of human brain organization derived from split-brain studies. Neuron, 14, 217–218.
10.
GazzanigaM.S.BogenJ.E.SperryR.W. (1962). Some functional effects of sectioning the cerebral commissures in man. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 48, 1765–1769.
11.
IvryR.B.FranzE.A.KingstoneA.JohnstonJ.C. (1998). The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: Uncoupling of lateralized response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 463–480.
12.
KosslynS.M.KoenigO. (1992). Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience, New York; Free Press.
13.
LevyJ. (1977). Manifestations and implications of shifting hemi-inattention in commissurotomy patients. InWeinsteinE.A.FriedlandR.P. (Eds.), Advances in neurology (Vol. 18, pp. 33–39). New York: Raven Press.
14.
MangunG.R.HillyardS.A.LuckS.J.HandyT.PlagerR.ClarkV.P.LoftusW.GazzanigaM.S. (1994). Monitoring the visual world: Hemispheric asymmetries and subcortical processes in attention, Journal of Cognitive neuroscience, 6, 267–275.
15.
MetcalfeJ.FunnellM.GazzanigaM.S. (1995). Right-hemisphere memory superiority: Studies of a split-brain patient. Psychological Science., 6, 157–164.
16.
MillerM.B.KingstoneA.GazzanigaM.S. (1997), HERA and the split-brain. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 22, 1579.
17.
MoscovitchM.WinocurG.BehrmannM. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 555–604.
18.
PetersenS.E.FoxP.T.SnyderA.Z.RaichleM.E. (1990). Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. Science, 249, 1041–1044.
19.
PhelpsE.A.GazzanigaM.S. (1992). Hemispheric differences in mnemonic processing: The effects of left hemisphere interpretation. Neuropsychologia, 30, 293–297.
20.
PolkT.A.FarahM.J. (1998). The neural development and organization of letter recognition: Evidence from functional neuroimaging, computational modeling, and behavioral studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 847–852.
21.
Reuter-LorenzP.A. (in press). Attention and the bisected brain: Implications for an analysis of callosal function. InZaidelE.IacoboniM. (Eds.), The role of the corpus callosum in sensory-motor integration: Anatomy, physiology and behavior, New York: Plenum Press.
22.
Reuter-LorenzP.A.BaynesK. (1992). Modes of lexical access in the callosotomized brain, Journal of Cognitive neuroscience, 4, 155–164.
23.
Reuter-LorenzP.A.NozawaG.GazzanigaM.S.HughesH.C. (1995). The fate of neglected targets in the callosotomized brain: A chronometric analysis, Journal of experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 211–230.
24.
RobertsonL.C.LambM.R.ZaidelE. (1993). Interhemispheric relations in processing hierarchical patterns: Evidence from normal and commissurotomized subjects. Neuropsychology, 7, 325–342.
25.
SergentJ. (1990). Furtive incursions into bicameral minds. Integrative and coordinating role of subcortical structures. Brain, 113, 537–568.
SingerJ.CheddG.AngierJ. (1997). Pieces of mind: Inside the human body [Videotape]. (Available from Connecticut Public Television, Hartford, CT).
28.
SmithE.E.JonidesJ. (1997). Working memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 5–42.
29.
StoneV.E.NisensonL.EliassenJ.C.GazzanigaM.S. (1996). Left hemisphere representations of emotional facial expressions. Neuropsychologia, 34, 23–29.
30.
Van KleeckM. (1989). Hemisphere differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1165–1178.
31.
WeekesN.Y.CarusiD.ZaidelE. (1997). Interhemispheric relations in hierarchical perception: A second look. Neuropsychologia, 35, 37–44.