AbelsonR.P. (1995) Statistics as principled argument. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
BakanD. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423–437.
3.
BergerJO.BerryD. A. (1988). Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. American Scientist, 76, 159–165.
4.
CarverR.P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378–399.
5.
CarverR.P. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing, revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287–292.
6.
CohenJ. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.
7.
CohenJ. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.
8.
FisherR.A. (1935). The design of experiments. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver and Boyd.
9.
GigerenzerG.SwijtinkZ.PorterT.DastonL.BeattyJ.KrugerL. (1989). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
10.
GrantD.A. (1962). Testing the null hypothesis and the strategy and tactics of investigating theoretical models. Psychological Review, 69, 54–61.
11.
GreenwaldA.G.GonzalezR.HarrisR.J.GuthrieD. (1996). Effect sizes and p-values: What should be reported and what should be replicated?Psychophysiology, 3, 3, 175–183.
12.
HaysW,(1973). Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt.
13.
JonesL.V. (1955). Statistics and research design. Annua! Review of Psychology, 6, 405–430.
14.
LoftusG.R. (1985). Evaluating forgetting curves. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 396–405.
15.
LoftusG.R (1991). On the tyranny of hypothesis testing in the social sciences. Contemporary Psychology, 36, 102–105.
LoftusG.R. (1993b). Visual data representation and hypothesis testing in the microcomputer age. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 250–256.
18.
LoftusG.R. (1995). Data analysis as insight. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 57–59.
19.
LoftusG.R.BamberD. (1990). Weak models, strong models, unidimensional models, and psychological time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16916–926.
20.
LoftusG.R.MassonM.E.J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 476–490.
MaltzM.D. (1994). Deviating from the mean: The declining significance of significance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31. 434–463.
23.
MeehlP.E. (1967). Theory testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103–115.
24.
MeehlP.E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald and the slow process of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.
25.
MeehlP.E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninter-pretablc. Psychological Reports, 66(Suppl 1)195–244.
26.
NunnallyJ. (1960). The place of statistics in psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 641–650.
RosnowR.L.RosenthalR. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284.
29.
RozeboomW.W. (1960). The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416–428.
30.
SchmidtF. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115–129.
31.
SlameckaN.J.McElreeB. (1983). Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of their degree of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 384–397.
32.
TylerR.W. (1935). What is statistical significance?Educational Research Bulletin, 10, 115–118, 142.