BallouD.PodgurskyM.J. (1997). Teacher pay and teacher quality. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
2.
BanathyB.H. (1992). A systems view of education: Concepts and principles for effective practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
3.
BerlinerD.C.BiddleB.J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud and the attack on American public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
BraceyG.W. (1991, October). Why can't they be like we were? Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 104–117.
5.
BraceyG.W. (1997, October). The seventh Bracey report on the condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 120–137.
6.
BransonR.K. (1987). Why the schools can't improve: The upper limit hypothesis. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(1), 7–12.
7.
BransonR.K. (1997). Redesigning public education: The Florida Schoolyear 2000 Initiative. Educational Technology, 37(6), 14–24.
8.
BunkerB.B.AlbanB.T. (Eds.). (1992). Large group interventions [Special issue]. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28(4).
9.
BunkerB.B.AlbanB.T. (1997). Large group interventions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
CubanL. (1992, November 11). Computers meet classroom; classroom wins. Education Week, pp. 36–37.
14.
Darling-HammondL. (1990). Instructional policy into practice: “The power of the bottom over the top.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 339–347.
15.
DemingW.E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
GauseD.C.WeinbergG.M. (1989). Exploring requirements: Quality before design. New York: Dorset House.
17.
GearyD.C. (1996). International differences in mathematical achievement: Their nature, causes, and consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 133–137.
18.
GerstnerL.V.SemeradR.D.DoyleP.D.JohnstonW.B. (1994). Reinventing education: Entrepreneurship in America's schools. New York: Dutton.
19.
GeryG.J. (1991). Electronic performance support systems. Boston: Weingarten Publications.
20.
HanushekE.A. (1997, Winter). Why true reform of schools is so unlikely. Jobs & Capital, VI, 22–27.
21.
LiebermanA. (1992). The meaning of scholarly activity and the building of community. Educational Researcher, 21(6), 5–12.
22.
MathewsJ. (1998). Class struggle: What's wrong (and right) with America's best public high schools. New York: Times Books.
23.
MilesK.H.Darling-HammondL. (1998). Rethinking the allocation of teaching resources: Some lessons from high-performing schools. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 9–29.
24.
PapertS. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
25.
PeaR.D. (1997). Learning and teaching with educational technologies. InWalbergH.J.HaertelG.D. (Eds.), Educational psychology: Effective practices and policies (pp. 274–296). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
26.
PerelmanL.J. (1989). Closing education's technology gap. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute, Herman Kahn Center.
27.
SalisburyD.S. (1996). Five technologies for educational change. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
SmithC.S. (1981). A search for structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
WrightS.P.HornS.P.SandersW.L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67.