BockR.D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 37, 29–51.
2.
DrasgowF.ParsonsC.K. (1983). Application of unidimensional item response theory models to multidimensional data. Applied Psychological Measurement. 7. 189–199.
3.
HambletonR.K.JonesR.W. (1993). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 12, 38–47.
4.
KeldermanH. (1997). Loglinear multidimensional item response model for polytomously scored items. Invan der LindenW.J.HambletonR.K. (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp.287–304). New York: Springer-Verlag.
5.
KirisciL.TarterR.E.HsuT. (1994). Fitting a two-parameter logistic item response model to clarify the psychometric properties of the drug use screening inventory for adolescent alcohol and drug abusers. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 18, 1335–1341.
6.
LevineM.V.RubinD.B. (1979). Measuring the appropriateness of multiple-choice test scores. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 269–290.
7.
LevineM.V.TsienS. (1997). A geometric approach to two dimensional measurement. InMarleyA.J. (Ed.), Choice, decision and measurement (pp.207–223). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
ReckaseM.D. (1997). The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 25–36.
9.
RoskamE.E. (1985). Current issues in item response theory. InRoskamE.E. (Ed.), Measurement and personality assessment (pp.3–19). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
10.
RoskamE.E. (1997). Models for speed and time-limit tests. Invan der LindenW.J.HambletonR.K. (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp.187–208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
RoznowskiM. (1989). An examination of the measurement properties of the Job Descriptive Index with experimental items, journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 805–814.
12.
SamejimaF. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 34 (Suppl. 17).
13.
ThissenD.SteinbergL. (1988). Data analysis using item response theory. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 385–395.
14.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 221, 453–458.
15.
ZickarM.J.DrasgowF. (1996). Detecting faking on a personality instrument using appropriateness measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 71–87.
16.
ZickarM.J.HighhouseS. (1998). Looking closer at the effects of framing on risky choice: An item response theory analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes75, 75–91.
