AmmonsR.R. (1956). Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. Journal of General Psychology, 54. 279–299.
2.
AnnettI, (1969). Feedback and human behaviour Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
3.
BalzerW.K.DohertyM.E.O'ConnorK.Jr. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performancePsychological Bulletin106410–433.
4.
BullerR. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance, Journal of Educational Psychology79, 471–482.
5.
CarverC.S.ScheierM.F. (1981). Attention and self regulation: A control theory of human behaviorNew York: Springer-Verlag.
6.
GuthrieV.A.Kelly-RadfordI., (in press), Developing leaders with; a feedback intensive program-InMcCauleyC.D.MoxleyK.Van VelsorE. (Eds.), The centre for Creative leadership handbook of leadership developmentSan Franciseo: Josscy-Bass.
7.
HigginsE.T. (1947), Beyond pleasure pain. American Psychologist, 52. 1280–1300.
8.
HowellJ.M.AvolioB.J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, to cus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-busincss-unit per, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891–902.
9.
IIgenD.R.FisherC.D.TaylorMS. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizationsJournal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349–361.
10.
KairiE., (1996). The moderating effect of social facilation on the relationship of response time and in Unpublished master's thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
11.
KanferR.AckermanP.I, (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integration/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition, Journal of Applied Psychology74657–690.
12.
KlugerA.N. (in press),Feedback-expectation discrepancy, arousal and locus of congnition. InErezM.KleinbeckU.ThierryH. (Eds), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
KlugerA.N.DeNisiA. (1996). The effects of feedback interv entions on performance: Historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Pschological Bulletin. 119254–284.
14.
KlugerA.N.LewinsohnS.AielloJ. (1991). The influence of feedback on mood: Linear effects on pleasantness and curvilinear effects on arousal, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60276–299.
15.
MarshH.W.RocheL.A. (1997), Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effcctive: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility- American Psychologist, 521, 187–197.
16.
PodsakoffP.M.FarhJ.H. (1989). Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 44, 45–67.
17.
PresseyS.L. (1950), Development and appraisal of devices providing immediate automatic scoring of objective tests and concomitant self-instructionJournal of Psychology, 29. 417–447.
18.
PritcbardR.D.JonesS.D.RothP.I.StuebingK.K.EkebergS.E. (1988). Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity [Monograph], Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 337–358.
19.
ReillyR.R.SmitherJ.W.VasilopoulosN.L. (1996). A longitudinal study of upward feedback. Personnel Psycholgy49. 599–612.
20.
SalmoniA.W.SchmidtK.A.WalterC.B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.
21.
SlomanS.A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin. 119, 3–22.
22.
TaylorS.E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis, Psychologcial Bulletin, 11067–85.
23.
ThorndikeE.L, (1913), Educational psychology: Vol. The original nature of manNewYork: Teachers College Columbia University.
24.
ThorndikeE.K.. (1927). The law of effect. American journal of Psychology, 39, 212–222.