AttneaveF. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception, Psychological Review, 61, 183–193.
2.
BiedermanI. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.
3.
BinfordT.O. (Decmber 1971). Visual perception by computer. Paper presented at IEEE Systems Science and Cybernetics Conference, Miami, FL.
4.
CederbergJ.N. (1989). A course in modern geometries. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5.
GarnerW.R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
6.
GibsonJ.J. (1957). Optical motions and transformations as stimuli for visual perception. Psychological Review, 64, 288–295.
7.
HargittaiI.HargittaiM. (1994). Symmetry: A unifying concept. Bolinas, CA: Shelter Publications.
8.
HintonG. (1979), Some demonstrations of the effects of structural descriptions in mental imagery. Cognitive Science, 3: 231–250.
9.
HoldenA. (1971). Shapes, space, and symmetry. New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
LeeuwenbergE.L.J. (1971). A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. American Journal of Psychology, 84: 307–349.
11.
MarrD. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
12.
PalmerS.E. (1980). What makes triangles point: Local and global effects in configuration of ambiguous triangles. Cognitive. Psychology, 12, 285–305.
13.
PaniJ.R. (1993). Limits on the comprehension of rotational motion: Mental imagery of rotations with oblique components. Perception, 22, 785–808.
14.
PaniJ.R. (1994). The generalized cone in human spatial organization. InTylerC.W. (Ed.), Theoretical issues in symmetry perception [Special issue]. Spatial Vision, 8, 491–502.
15.
PaniJ.R. (in press). Descriptions of orientation and structure in perception and physical reasoning, InWinogradEFivushR.HirstW (Eds), Ecological approaches to cognition; Essays in honor of Ulric Neisser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
PaniJ.R.DupreeD. (1994). Spatial reference systems in the comprehension of rotational motion. Perception, 23, 929–946.
PaniJ.R.WilliamC.T.ShippeyG. (1995). Determinants of the perception of rotational motion: Orientation of the motion to the object and to the environment, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1441–1456.
19.
PaniJ.R.WilliamC.T.ShippeyG.T. (1998). Orientation in physical reasoning: Determining the edge that would be formed by two surfaces, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 283–300.
20.
PaniJ.R.ZhouH.FriendS.M. (1997). Perceiving and imagining Plato's solids: The generalized cylinder in spatial organization of 3D structures. Visual Cognition, 4, 225–264.
21.
ParsonsL.M. (1995). Inability to reason about an object's orientation using an axis and angle of rotation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1259–1277.
22.
RockI. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
23.
SedgwickH.A. (1986). Space perception. InBoffK.R.KaufmanL.ThomasJ.P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception (pp.21–1–21–57). New York: Wiley.
24.
ShepardR.N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417–447.
25.
ShepardR.N.CooperL.A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.