Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In public surveys, the most common complaint about television is the amount of violence depicted on the screen. More than half the programs shown on television are violent, and hundreds of studies have shown that viewing TV violence causes an increase in societal violence. Nevertheless, advertisers continue to sponsor violent programs. For an advertisement to be effective, people should be able to remember the brand advertised and the message in the advertisement. This article reviews the effect of TV violence on memory for ads. A meta-analysis integrating the results from 12 studies involving more than 1,700 participants shows that TV violence impairs memory for ads. The impairment occurs for males and females, for children and adults, and for people who like and do not like to watch TV violence. These results suggest that sponsoring violent programs might not be a profitable venture for advertisers.

Keywords

televised violence memory commercials meta-analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berkowitz

(1984). Some effects of thoughts on anti-social and prosocial influences of media effects: A cognitive-neoassociation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 410–427.

Bushman

B.J.

(1995). Moderating role of trait aggressiveness in the effects of violent media on aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 950–960.

Bushman

B.J.

(1998). Effects of television violence on memory of commercial messages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 291–307.

Bushman

B.J.

Anderson

C.A.

(2000). Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Bushman

B.J.

Huesmann

L.R.

(2001). Effects of televised violence on aggression. In Singer

D.G.

Singer

J.L.

(Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 223–254). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Ellis

H.C.

Thomas

R.L.

Rodriguez

L.A.

(1984). Emotional mood states and memory: Elaborative encoding, semantic processing, and cognitive effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 470–482.

Hamilton

J.T.

(1998). Channeling violence: The economic market for violent television programming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Huston

A.C.

Donnerstein

Fairchild

Feshbach

N.D.

Katz

P.A.

Murray

J.P.

Rubinstein

E.A.

Wilcox

B.L.

Zuckerman

(1992). Big world, small screen: The role of television in American society. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

The industry: Fighting violence. (1968, December 27). Time, 92, 58–59.

10.

Kim

S.J.

(1994). “Viewer discretion is advised”: A structural approach to the issue of television violence. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 142, 1383–1441.

11.

Lousy frames for beautiful pictures: Are they changing? (1977, May 23). Advertising Age, 48, 56.

12.

Medved

(1995, October). Hollywood's 3 big lies. Reader's Digest, 147, 155–158.

13.

Morris

W.N.

Reilly

N.P.

(1987). Toward the self-regulation of mood: Theory and research. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 215–249.

14.

National Television Violence Study. (1998). National television violence study (Vol. 3). Santa Barbara, CA: The Center for Communication and Social Policy, University of California, Santa Barbara.

15.

TV Guide. (1992, October 10–16). TV Guide poll: Would you give up TV for a million bucks? TV Guide, 40, 10–13, 15, 17.

If the Television Program Bleeds,Memory for the Advertisement Recedes

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References