BeneriaL.BlankR. (1989) ‘Women and the Economics of Military Spending’, in HarrisA.KingY. (eds), Rocking the Ship of State (Boulder, CO: Westview).
2.
BierstekerT. (2002) ‘State, Sovereignty and Territory’, in CarlsnaesW.RisseT. (eds), Handbook of International Relations Theory (London: Sage).
3.
BierstekerT.WeberC. (1996) State Sovereignty and Social Construct (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
4.
CarverT.CochranM.SquiresJ. (1998) ‘Gendering Jones’, Review of International Studies, 24:2, 283–298.
5.
ChatterjeeP. (1991) ‘Whose Imagined Communities?’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 20:3.
6.
ChowdhryG.NairS. (eds) (2002) Postcolonialism and International Relations: Race, Gender and Class (London: Routledge).
7.
ConnellR. W. (1995) Masculinities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
8.
CookeM.WoollacottA. (1993) Gendering War Talk (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
9.
CoxR. (1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory’, in KeohaneR. (ed), Neorealism and its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press).
10.
CromptonR. (1997) Women and Work in Modern Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
11.
D'AmicoF.BeckmanP. (1994) Women in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).
12.
DominelliL. (1991) Women Across Continents: Feminist Comparative Social Policy (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
13.
EnloeC. (1989) Bananas, Beaches and Bases; Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
14.
EnloeC. (1993) The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
15.
EnloeC. (2000) Manoeuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
16.
EnloeC. (2001) ‘Interview with Professor Cynthia Enloe’, Annual Convention of the ISA in Chicago, February 2001, Review of International Studies, 27:4, 649–666.
17.
ElshtainBethkeJ. (1987) Women and War (New York: Basic Books).
18.
EpsteinC. (1991) ‘In Praise of Women Warriors’, Dissent, 38:2, 421–422.
19.
FearonJ.WendtA. (2002) ‘Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View’, in CarlsnaesW.RisseT.SimmondsB., (eds), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage).
20.
FraserN. (1987) ‘What's Critical about Critical Theory?’, in CornellD.FraserN. (eds), Feminism as Critique (Oxford: Polity).
21.
FukuyamaF. (1998) ‘Women and the Evolution of World Politics’, Foreign Affairs, 77:5, 24–40.
22.
GrantR.NewlandK. (1990) Gender and International Relations (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
23.
HallidayF. (1988) ‘Hidden from International Relations: Women and the International Arena’, in Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17:3, 419–428.
24.
HardingS. (1987) ‘Is There a Feminist Method’, in HardingS. (ed), Feminism and Methodology (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
25.
HardingS. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
26.
HirschmannN. (1992) Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory (New York: Cornell University Press).
27.
HoffmanJ. (2001) Gender and Sovereignty (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
28.
HooperC. (2001) Masculinities, International Relations and Gender Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).
29.
HutchingsK. (2000) ‘Towards a Feminist International Ethics’, Review of International Studies, 26: special issue, 111–130.
30.
JonesA. (1996) ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Around? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 22:4, 405–429.
31.
JonesA. (1998) ‘Engendering Debate’, Review of International Studies, 24:2, 299–303.
32.
JonesWynR. (2001) Critical Theory and World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
33.
KandiyotiD. (1991) ‘Identity and its Discontents: Women and the Nation’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29:3, 429–443.
34.
KeohaneR. (1989) ‘International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 18:2, 245–253.
35.
KeohaneR. (1998) ‘Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory’, International Studies Quarterly, 42:1, 193–198.
36.
KrauseJ. (1993) ‘Gender and International Relations: A Survey of Teaching and Research in the UK’, working paper (Nottingham: Nottingham Trent University).
37.
LapidY. (1989) ‘The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era’, International Studies Quarterly, 33:3, 235–254.
38.
LingL.BellN. (1998) ‘Theorizing Hegemony: A Critical Examination of Gender, Race and Class in Gramscian Globalism’, conference paper, September 1998 (Vienna: IR Standing Group of the ECPR).
39.
LinklaterA. (1998) The Transformation of Political Community (Oxford: Polity).
40.
MarchandM. (1998) ‘Different Communities/Different Realities/Different Encounters: A Reply to J. Ann Tickner’, International Studies Quarterly, 42:1, 199–204.
41.
MarchandM.RunyanA. S. (2000) Gender and Global Restructuring: Sitings, Sites and Resistances (London: Routledge).
42.
McGlenN.SarkeesReidM. (1993) Women in Foreign Policy (London: Routledge).
43.
McLeanJ. (1981) ‘Political Theory, International Theory and Problems of Ideology, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10:2, 102–125.
44.
MernissiF. (1987) The Veil and the Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation of Women's Rights in Islam (New York: Addison Wesley).
45.
MorgenthauH. (1948) Politics Among Nations (New York: Alfred Knopf).
46.
MurphyC. (1996) ‘Seeing Women, Recognizing Gender, Recasting International Relations’, International Organisation, 3:5, 513–538.
47.
MyersonM.NorthcottS. (1994) ‘The Question of Gender: An Examination of Selected Textbooks in International Relations’, International Studies Notes, 19:1, 62–64.
48.
NeufeldM. (1995) The Restructuring of IR Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
49.
PetersonSpikeV. (1992a) ‘Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21:2, 183–206.
50.
PetersonSpikeV. (ed) (1992b) Gendered States; Feminist (Re)Visions of International Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
51.
PetersonV. Spike.ParisiL. (1998) ‘Are Women Human? This is not an Academic Question’, in EvanT. (ed), Human Rights Fifty Years On: A Reappraisal (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
52.
PetersonSpikeV.RunyanA. (1993) Global Gender Issues (Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner).
53.
PettmanJ. (1996) Worlding Women (London: Routledge).
54.
RobertsY. (2003) ‘How Women's Roles are Camouflaged’, The Observer, 23 March 2003.
55.
RobinsonF. (1999) Globalising Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory and International Relations (Oxford: Westview).
56.
SchmidtB. (2002) ‘On the History and Histography of International Relations’, in CarlsnaesW.RisseT.SimmondsB., Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage).
57.
SkjelsbaekI.SmithD. (2001) Gender, Peace and Conflict (London: Sage).
58.
SmithS. (2001) ‘Reflectivist and Constructivist Approaches’, in BaylisJ.SmithS. (eds), The Globalization of World Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
59.
Special Issue (1988) ‘Women in International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17:3.
60.
SteansJ. (1997) Gender and IR (Oxford: Polity Press).
61.
SteansJ. (2003) ‘Conflicting Loyalties: Women's Human Rights and the Politics of Identity’, in WallerM.LinklaterA. (eds), Loyalty and the Post-National State (London: Routledge).
62.
SylvesterC. (1994a) Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
SylvesterC. (1994b) ‘Empathetic Co-operation: A Feminist Method for IR’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23:3, 315–334.
64.
TicknerJ. A. (1992) Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security (New York: Columbia University Press).
65.
TicknerJ. A. (1997) ‘You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, 41:4, 611–632.
66.
TicknerJ.A (1998) ‘Continuing the Conversation’, International Studies Quarterly, 42:1, 205–210.
67.
TicknerJ. A. (1999) ‘Why Women Can't Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama, International Studies Review, 1:3, 3–12.
68.
TicknerA. (2001) Gendering World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).
69.
ToozeR.MurphyC. (1991) ‘Getting Beyond the “Common Sense” in the IPE Orthodoxy’, in ToozeR.MurphyC. (eds), The New International Political Economy (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
70.
VasquezJ. (1983) The Power of Power Politics (London: Pinter).
71.
WalkerR. B. J. (1992) ‘Gender and Critique in the Theory of International Relations’, in Spike PetersonV. (ed), Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).
72.
WaltzK. (1979) Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
73.
WeberC. (1994) ‘Good Girls, Bad Girls and Little Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane's Critique of Feminist International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23:2, 337–349.
74.
WeberC. (2001) International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction (London: Routledge).
75.
WendtA. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
76.
WhitworthS. (1989) ‘Gender in the Interparadigm Debate’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 18:2.
77.
WhitworthS. (1994a) ‘Theory as Exclusion; Gender and International Political Economy’, in StubbsR.UnderhillG., Political Economy and the Changing Global Order (London: Macmillan).
78.
WhitworthS. (1994b) Feminism and International Relations: Towards a Political Economy of Gender in Interstate and Non-Governmental Institutions (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
79.
WilliamsA. (1993) ‘On the Outside Looking In or Without a Look In: A Feminist Perspective on the Individual in IR’, The Oxford Review of International Studies, May 1993, 142–155.
80.
YoungsG. (1999) International Relations in a Global Age: A Conceptual Challenge (Oxford: Polity).
81.
ZalewskiM. (1993) ‘Feminist Standpoint Meets International Relations Theory: A Feminist Version of David and Goliath’, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 17:2, 221–229.
82.
ZalewskiM. (1994) ‘The “Woman/Women” Question in International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23:3, 407–423.
83.
ZalewskiM. (1995) ‘Well, What is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia?’, International Affairs, 71:2, 339–356.
84.
ZalewskiM. (1996) ‘All These Theories yet the Bodies Keep Piling Up’, in SmithS.BoothK.ZalewskiM. (eds), International Theory: Positivism and After (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
85.
ZalewskiM. (1999) ‘Where is Woman in International Relations? To Return as a Woman and Be Heard’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 27:4, 847–867.
86.
ZalewskiM. (2002) ‘Feminism and International Relations: An Exhausted Conversation?’, in HarveyF.BrecherM. (eds), Critical Paradigms in International Studies (Michigan: University of Michigan Press).
87.
ZalewskiM.ParpartJ. (eds) (1998) The ‘Man’ Question in International Relations (Oxford: Westview).