This article is an attempt to survey and analyse current developments in American political science with particular reference to the current wave of institutionalist theory. The main thrust of this article is to argue that the current concerns of the field are hardly new issues, but rather perennial. We argue that the current ‘state of the discipline’ is in many ways more a function of recurrent intellectual dilemmas of a general social scientific nature than they are about the particulars of the current debates in the field. Most relevant to a British journal, we shall attempt to ‘step outside the hermeneutic circle', and suggest which aspects of contemporary American political science are most relevant to British political scientists.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlmondG. A.ColemanJ. S. (eds) (1960) The Politics of Developing Areas (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
2.
ArrowK. (1989) ‘Economic theory and the hypothesis of rationality’, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics: Utility and Probability. (New York: W. W. Norton).
3.
BatesR. H. (1981) Markets and States in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies (Berkeley: University of California Press).
4.
BatesR. H. (1988) ‘Contra contractarianism: Some reflections on the new institutionalism’, Politics and Society, 16.
5.
BatesR. H. (1997) ‘Area studies and the discipline: A useful controversy?’PS: Political Science and Politics, 30, 166–169.
6.
BatesR. H.GriefA. AnverLeviM.RosenthalJ. L.WeingastB. R. (1998) Analytic Narratives (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
7.
BermanS. (1998) The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
8.
BlackD. (1950) ‘The unity of political and economic science’, Economic Journal, 60, 506–514.
9.
BrittanS. (1975) ‘The economic contradictions of democracy’, British Journal of Political Science, 5, 129–159.
10.
CardosoF. H.FalettoE. Enzo (1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America (Berkeley: University of California Press).
11.
DahlR. (1961) ‘The behavioral approach in political science: Epitaph for a monument to a successful protest’, American Political Science Review, 55, 763–771.
12.
Dos SantosT. (1970) ‘The structure of dependence’, American Economic Review, 60:2, 231–236.
13.
EastonD. (1986) ‘The analysis of political systems’, in MacridisR.BrownB. (eds), Comparative Politics: Notes and Readings (7th edn) (Chicago: Dorsey Press), 20–58.
14.
EvansP. (1979) Dependent Development: The Alliance of State, Multinational and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
15.
EvansP. (1989) ‘Predatory, developmental and other state apparatuses: A comparative political economy perspective on the Third World state’, Sociological Forum, 4:4, 561–587.
16.
EvansP.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT. (eds) (1985) Bringing the State Back in (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
17.
GarrettG.WeingastB. R. (1993) ‘Ideas, interests and institutions: Constructing the European Communities internal market’, in GoldsteinJ.KeohaneR. O. (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs. Institutions and Political Change. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 173–207.
18.
GoldsteinJ.KeohaneR. O. (eds) (1993) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press1993).
19.
GreenD. P.ShapiroI. (1993) Pathologies of Rational Choice: A Critique of Applications in Political Science (New Haven: Yale University Press).
HallP. A. (1986) Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France (New York: Oxford University Press).
22.
HallP. A. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning and the state’, Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296.
23.
HallP. A.TaylorR. C. R. (1996) ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’Political Studies, 44, 936–957.
24.
HarsanyiJ. (1969) ‘Rational choice models of behavior versus functionalist and conformist theories’World Politics, 22, 513–538.
25.
HuntingtonS. P. (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press).
26.
JohnsonC. (1997) ‘Perception versus observation, or the contributions of rational choice theory and area studies to contemporary political science’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 30, 170–174.
27.
KatzensteinP. (1985) Small States in World Markets (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
28.
KatznelsonI. (1998) ‘The doleful dance of policy and politics: Can historical institutionalism make a difference?’, American Political Science Review, 92:1, 191–197.
29.
KoelbleT. A. (1995) ‘The new institutionalism in political science and sociology’, Comparative Politics, 27:2, 231–243.
30.
KrasnerS. (1984) ‘Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics’, Comparative Politics, 16:2, 223–245.
31.
KurzerP. (1993) Business and Banking: Political Change and Economic Integration in Western Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
32.
LindbeckA. (1976) ‘Stabilization policy in open economies with endogenous politicians’, American Economic Review, 66, 1–19.
33.
LowensteinK. (1944) ‘Report on the Research Panel on Comparative Government’, American Political Science Review, 38, 540–548.
34.
LuceD. R.RaffiaH. (1957) Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey (New York: Wiley).
35.
MannM. (1984) ‘The autonomous power of the state’, Archives Europeennes de Sociologie25:19.
36.
MarchJ.OlsenJ. (1984) ‘The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life’, American Political Science Review, 78, 734–749.
37.
McKelveyR. (1976) ‘General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models’, Econometrica, 47, 1085–1111.
38.
MitchellT. (1991) ‘The limits of the state: Beyond state theories and their critics’, American Political Science Review, 85:1, 77–96.
39.
NordhausW. D. (1975) ‘The political business cycle’, Review of Economic Studies, 42, 169–190.
40.
NorthD. C.ThomasR. P. (1973) The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
41.
O'ConnorJ. R. (1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: St Martin's Press).
42.
OlsonM. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
43.
ParsonsT. (1951) The Social System (New York: Glencoe Press).
44.
PontussonJ. (1995) ‘From comparative public policy to political economy: Putting institutions in their place and taking interests seriously’, Comparative Political Studies, 28:1, 117–147.
45.
RostowW. W. (1956) ‘The take-off into self-sustained growth’, The Economic Journal66, 25–48.
46.
RostowW. W. (1967) The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
47.
SchellingsT. (1966) Arms and Influence (New Haven: Yale University Press).
48.
SchofieldN. (1978) ‘Instability of simple dynamic games’, Review of Economic Studies, 45, 575–594.
49.
SkocpolT. (1979) States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
50.
Social Science Research Council (1945) Social Science Research Council Annual Report of 1944–1945 (New York: Social Science Research Council).
51.
SteinmoS.ThelenK.LongstrethF. (eds) (1992) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
