The article shows the affinity of Simmel's formal sociology with Husserl's notion of eidetic science. This thesis is demonstrated by the corroboration of Simmel's revision of neo-Kantian epistemology for sociology with Husserl's phenomenology, and the parallel discussion of Simmel and Husserl concerning cognitive levels and exact and morphological eide. Simmel's analysis of dyads is explored as an exemplar of his eidetic insights. An important consequence of this demonstration is the vindication establishing the scientific legitimacy of Simmel's methodology regarding the sociology of the forms of association. Woven throughout is discussion concerning the doctrine of the complementarity of eidetic and empirical science. Simmel's methodology is shown to have been ahead of its time through conjoining these two modes of scientific investigation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HusserlEdmund1970a. Formal and Transcendental Logic, translated by CairnsDorion. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
2.
HusserlEdmund1970b. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, translated by CarrDavid. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
3.
HusserlEdmund1973. Experience and Judgment, edited by Ludwig Langrebe, translated by ChurchillJames S.AmeriksKarl. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
4.
HusserlEdmund1977. Phenomenological Psychology, translated by ScanlonJohn. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
5.
HusserlEdmund1982. Logical Investigations Volume II, translated by FindlayJ.N.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6.
HusserlEdmund1983. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, translated by KerstenF.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
7.
LevinasEmmanuel1973. The Theory of Intuition in Husserl's Phenomenology, translated by OrianneAndre. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
8.
LevineDonald N.1981. “Sociology's Quest for the Classics: The Case of Simmel.” Pp. 60–80 in The Future of the Sociological Classics, edited by RheaBuford. London: Georg Allen Unwin.
9.
LevineDonald N.1985. The Flight from Ambiguity.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10.
LevineDonald N.1989. “Simmel as a Resource for Sociological Metatheory.”, Sociological Theory7:2: 161–74.
11.
LevineDonald N.CarterEllwood B.MillerGorman Eleanor1976a. “Simmel's Influence on American Sociology, I.”, American Journal of Sociology81:4: 813–45.
12.
LevineDonald N.CarterEllwood B.MillerGorman Eleanor1976b. “Simmel's Influence on American Sociology, II.”, American Journal of Sociology81:5: 1112–32.
13.
Merleau-PontyMaurice1964. Signs, translated by McClearyRichard C.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
14.
OakesGuy1988. Weber and Rickert.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
15.
PsathasGeorge1973. “Introduction.” Pp. 3–4 in Phenomenological Sociology, edited by PsathasGeorge. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16.
von SchillerFriederich1966. Two Essays by Friederich von Schiller, translated by EliasJulias A.. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.
17.
SchutzAlfred1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World, translated by WalshGeorgeLehnertFrederick. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
18.
SchutzAlfredLuckmanThomas1973. The Structures of the Life-World, translated by ZanerRichard M.TristramEngelhardt H.Jr.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
19.
SimmelGeorg1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. translated, edited, and introduction by WolffKurt H.. New York: The Free Press.
20.
SimmelGeorg1955. Conflict and The Web of Group Affiliations, translated by WolffKurt H.BendixReinhard. New York: The Free Press.
21.
SimmelGeorg1971. Georg Simmel On Individuality and Social Forms. edited by LevineDonald N.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
SimmelGeorg1990. The Philosophy of Money, edited by David Frisby, translated by BottomoreTomFrisbyDavid. London: Routledge.
23.
SokolowskiRobert1970. The Formation of Husserl's Concept of Constitution. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
24.
SokolowskiRobert1974. Husserlian Meditations.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
25.
SteinhoffMaria1925. “Die Form als soziologische Grundkategorie bei G. Simmel.” Pp. 214–59 in Kölner Vierteljahrshefte für Soziologie IV, 1924–1925.
26.
WeingartnerRudolph H.1962. Experience and Culture: The Philosophy of Georg Simmel.Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University University Press.
