By studying Dürkheim through a Schopenhauerian lens, the one-sidedly cognitivist and functionalist reception of his social theory can be balanced. Durkheim explicitly rejected such monistic interpretations. His dialectical approach was always aimed at an essentially dualistic perception of man and society, wherein the lower pole, the individual, is central. In Durkheim's symbol theory, this position leads to two kinds of symbols: those that are bound to the human body, here called “this and that” symbols, and those people can choose freely, here called “this for that” symbols. This twofold symbol theory can already be found in medieval philosophy (e.g. Dante Alighieri) as well as in the work of Paul Ricoeur. For Durkheim the human person is the symbol par excellence. By implication the rituals in which the person is (re)constructed, that is the rites of passage, should be central. The interpretation here opens up new perspectives for a more psychological interpretation of Durkheim's sociology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlpertHarry [1939]1993. Émile Dürkheim and His Sociology.Brookfield: Gregg Revivals.
2.
AlpertHarry1957/1958. “Émile Durkheim: Enemy of Fixed Psychological Elements.”The American Journal of Sociologylxiii:662–64.
3.
AlpertHarry1973. “Review of Émile Durkheim: His Life and Work by Steven Lukes.”, Contemporary Sociology12:198–200.
4.
ArièsPh1983. The Hour of Our Death.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
5.
BarghJohn A.1992. “The Ecology of Automaticity: Toward Establishing the Conditions Needed to Produce Automatic Processing Effects. Special Issue: Views and Varieties of Automaticity.”, American Journal of Psychology105(2):181–99.
6.
BourdieuPierre1990. The Logic of Practice.Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
7.
ByrneNoel T.1976. “Émile Durkheim as Symbolic Interactionist.”, Sociological Symposium16:25–43.
8.
CanettiElias1962. Crowds and Power.New York: Viking Press.
9.
ChampionF.Hervieu-LégerD.1990. De l'Émotion en Religions: Renouveaux et Traditions.Paris: Centurion.
10.
AlighieriDante1912. The Convivio of Dante Alighieri, translated by WicksteedPhilip H.. London: J.M. Dent and Sons.
DurkheimÉmile [1885a]1978. “Schaeffle, A., ‘Bau und Leben des sozialen Körpers: Erster Band.'” In Émile Durkheim on Institutional Analysis, edited by MarkTraugott. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
DurkheimÉmile [1885b]1975. “La Sociology selon Guplowicz.” Pp. 344–55 in Émile Durkheim: Textes, Volume 1, edited by VictorKarady. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
14.
DurkheimÉmile [1887]1975. “La Science Positive de la Morale en Allemagne.” Pp. 267–343 in Émile Durkheim: Textes, Volume 1, edited by VictorKarady. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
15.
DurkheimÉmile1893. De la Division du Travail Social.Paris: Alcan.
16.
DurkheimÉmile [1893]1984. The Division of Labor in Society, translated by HallsW. D.. New York: The Free Press.
17.
DurkheimÉmile [1897b]1975. “Lettre a Célestin Bouglé: 6 juillet 1897.” Pp. 399–402 in Émile Durkheim: Textes, Volume 2, edited by VictorKarady. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
18.
DurkheimÉmile [1898]1982. “Letter to the Editor of the American Journal of Sociology.” Pp. 251–52 in The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method, edited by StevenLukes. New York: The Free Press.
19.
DurkheimÉmile [1900]1960. “Sociology and Its Scientific Field.” In Émile Durkheim (1858–1917): A Collection of Essays, with Translations and a Bibliography, edited by WolffKurt H.. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
20.
DurkheimÉmile [1906a]1953. “The Determination of Moral Facts.” Pp. 35–62 in Sociology and Philosophy, translated by PockockD. F.. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
21.
DurkheimÉmile [1906b]1973. “G. Aslan, La Morale de Guyau.” Pp. 636–38 in StevenLukes, Émile Durkheim: His Life and Work.London: Penguin Books.
22.
DurkheimÉmile [1911]1924. “Jugements de Valeur et Jugements de Realité.” Pp. 117–42 in Sociologie et Philosophie, edited by BougléCelestin. Paris: Alcan.
23.
DurkheimÉmile [1911]1953. “Value Judgements and Judgements of Reality.” Pp. 80–97 in Sociology and Philosophy, translated by PockockD. F.. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
24.
DurkheimÉmile [1912]1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, translated by FieldsKaren E.. New York: The Free Press.
25.
DurkheimÉmile [1914]1960. “The Dualism of Human Nature and Its Social Conditions.” Pp. 325–40 in Émile Durkheim (1858–1917): A Collection of Essays, with Translations and a Bibliography, edited by WolffKurt H.. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
26.
DurkheimÉmile [1924]1953. Sociology and Philosophy, translated by PockockD.F.. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
27.
DurkheimÉmile [1955]1983. Pragmatism and Sociology, translated by WhitehouseJ.C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
EllenbergerHenri E.1970. The Discovery of the Unconscious.Basic Books.
29.
FarrRobert M.1978. “On the Varieties of Social Psychology.”, Social Science Information17:503–25.
30.
FarrRobertMoscoviciSerge, eds. 1984. Social Representations.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
FillouxJ. C.1965/1966. “Notes sur Durkheim et la Psychologie.”Bulletin de Psychologiexix:40–51.
32.
GeertzClifford1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays.New York: Basic Books.
33.
GreenwaldAnthony G.BanajiMahzarin R.1995. “Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and Stereotypes.”, Psychological Review102(1):4–27.
34.
HertzRobert [1906]1960. Death and the Right Hand.Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
35.
HinkleR.Jr.1960. “Durkheim in American Sociology.” Pp. 267–95 in Émile Durkheim (1858–1917): A Collection of Essays, with Translations and a Bibliography, edited by WolffKurt H.. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
36.
HollanderR.1969. Allegory in Dante's Commedia.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37.
KempenHarry J. G.1996. “Mind as Body Moving in Space: Bringing the Body Back into Self-Psychology.”, Theory & Psychology6(4):717–33.
38.
KretzmannNorman1967. “History of Semantics.” Pp. 358–405 in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. VII, edited by EdwardsPaul. New York: Macmillan.
39.
LehmannJennifer M.1993. Deconstructing Durkheim: A Post-Post-Structuralist Critique.New York: Routledge.
40.
Lévi-StraussClaude1962. Le Totémisme Aujourd'hui.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
LukesSteven1973. Émile Durkheim: His Life and Work.London: Penguin Books.
43.
MaussMarcel [1950]1979. Sociology and Psychology.London: Routledge.
44.
MestrovicStjepan G.1984. “Durkheim's Concept of the Unconscious.”, Current Perspectives is Social Theory5:267–88.
45.
MestrovicStjepan G.1988. Émile Durkheim and the Reformation of Sociology.Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
46.
MestrovicStjepan G.1989a. “Rethinking the Will and Idea of Sociology in the light of Schopenhauer's Philosophy.”, British Journal of Sociology40(2):271–93.
47.
MestrovicStjepan G.1989b. “Reappraising Durkheim's ‘Elementary Forms of the Religious Life’ in the Context of Schopenhauer's Philosophy.”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion28(3):255–72.
48.
MestrovicStjepan G.1991. The Coming Fin de Siècle.London: Routledge.
49.
MestrovicStjepan G.1992. Durkheim and Postmodern Culture.Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
50.
MestrovicStjepan G.1993. The Barbarian Temperament.London: Routledge.
PeristianyJ.G.1953. “Introduction.” Pp. vii–xxxii in Émile Durkheim, Sociology and Philosophy, translated by PockockD.F.. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
53.
PickeringW.1984. Durkheim's Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
54.
PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS.1997. “Why Do We Need What We Need? A Terror Management Perspective on the Roots of Human Social Motivation.”, Psychological Inquiry8(1):1–20.
55.
SchopenhauerArthur [1818]1969. The World as Will and Representation, vols. I and II.New York: Dover Publications.
56.
SchopenhauerArthur [1836]1992. On the Will in Nature.New York: Berg.
57.
SimmelGeorg [1907]1986. Schopenhauer and Nietzsche.Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
58.
SingletonCharles1954. Dante's Comedia: Elements of Structure.London: The John Hopkins University Press.
59.
SmithW. Robertson1894. Lectures on the Religion of the Semites.London: Adam and Charles Black.
60.
StoetzelJ.1963. La Psychologie Sociale.Paris: Flammarion.
61.
StoneG.FarbermanH.1967. “On the Edge of Rapprochement: Was Durkheim Moving Toward the Perspective of Symbolic Interaction?”, The Sociological Quarterly8:149–64.
62.
TambiahS.1969. “Animals Are Good to Think and Good to Prohibit.”, Ethnology8:423–59.
63.
UlinRobert C.1984. Understanding Cultures: Perspectives in Anthropology and Social Theory.Austin: University of Texas Press.
64.
Van GennepA. [1909]1960. Les Rites de Passage. Étude Systématique des Rites.Paris: Librairie Critique.
65.
VerheggenTheo1996. “Durkheim's Représentations Considered as Vorstellungen.”, Current Perspectives in Social Theory16:189–219.
66.
WalterT.1990. Funerals: And How to Improve Them.London: Hodder and Stoughton.
