The backlash against affirmative action is gaining political momentum as liberalism's defenses are overwhelmed. This article utilizes critical race theory (CRT) to present a counter-argument to both conservative calls for color blindness and the incrementalism of traditional liberalism. Using Washington State's Initiative 200 as a case study, it argues that CRT not only can inform the debate over affirmative action, but has the potential to reinvigorate multiculturalism's social activist roots.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AraujoR. J. (1997). Critical race theory: Contributions to and problems for race relations. Gonzaga Law Review, 32 (3), 537–575.
2.
BanksJ. A. (1984). Multicultural education and its critics: Britain and the United States. The New Era, 65, 58–65.
3.
Because it's bad for business. (1998, September 6). The Seattle Times, pp. A22.
4.
BellD. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93, 518.
5.
BellD. (1990). Racial realism—After we're gone: Prudent speculations on America in a post-racial epoch. St. Louis Law Journal, 34, 393.
6.
BellD. (1992). Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism.New York: Basic Books.
7.
BellD. (1995). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest convergence dilemma. In CrenshawK., GotandaN., PellerG., & ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed that movement.New York: The New Press.
8.
BondJ. (1991). Reconstruction and the Southern movement for civil rights—Then and now. Teachers College Record, 93 (2), 221–235.
9.
BowenW. G., & BokD. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BronnerE. (1998, September 9). Study strongly supports affirmative action in admissions to elite colleges. The New York Times, A24.
11.
BrooksR. L., & NewbornM. J. (1994). Critical race theory and classical liberal civil rights scholarship: A distinction without a difference. California Law Review, 82 (4), 787–845.
12.
BrownW. R. (1992). The convergence of neutrality and choice: The limits of the state's affirmative duty to provide equal educational opportunity. Tennessee Law Review, 60, 63–133.
13.
BruneT. (1998, February 9). Nearly half of all affirmative action hires are white. The Seattle Times [On-line], www.seattletimes.com.
14.
BruneT. (1998, July 3). I-200 backers faulted over gifts. The Seattle Times, pp. B1, B2.
15.
BruneT., & SerranoB. A. (1998, December 12). Signature gatherers, their race become issues Initiative 200 effort. The Seattle Times, A1, A22.
16.
CalmoreJ. O. (1995a). Critical race theory, Archie Shepp, and fire music: Securing an authentic intellectual life in a multicultural world. In CrenshawK. W., GotandaN., PellerG., & ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical Race Theory (pp. 315–329). New York: The New Press.
17.
CalmoreJ. O. (1995b). Racialized space and the culture of segregation: “Hewing a stone of hope from a mountain of despair.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 143, 1233–1273.
18.
Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883).
19.
CrenshawK. W. (1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101 (7), 1331–1387.
20.
CrenshawK. W. (1995). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In CrenshawK. W., GotandaN., PellerG., & ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 357–383). New York: The New Press.
21.
DelgadoR. (1989). Legal storytelling: Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2411.
22.
DelgadoR. (Ed.). (1995). Critical Race Theory: The cutting edge.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23.
EganT. (1997, December 17). Blacks recruited by “rights” drive to end preferences. The New York Times, A12.
24.
FarberD. A., & SherryS. (1995). Telling stories out of school: An essay on legal narratives. In DelgadoR. (Ed.), Critical Race Theory: The cutting edge (pp. 283–292). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25.
FarberD. A., & SherryS. (1997). Beyond all reason: The radical assault on truth in American Law.New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
FeinbergW. (1997). Affirmative action and beyond: A case for a backward-looking gender and race-based policy. Teachers College Record, 97 (3), 362–381.
27.
FosterH. (1997, December 31). I-200 nets signatures—and a controversy. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, A1, A4.
28.
FosterH. (1998, September 14). Most in poll support I-200. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, A1, A4.
HarrisC. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1721.
31.
HelmsJ. E. (1990). Black and white identity: Theory, research, and practice.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
32.
HolmesS. (1998, November 10). Victorious preference foes look for new battlefields. The New York Times, A23.
33.
Initiative process compromised again. (1997, December 17). The Seattle Times, p. A16.
34.
JohnsonA. M. (1994). Defending the use of narrative and giving content to the voice of color: Rejecting the imposition of process theory in legal scholarship. Iowa Law Review, 79 (4), 803–852.
35.
KennedyR. (1995). Racial critiques of legal academia. In DelgadoR. (Ed.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 432–450). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
36.
KingM. (1997, November 13). Debate over affirmative action moves to this state. The Seattle Times [On-line], www.seattletimes.com.
37.
KozinskiA. (1998, November 2). Bending the law: Are radical multiculturalists poisoning young legal minds? [Review of the book Beyond all reason: The radical assault on truth in American Law]. The New York Times Review of Books, 46.
38.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994, April). Your blues ain't like mine: Keeping issues of race on the multicultural agenda. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
39.
Ladson-BillingsG., & TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47–68.
40.
LawrenceC. R., MatsudaM. J., DelgadoR., & CrenshawK. W. (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the First Amendment.Boulder: Westview Press.
41.
LawrenceS. M., & TatumB. D. (1997). Teachers in transition: The impact of antiracist professional development on classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 99 (1), 162–178.
42.
LitowitzD. E. (1997). Some critical thoughts on critical race theory. Notre Dame Law Review, 72 (2), 503–529.
43.
LoewenJ. W. (1995). Lies my teacher told me.New York: Simon & Schuster
44.
OlivasM. (1990). The chronicles, my grandfather's stories, and immigration law: The slave traders chronicle and racial history. St. Louis Law Journal, 34, 425.
45.
PostmanD., & BruneT. (1998, July 12). Across state, thirst is strong for reforming affirmative action. The Seattle Times, A1, A8–9.
46.
PostmanD., & MapesL. V. (1998, February 10). I-200 lacks lawmakers’ votes; it's likely headed for ballot. The Seattle Times, A1, A7.
47.
RubinE. L. (1996). The new legal process, the synthesis of discourse, and the microanalysis of institutions. Harvard Law Review, 109 (6), 1393–1438.
48.
SchofieldJ. W. (1986). Causes and consequences of the colorblind perspective. In DovidioJ. F., & GaertmerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 231–253). San Diego: Academic Press.
49.
SerranoB. A. (1998, February 4). Carlson out at KVI over I-200 focus. The Seattle Times, A1, A10.
50.
SleeterC. E. (1993). How white teachers construct race. In McCarthyC., & CrichlowW. (Eds.), Race identity and representation in education (pp. 157–172). New York: Routledge.
51.
SleeterC. E. (1996). Multicultural education as social activism.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
52.
SnidermanP. M., & CarminesE. G. (1997). Reaching beyond race.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
TateW. (1997). Critical race theory in education: History, theory, and implications. In AppleM. W. (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 195–247). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
54.
TatumB. D. (1994). Teaching white students about racism: The search for white allies and the restoration of hope. Teachers College Record, 95 (4), 462–476.
55.
TaylorE. (1998a). Critical race theory and interest convergence in the desegregation of higher education. In ParkerL. (Ed.), Race is … Race isn't: Critical Race Theory and qualitative studies in education.Westview Press.
56.
TaylorE. (1998b). Critical Race Theory, a primer. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 6, 122–125.
57.
TaylorQ. (1994). The forging of a black community: Seattle's central district from 1870 through the civil rights era.Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
58.
TushnetM. V. (1996). The “We've done enough” theory of school desegregation. Howard Law Journal, 39 (3), 767–779.
59.
VerhovekS. H. (1999, September 17). Gates, “spreading the wealth,” makes scholarship gift official. The New York Times, A19.
60.
Washington State Commission on African American Affairs. (1995, November). Affirmative action: Who's really benefiting? Part II on public higher education.
61.
Washington State Higher Education Coordinating Board. (1987). The Washington state master plan for higher education.Olympia, WA: Higher Education Coordinating Board.
62.
Washington State Higher Education Coordinating Board. (1996, April). Briefing paper on affirmative action and diversity.Olympia, WA: Higher Education Coordinating Board.
63.
Washington State Higher Education Coordinating Board. (1997, December). 1997 statewide progress report on diversity and participation of people of color in higher education.Olympia, WA: Higher Education Coordinating Board.
64.
WestC. (1995). Foreword. In CrenshawK., GotandaN., PellerG., & ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical Race Theory: The key writings that formed that movement (pp. xi–xii). New York: The New Press.
WilliamsP. J. (1991). The alchemy of race and rights: Diary of a law professor.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
WingA. K. (1996). Critical race feminism and the international human rights of women in Bosnia, Palestine, and South Africa: Issues for LatCrit Theory. University of Miami Inter American Law Review, 28 (2), 337–360.
