Swelling Properties of Various Polymers Used in Controlled Release Systems

Abstract

The effect of powder packing and porosity of specimens on the swelling properties of polymeric materials was studied, in various swelling liquids, such as distilled water and 0.1 N hydrochloric acid solution. Capsules, tablets and films of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, poly(ethylene oxide) and sodium alginate were prepared and their weight uptake after immersion into the above solutions was recorded as a function of time, in order to assess the swelling process. Measurements of some characteristics of the as received powders were also performed as an attempt to classify the specimens prepared according to their porosity.

Within the experimental conditions of this work, it was shown that the porosity of polymeric specimens is a dominant factor that controls their swelling behaviour. Increased porosity leads to fast initial rates of weight uptake and high extent of equilibrium swelling. On the other hand, dissolution and possible degradation of polymers susceptible to acid hydrolysis, results in some variations from the above-mentioned behaviour.

With respect to the application in controlled release systems, the overall delivery rate from a polymeric specimen is expected to be a function of both swelling and disintegration characteristics of a specimen and, therefore, the weight uptake can be considered a measure of the release only in the case of polymers with low water solubility and increased stability to hydrolysis.

Keywords

controlled release swelling diffusion power packing porosity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Lee, P.I. , 1983. “Dimensional changes during release from glassy hydrogel matrix”, Polym. Commun., 24: 45-45.

2. Huglin, M.B. , I.B. Yahya and M. Zakaria . 1982. “Purity of cross-linkers for polymeric hydrogel preparation”, Polymer, 23: 340-340.

3. Hecht, A.M. and E. Geissler . 1980. “The friction coefficient in deswelling gels”, Polymer, 21: 1358-1358.

4. Watase, M. , K. Nishihari and M. Mambu . 1983. “Rheological properties of an anomalous poly(vinyl alcohol) gel”, Polym. Commun., 24: 52-52.

5. Nishihari, K. , M. Watase and K. Ogino , 1983. “Simple extension of poly(vinyl alcohol) gels”, Polym. Commun., 24: 345-345.

6. Andreopoulos, A.G. , 1989. “Preparation and swelling of polymeric hydrogels”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 37: 2121-2121.

7. Andreopoulos, A.G. 1989. “Properties of poly(2-hydroxyethyl acrylate) hydrogels”, Biomaterials, 10: 101-101.

8. Nitsch, M.J. and U.V. Banakar . 1994. “Implantable drug delivery”, J. Biomater. Appl., 8: 247–284.

9. Flory, P.J. 1975. Principles of Polymer Chemistry, Cornell Univ. Press, 9th Edn., p. 579-579.

10.

10. Bray, J.C. and E.D. Merrill . 1973. “Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels. Formation by electron beam irradiation of aqueous solutions and subsequent crystallization”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 17: 37709-37709.

11.

11. Barton, J.M. 1979. “Effect of absorbed water on the thermal relaxation of biaxially stretched cross-linked poly(methyl methacrylate)”, Polymer, 20: 1018-1018.

12.

12. Graham, N.B. , N.E. Nwachuku and D.J. Walsh . 1982. “Interaction of poly(ethylene oxide) with solvents: 1. Preparation and swelling of cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide) hydrogel”, Polymer, 23: 1345-1345.

13.

13. Andreopoulos, A.G. 1992. “Preparation of hydrophilic polymer networks by post curing process”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 45: 1005-1005.

14.

14. Vlachou, M. , N.H. Choulis , M. Efentakis and A.G. Andreopoulos . 1996. “The effect of modification of acrylic resins on controlled release and bioadhesion”, J. Biomater. Appl., 10: 217-217.

15.

15. Buckton, G. , A. Kee and M. Efentakis . 1996. “The interaction between hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and sodium dodecyl sulfate”, J. Pharm. Sci., 1: 1–2.

16.

16. Efentakis, M. , E.C. Hatzi and A.G. Andreopoulos , 1998. “Development, evaluation and release characteristics in vitro of oral mucosal bioadhesive matrices containing tetracycline for application to the oral cavity”, S.T.P. Pharma. Sciences, 8: 22-22.

17.

17. Vlachou, M. , N. Hani , M. Efentakis , P.A. Tarantili and A.G. Andreopoulos , 2000, “Polymers for use in controlled release systems: The effect of surfactants on their swelling properties”, Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 15: 1, pp. 65–77.

18.

18. Sanghvi, P.P. , C.C. Collins and A.J. Shukla , 1993. “Evaluation of preflo modified starches as new direct compression excipients. 1. Tabletting characteristics”, Pharm. Res., 10: 1597-1597.

19.

19. Vergnaud, J.M. 1993. “Liquid transport controlled release process in polymeric materials: Applications to oral dosage forms”, Int. J. Phar., 90: 89-89.

20.

20. Edube, N.K. et al. 1997. “Sustained release of acetaminophen from heterogeneous matrix tablets: Influence of polymer ratio, polymer loading and co-active on drug release”, Pharm. Dev. Technol., 2: 161-161.