This paper reviews work that has led to the development of a number of multi-zonal airflow models (network models). At present, the network analysis and perturbation methods cannot be used to solve the interstitial flow, pressure and resistance regimes. Network analysis and perturbation may suggest that such flows exist, but the complexity and workmanship dependence of the interstitial flow, pressure and resistance regime requires direct measurement. In other words, at present, the boundary conditions of the interstitial regime can be defined analytically using traditional methods, but the pressures and flows within the interstitial spaces cannot be predicted with certainty using analytical means.
Difficulties in obtaining the detailed information on mechanical systems and the leakage areas of building assemblies make the traditional approach of measuring airflows and constructing models using leakage areas impractical for diagnostic purposes. Additionally, a pressure difference across an assembly alone, where interstitial pressures are not considered, is not enough to describe performance of the building envelope. The interstitial air pressures are usually small and until recently have been beyond measurement.
Research on building envelope durability and indoor air quality has shown the significance of these small, but persisting interstitial air pressure fields. To enhance the capability of network models, a relational model was developed. This approach permits the measured building air pressure field to be used with the network analysis. Furthermore, the response of the analytical model is calibrated by comparing the effect of a specific perturbation on both the building air pressure field and the analytical model.
This paper is written in two parts, the first reviewing issues in prediction of airflow in the buildings and building envelope, the second analyzing the actual data of measured pressure response of buildings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acres Consulting Services Ltd.
; Phase I—Collaborative Design Project Elliot Lake Housing, Evaluation of Existing Experience in Building Construction Relative to Indoor Radon Levels, Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, August 7, 1981.
2.
ASHRAE
; Fundamentals Handbook, Atlanta, 1997.
3.
Axley, J.
and Grot, R.; The Coupled Air Flow and Thermal Analysis Problem in Building Airflow System Simulation, Proceedings ASHRAE Symposium on Calculation of Interzonal Heat and Mass Transport in Buildings, ASHRAE Transactions, 95 (2), 1989.
4.
Barker, A.H.
; The Theory and Practice of Heating andVentilation, The Carton Press, 199, Strand, W.C., London, 1912.
5.
Blasnik, M.
and Fitzerald, J.; Pressure Diagnostics—Diagnosing Complex Air Leakage Paths: A New Approach Using Blower Door Induced Pressures, May, 1992.
6.
Bomberg, M.
and Kumaran, M.K.; A Test Method to Determine Air Flow Resistance of Exterior Membranes and Sheathing, Building Research Note No. 227, National Research Council, Ottawa, April, 1985.
7.
Bumbaru, D.
; Jutras, R.; and Patenaude, A.; Air Permeance of Building Materials, Research Project, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, ON, June, 1988.
8.
Burnett, E.
and Straube, J.; Vents, Ventilation Drying and Pressure Moderation, Research Project, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, ON, December, 1995.
9.
Cummings, J.B.
and Tooley, J.J.; Infiltration Rates and Pressure Differences in Florida Homes Caused by Closed Interior Doors When the Central Air Handler is On, Passive Solar Conference, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
10.
Cummings, J.B.
and Tooley, J.J.; Infiltration and Pressure Differences Induced by Forced Air Systems in Florida Residences, ASHRAE Transactions, June, 1989.
11.
Cummings, J.B.
; Tooley, J.J.; and Moyer, N.A.; Impacts of Duct Leakage on Infiltration Rates, Space Conditioning Energy Use, and Peak Electrical Demand, Proceedings of the ACEEE 1990 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, August, 1990.
12.
Currie, I.G.
; Fundamental Mechanics of Fluids, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1974.
13.
Dalgliesh, W.A.
; Wind Loads on Low Buildings, Building Practice Note 18, Division of Building Research, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, January, 1981.
14.
Dalgliesh, W.A.
and Schriever, W.R.; Wind Pressures on Buildings, CBD34, Canadian Building Digest, Division of Building Research, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, October, 1962.
15.
Davenport, A.G.
; Wind Loads on Structures, NRCC 5576, Division of Building Research, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, March, 1960.
16.
Davenport, A.G.
and Hui, H.Y.; External and Internal Wind Pressures on Claddings of Buildings, Boundary LayerWindTunnel Laboratory, University ofWestern Ontario, London, Canada, 1982.
17.
Davenport, A.G.
and Isyumov, N.; The Application of the Boundary LayerWind Tunnel to the Prediction ofWind Loading, Proceedings, International Research Seminar onWind Effects on Building Structures, Ottawa, Canada, September, 1967.
18.
Emswiler, J.E.
; The Neutral Zone in Ventilation, ASHVE Journal, Vol. 32, 1926.
19.
Feustel, H.E.
; COMIS—AnInternational Multizone Air Flowand PollutantTransport Model, to be published in Energy & Buildings, 1998.
20.
Feustel, H.E.
and Dieris, J.; ASurvey of AirflowModels for Multizone Structures, Energy& Buildings, 18, pp. 79–100, 1992.
21.
Garden, G.K.
; Rain Penetration and Its Control, CBD 40, Canadian Building Digest, Division of Building Research, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, April, 1963.
22.
Grimsrud, D.T.
; Sherman, M.H.; Diamond, R.C.; Condon, P.H. and Rosenfeld, A.H.; Infiltration-Pressurization Correlations: Detailed Measurements on a California House, ASHRAE Symposium on Air Infiltration, Philadelphia, PA, January, 1979.
23.
Handegord, G.O.
; Active Systems for the Control of Condensation in Building Envelopes, CLIMA 2000, Sarajevo, August, 1989.
24.
Harrje, D.T.
; Gadsby, K.J. and Cromer, C.J.; Transients and Physics of Return Air, Proceedings of the Air Movement and Distribution Conference, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, May, 1986.
25.
Klote, J.H.
; Computer Modeling for Smoke Control Design, Fire Safety Journal9: 181–188, 1985.
26.
Kronvall, J.
; Air Flows in Building Components, Report TVBH-1002, Division of Building Technology, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden, 1980.
27.
Larson, G.L.
; Air Infliltration Through Various Types of Brick Wall Constructions, ASHVE Transactions, Vol. 35, pp 55–58, New York, 1929.
28.
Lawton, M.
and Quirouette, R.L.; Testing of Air Barrier Construction Details, Research Project, Report No. 30132.OR/2, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, ON, August, 1991.
29.
Liddament, M.
and Allen, C.; The Validation and Comparison of Mathematical Models of Air Infiltration, Technical Note 11, Air Infiltration Centre, Bracknell, Great Britain, 1983.
30.
Lin, J.X.
; Surry, D. and Inculet, D.R.; AStudy of the Characteristic Shapes of Mean Pressures and Their Gradients on Buildings in Realistic Surroundings, Report BLWT-SS3-1995, Faculty of Engineering Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, March, 1995.
Lstiburek, J.W.
; Two Studies of Mold and Mildew in Florida Buildings, Journal of Thermal Insulation and Building Envelopes, Volume 16, July, 1992.
34.
Lstiburek, J.W.
; Humidity Control in the Humid South, Workshop Proceedings—Bugs, Mold & Rot II, BETEC, Washington, DC, November, 1993.
35.
Lstiburek, J.W.
and Moyer, N.A.; Lakeland Nursing Home, Building Science Corporation—Client Report, November, 1991.
36.
Lstiburek, J.W.
; Pressure Response of Buildings, Thermal Performance of Buildings, Clearwater Beach, FL, December, 1999.
37.
Luck, J.R.
and Nelson, L.W.; TheVariation of Infiltration Rate with Relative Humidity in a Frame Building, ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 71, pp. 718–729, Atlanta, 1965.
38.
Lux, M.E.
and Brown, W.C.; Air Leakage Control, Proceedings of Building Science Insight ’86, NRCC 29943, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, January, 1989.
39.
Nelson, G.
; Personal Communication, 1982.
40.
Nelson, B.D.
; Robinson, D.A.; Nelson, G.D.; and Hutchinson, M.; Energy Efficient House Research Project, ORNL/Sub/83-47980/1, U.S. Department of Energy, September, 1986.
41.
Nylund, P.O.; Vindtathet hos fierskiktsvaggar (TheWindtightness of Multi-layerWalls), Byggmastaren, Number 11, National Swedish Board for Building Research, Stockholm, 1966.
42.
Nylund, P.O.
; Infiltration and Ventilation, Report D22: 1980, National Swedish Board for Building Research, Stockholm, 1980.
43.
Palmiter, L.S.
and Bond, T.C.; Modeled and Measured Infiltration, Ecotope, Inc., Seattle, WA, February, 1991.
44.
Palmiter, L.S.
; Bond, T.C. and Sherman, M.; Modeled and Measured Infiltration—A Detailed Case Study of Four Electrically Heated Homes, Electric Power Research Institute, ReportCU7327, Palo Alto, California, 1991.
45.
Palmiter, L.S.
; Brown, I.A. and Bond, T.C.; Measured Infiltration and Ventilation in 472 All-Electric Homes, ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 97, Atlanta, 1991.
46.
Persily, A.K.
and Linteris, G.T.; A Comparison of Measured and Predicted Infiltration Rates, ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 89, Atlanta, 1983.
47.
Quirouette, R.L.
; Testing Rainscreen Wall and Window Systems: The Cavity Excitation Method, Project No. J93r07f-4, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, November, 1996.
48.
Quirouette, R.L.
; The Dynamic Buffer Zone Wall System, Energy Efficient Building Association Annual Conference, Denver, 1997.
49.
Robinson, D.H.
and Lambert, L.A.; Field Investigation of Residential Infiltration and Heating Duct Leakage, Lambert Engineering, Inc., Bend, OR, 1987.
50.
Robinson, G.
and Baker, M.C.; Wind-Driven Rain and Buildings, Technical Paper No. 445 of the Division of Building Research, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, July, 1975.
51.
Scott, A.G.
; Comments on Subfloor Ventilation, Proceedings of the IIWorkshop on Radon and Radon Daughters in Urban Communities Associated with Uranium Mining and Processing, Report of the Atomic Energy Control Board, 1979.
52.
Sherman, M.H.
; Estimation of Infiltration from Leakage and Climate Indicators, Energy and Buildings, 10, Elsevier Sequoia, Netherlands, 1987.
53.
Sherman, M.H.
and Grimsrud, D.T.; Measurement of Infiltration Using Fan Pressurization andWeather Data, First Symposium of the Air Infiltration Centre, Windsor, England, October, 1980.
54.
Steel, F.
; Airtight Houses and Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, CBD 222, Canadian Building Digest, Division of Building Research, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, March, 1982.
55.
Stathopoulos, T.
; Surry, D.; and Davenport, A.G.; Internal Pressure Characteristics of Low Rise Buildings due toWind Action, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference onWind Engineering, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A., July, 1979.
56.
Stricker, S.
; Measurement of Air-Tightness of Houses, ASHRAE Transactions 81(Part 1): pp. 148–167, Atlanta, 1975.
57.
Swami, H.V.
and Chandra, S.; Procedures for Calculating Natural Ventilation Airflow Rates in Buildings, FSEC-CR-163-86, Florida Solar Energy Center, Cape Canaveral, Florida, 1987.
58.
Tamura, G.T.
; Computer Analysis of Smoke Movement in Tall Buildings, ASHRAE Transactions 75(Part 2): pp. 81–93, 1969.
59.
Tamura, G.T.
and Wilson, A.G.; Air Leakage and Pressure Measurements in Two Occupied Houses, ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 70, pp. 110–119, (NRCC 7758), Atlanta, 1964.
60.
Tamura, G.T.
and Wilson, A.G.; Pressure Differences for a Nine-Story Building a Result of Chimney Effect and Ventilation System Operation, ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 72, Atlanta, 1966.
61.
Timusk, J.
; Personal Communication, October, 1983.
62.
Timusk, J.
; Design, Construction and Performance of a DynamicWall House, 8th Air Infiltration Centre Conference, Uberlingen, FRG, September 24, 1987.
63.
Timusk, J.
; Seskus, A.L. and Ary, N.; Control ofWind Cooling ofWood Frame Building Enclosures, Excellence in Housing Conference, EEBA, Portland, ME, April, 1988.
64.
Tooley, J.J.
and Davis, B.E.; Power Attic Ventilation—Another Applied Building Science Nightmare and Treasure Trove, ACEEE, Santa Cruz, CA, August, 1994.
65.
Tooley, J.J.
and Moyer, N.A.; Mechanical Air Distribution and Interacting Relationships, Florida Home Energy Reviews of Orlando, Orlando, Florida, February, 1988.
66.
Tooley, J.J.
and Moyer, N.A.; Personal Communication, 1989.
67.
Walker, I.S.
and Wilson, D.J.; FieldValidation of Algebraic Equations for Stack andWind Driven Air Infiltration Calculations, International Journal of Heating, Ventilating, Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Research, Volume 4, Number 2, April, 1998.
68.
Walton, G.N.
; AirflowNetwork Models for Element-Based AirflowModeling, ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 95, Part 2, Atlanta, 1989.
69.
Walton, G.N.
; CONTAM96, NISTIR 6056, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, Gaithersburg, MD, September, 1997.
70.
White, J.
; Ventilation Troubled Houses—Status and Trends, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, Canada, June, 1983.
71.
Wilson, A.G.
; Air Leakage in Buildings, CBD 23, Canadian Building Digest, Division of Building Research, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, November, 1961.
