An Investigation into the Accuracy of a One-Parameter Nonlinear Model for Unidirectional Composites

Abstract

The nonlinear response of unidirectional composites has often been modeled using orthotropic plasticity theories. Of these, the one-parameter model developed by Sun and Chen is the simplest and hence attractive from the point of view of applications. The range of applicability of this theory is investigated by performing a number of off-axis tension tests on laminae, shear tests on 0°/90° laminates and uniaxial tension tests on +45°/–45° laminates. The theory appears to explain the results of off-axis tension test of laminae, but is unable to accommodate the full range of stress-strain response observed in the case of laminates. This is clearly due to extensive micro-cracking that laminates with orthogonal fiber orientations are able to withstand prior to failure—a phenomenon the single parameter model is not designed to account for. Nevertheless, it appears from the limited number of results presented, that the model if properly calibrated, can be used to predict the behavior of both laminae and laminates with reasonable accuracy.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Hahn, H. T. and Tsai, S. W. 1973. “Nonlinear Elastic Behavior of Unidirectional Composite Laminae,” Journal of Composite Materials, 7:102–118.

2. Schapery, R. A. 1987. “Deformation and Fracture Characterization of Inelastic Composite Materials Using Potentials,” Polymer Engineering and Science, 27:63–76.

3. Schapery, R. A. 1989. “Mechanical Characterization and Analysis of Inelastic Composite Laminates with Growing Damage,” in Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures, J. N. Reddy and J. L. Tapley , eds., AMD-100, ASME, New York, pp. 1–9.

4. Schapery, R. A. 1989. “A Method for Mechanical State Characterization of Inelastic Composite Laminates with Damage,” Advances in Fracture Research, ICF7, 3:2177–2189.

5. Schapery, R. A. 1990. “A Theory of Mechanical Behavior of Elastic Media with Growing Damage and Other Changes in Structure,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 38(2):215–253.

6. Christensen, R. M. 1979. Mechanics of Composite Materials, Wiley-Interscience, New York.

7. Sun, C. T. and Chen, J. L. 1989. “A Simple Flow Rule for Characterizing Nonlinear Behavior of Fiber Composites,” Journal of Composite Materials, 23:1009–1020.

8. Budiansky, B. and Fleck, N. 1993. “Compressive Failure of Fiber Composites,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 41:183–211.

9. Sun, C. T. and Yoon, K. J. 1992. “Elastic-Plastic Analysis of Composite Laminate Using a One-Parameter Plasticity Model,” Journal of Composite Materials, 26:293–308.

10.

10. Sun, C. T. and Tao, J. 1998. “Prediction of Failure Envelopes and Stress/Strain Behavior of Composite Laminates,” Composites Science and Technology, 58:1125–1136.

11.

11. Walrath, D. E. and Adams, D. F. 1983. “The Iosipescu Shear Test as Applied to Composite Materials,” Experimental Mechanics, 23:105–110.

12.

12. Jadhav, V. R. 2000. “Micro-Mechanical Analysis of Nonlinear Response of Unidirectional Composites,” D. Sc. Thesis, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.

13.

13. Reifsnider, K. L. , Hennekke, E. G. , Stinchcomb, W. W. and Duke, J. C. 1982. “Damage Mechanics and NDE of Composite Laminates,” in Mechanics of Composite Materials, Recent Advances, pp. 399–420, Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Mechanics of Composite Materials, Ed. Z. Hashin and C. T. Herakovich .