Quantitative Radiographic Analysis of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites

Abstract

X-ray radiographic examination of the bone fracture healing process is a widely used method in the treatment and management of patients. Medical devices made of metallic alloys reportedly produce considerable artifacts that make the interpretation of radiographs difficult. Fiber reinforced polymer composite materials have been proposed to replace metallic alloys in certain medical devices because of their radiolucency, light weight, and tailorable mechanical properties. The primary objective of this paper is to provide a comparable radiographic analysis of different fiber reinforced polymer composites that are considered suitable for biomedical applications. Composite materials investigated consist of glass, aramid (Kevlar-29), and carbon reinforcement fibers, and epoxy and polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) matrices. The total mass attenuation coefficient of each material was measured using clinical X-rays (50 kev). The carbon fiber reinforced composites were found to be more radiolucent than the glass and kevlar fiber reinforced composites.

Keywords

radiolucency fiber reinforced polymer composite material total mass attenuation coefficient (TMAC)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Wytch, R. , Ashcroft, G. P. , McKenzie, G. , Wardlaw, D. and Ledingham, W. M. , 1991, “Radiographic assessment of splinting bandages”, Injury: The British Journal of Accident Surgery, 22(1): 41–44.

2. Skalak, R. and Chien, S. , 1987, Handbook of Bioengineering, McGraw-Hill.

3. Okudera, H. , Kobayashi, S. , Kyoshima, K. et al., 1994, “New Radiolucent Head Fixation Made of Engineering Plastics for Intraoperative CT Scanning”, Acta Neurochirurgica, 127(1–2): 121–123.

4. Claes, L. , Wolf, S. , Schultheiss, M. , Wilke, H. J. , Arand, M. and Kinzl, L. , 1999, “A new radiolucent system for vertebral body replacement: Its stability in comparison to the other system”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 48(1): 82–89.

5. Ciappetta, P. , Boriani, S. and Paolo, G. , 1997, “A carbon fiber reinforced polymer cage for vertebral body replacement: technical note”, Neurosurgery, 41(5): 1203–1206.

6. Compton and Allison , 1935, X-rays in Theory and Experiment, McMillan.

7. Rowley, D. I. , Pratt, D. J. and Powell, E. S. , 1985, “The comparative properties of plaster-of-Paris and plaster-of-Paris substitutes”, Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 103: 40-40.

8. Mass-attenuation XDB software, Nuclear Microscopy Division, NUS, Singapore.

9. Golvakovsky, V. and Frankel, V. H. , 1993, Operative Manual of Ilizarov Techniques, Mosby, St. Louis, MO.