Helicopter Vibration Reduction through Cyclic Variations in Rotor Blade Root Stiffness

Abstract

This study analytically examines the influence of cyclic variations in flap-, lag-, and torsion-stiffness of the blade root region (at harmonics of the rotational speed), for reduction of vibratory hub loads of a helicopter in forward flight. The results indicate that considerable reduction in hub vibrations is possible using small-to-moderate amplitude cyclic variations in stiffness (no greater than 15% of the baseline stiffness value). Torsion stiffness variations produced moderate reductions in vertical hub force, lag stiffness variations produced substantial reductions in all hub forces and the hub yaw moment, and flap stiffness variations produced very significant reductions in all hub forces and the hub roll and pitch moments. The amplitude of the cyclic stiffness variations required generally increase with increasing forward speed, for comparable reductions in vibration. At any given forward speed, if the amplitudes of cyclic stiffness variation are too large, the hub vibrations can actually increase. The stiffness variations that reduce the vibratory hub loads could produce increases in certain vibratory blade root load harmonics. Vibration reductions are achieved due to a decrease in the inertial contribution to the hub loads, or a change in relative phase of various contributions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Reichert, G. , “Helicopter Vibration Control—A Survey,” Vertica, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1981, pp. 1-20.

Lowey, R. G. , “Helicopter Vibrations: A Technological Perspective,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 29, No. 4, Oct. 1984, pp. 4-30.

Friedmann, P. P. , “Helicopter Vibration Reduction Using Structural Optimization with Aeroelastic/Multidisciplinary Constraints—A Survey,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1991, pp. 8-21.

Friedmann, P. P. and Millott, T. A. , “Vibration Reduction in Rotorcraft Using Active Control: A Comparison of Various Approaches,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 18, No. 4, July-August 1995, pp. 664-673.

Hrovat, D. , Barak, P. and Rabins, M. , “Semi-active versus Passive or Active Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Control,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 109, No. 3, March 1983, pp. 691-705.

Yang, J. N. , Wu, J. C. and Li, Z. , “Control of Seismic-Excited Buildings using Active Variable Stiffness Systems,” Engineering Structures, Vol. 19, No. 9, 1996, pp. 589-596.

Patten, W. N. , Mo, C. , Kuehn, J. and Lee, J. , “A Primer on Design of Semiactive Vibration Absorbers (SAVA),” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 124, No. 1, January 1998, pp. 61-68.

Sadek, F. and Mohraz, B. , “Semiactive Control Algorithms for Structures with Variable Dampers,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 124, No. 9, September 1998, pp. 981-990.

Gavin, H. P. and Doke, N. S. , “Resonance Suppression through Variable Stiffness and Damping Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures Conference, SPIE Vol. 3671, March 1999, pp. 43-53.

10.

Krasnicki, E. J. , “Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Results for a Semi-Active Vibration Isolator,” The Shock and Vibration Bulletin, Vol. 50, 1980, The Shock and Vibration Information Center, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington D.C.

11.

Krasnicki, E. J. , “The Experimental Performance of an Off-Road Vehicle Utilizing a Semi-Active Suspension,” The Shock and Vibration Bulletin, 1984, The Shock and Vibration Information Center, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington D.C.

12.

Hrovat, D. , Margolis, D. L. and Hubbard, M. , “An Approach toward the Optimal Semi-Active Suspension,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Vol. 110, September 1988, pp. 288-296.

13.

Karnopp, D. , “Design Principles for Vibration Control using Semi-Active Dampers,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Vol. 112, September 1990, pp. 448-455.

14.

Marathe, S. , Gandhi, F. and Wang, K. W. , “Helicopter Blade Response and Aeromechanical Stability with a Magnetorheological Fluid Based Lag Damper,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Vol 9, No. 4, April 1998, pp. 272-282.

15.

Kamath, G. M. , Wereley, N. M. , and Jolly, M. R. , “Characterization of Magnetorheological Helicopter Lag Dampers,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 44, No. 3, July 1999, pp. 234-248.

16.

Nitzsche, F. , “Smart Spring-Type Actuation for Helicopter Individual Blade Control,” Sixth International Conference on Adaptive Structures, Technomic, Lancaster-Basel, 1996, pp. 230-240.

17.

Nitzsche, F. , “Smart-Spring Actuation for Helicopter Individual Blade Control: A Frequency Domain Analysis,” Seventh International Conference on Adaptive Structures, Technomic, 1997, pp. 331-341.

18.

Bir, G. , Chopra, I. , et al , “University of Maryland Advanced Rotorcraft Code (UMARC) Theory Manual,” UM-AERO Report 92-02, Aug. 1992.