Experimental and Numerical Activities on Damage Detection Using Magnetostrictive Actuators and Statistical Analysis

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to present the formulation of a new experimental procedure to employ in problems of damage analysis of structural elements. The proposed method is based on the acquisition and comparison of Frequency Response Functions (FRFs) of the monitored structure before and after damage occurred. Structural damages modify the dynamic behaviour of the structure and consequently its FRFs making possible calculation of a representative “Damage Index.” The experimental activity was carried on using two prototypes of magnetostrictive actuators developed within the European Commission funded project named MADAVIC (Magnetostrictive Actuators for Damage Analysis and VIbration Control). Three kinds of damages have been simulated on two beam-like structures: little mass disturbances, partial cuts of the beam sections and constraint yielding. Two expressions of damage indices were calculated and analysed. The main target of the work was to assess the reliability of the damage identification by using a “repetitiveness index.” This index is related to the lowest measurable damage extension and the statistical t-test, in order to verify if each calculated index was really representative of a structural damage, rather than of unforeseen differences between the FRFs. A simple Finite Element Model (F.E.M.) of the second test-article has also been developed for numerically simulating the experimental tests and comparing the corresponding results.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Maouk, M. and Zimmerman, D. C. 1994, “Structural damage assessment using a generalised minimum rank perturbation theory,” AIAA Journal, vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 836-842.

2. Stubbs, N. 1990, “Global non destructive damage evaluation in solids,” The International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, pp. 67-79.

3. Thyagarayan, S. K. , Shulz, M. J. , Pai, P. F. and Chung, J. 1998, “Detecting structural damage using frequency response functions,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, N. 210.

4. Contursi, T. , Mangiolardi, L. M. and Messina, A. 1998, “Detection of structural faults by modal data, lower bounds and shadow sites,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, N. 210.

5. Maia, N. M. M. , Silva, J. M. M. and Sampaio, R. P. C. 1997, “Localisation of damage using curvature of the frequency response functions,” Proceedings of the 15th International Modal Analysis Conference, February, Orlando, Florida.

6. Chen, J. Y. , Sharpe, L. Jr. and Jonkowsky, A. L. 1998, “An overview of vibrational-based nondestructive evaluation techniques,” Proceedings of SPIE (Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers), Volume 3397.

7. Fedele, P. , Cafasso, G. and Lecce L. 1996, “A new technique for damage identification and health monitoring of structures using piezoelectric sensors and actuators,” Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Adaptive Structures (ICAST), Roma (Italy).

8. Monaco, E. , Franco, F. and Lecce, L. 1999, “Structural damage identification using magnetostrictive actuators,”

Proceedings of SPIE (Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers) Vth Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials—

Newport Beach (California), 1-3 October, Volume 3668.

9. Monaco, E. and Lecce L. 1999, “Magnetostrictive actuators application in structural damage analysis and active control of vibrations” Proceedings of International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies (ICAST99), Paris 11-13 October.

10.

10. Lecce, L. and Franco, F. 1998, “Results and prospects for the project MADAVIC,” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on New Actuators (ACTUATOR ’98), Bremen (Germany) 17-19th June.