Evaluation of Patient Safety Culture: A Survey of Clinicians in a Cardiovascular Operating Room

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to understand the perceived safety culture and attitudes of caregivers in a large cardiovascular operating room (CVOR) in a mid-Atlantic state where more than 1500 procedures are performed annually to include ventricular assist device placement and heart and lung transplantations.

Methods

We analyzed deidentified data obtained from a safety survey completed anonymously by frontline caregivers in the CVOR via the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire developed by Pasquel Metrics.

Results

The responses from the CVOR clinicians were overall positive for their perceptions of the CVOR safety climate, with the majority saying they would feel safe being treated as a patient, liked their job, and were aware of the proper channels regarding patient safety. However, many made claims of experiencing fatigue and stress due to an excessive workload and participation in emergency situations. Furthermore, the support/clinical perfusion teams were found to have experienced the greatest amount of stress and discomfort, whereas it seems the surgeons were impacted the least.

Conclusions

This study suggests that reactions to different situations in the operating room are dependent on the role of the caregiver. Therefore, interventions to improve communication among the caregivers must be geared on an individual group basis.

Keywords

Patient safety Cardiovascular operating room Caregiver perceptions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aspden

, Corrigan

, Wolcott

, Erickson

Patient safety: achieving a new standard for care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004.

Institute of Medicine Committee on the Quality of Health Care in America. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. 1st ed. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2000.

Wllsworth

., Iverson

R.E.

Patient safety in the operating room. Semin Plast Surg. 2006; 20: 214–218.

Singer

, Meterko

, Baker

, Gaba

, Falwell

, Rosen

Workforce perceptions of hospital safety culture: development and validation of the Patient Safety Climate in Healthcare Organization Survey. Health Serv Res. 2007; 42: 1999–2021.

Pronovost

P.J.

, Weast

, Holzmueller

C.G.

Evaluation of the culture of safety: survey of clinicians and managers in an academic medical center. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12: 405–410.

ElBardissi

A.W.

, Wiegman

D.A.

, Dearani

J.A.

, Daly

R.C.

, Sundt

3rd . Application of the human factors analysis and classification system methodology to the cardiovascular surgery operating room. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83: 1412–1419.

Pasquel Metrics. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Available at: http://www.pascalmetrics.com/about/. Accessed June 29, 2012.

Sexton

J.B.

, Helmreich

R.L.

, Neilands

T.B.

The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; 6: 44.

Makary

M.A.

, Sexton

J.B.

, Freischlang

J.A.

Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 202: 746–752.

10.

Graling

P.R.

Designing an applied model of perioperative patient safety. Clin Scholars Rev. 2011; 4: 104–114.

11.

The Leapfrog Group. Never events factsheet, 2008. Available at: http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/Leapfrog-Never_Events_Fact_Sheet.pdf. Accessed on March 9, 2012.

12.

Schimpff

Improving operating room and perioperative safety: background and specific recommendations. Surg Innov. 2007; 14: 127–135.

13.

Wadhera

R.K.

, Parker

S.H.

, Burkhardt

H.M.

Is the “sterile cockpit” concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 139: 312–319.

14.

Bognar

, Barach

, Johnson

Errors and the burden of errors: attitudes, perceptions and the culture of safety in pediatric cardiac surgical teams. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 85: 1374–1381.

15.

Spiess

B.D.

Human errors in medicine: change in cardiac operating rooms through the FOCUS initiative. JECT. 2011; 43: 33–38.

16.

Gurses

A.P.

, Kim

, Martinez

E.A.

Identifying and categorising patient safety hazards in cardiovascular operating rooms using an interdisciplinary approach: a multisite study [published online ahead of print May 5, 2012]. BMJ Qual Saf. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000625.

17.

France

D.J.

, Leming-Lee

, Jackson

, Feistritzer

N.R.

, Higgins

M.S.

An observational analysis of surgical team compliance with perioperative safety practices after crew resource management training. Am J Surg. 2008; 195: 546–553.

18.

Helmreich

R.L.

, Merritt

A.C.

, Wilhelm

J.A.

The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999; 9: 19–32. University of Texas at Austin Human Factors Research Project: 235.

19.

Zeltser

M.V.

, Nash

Approaching the evidence basis for aviation derived teamwork training in medicine. Am J Med Qual. 2010; 25: 13–23.

20.

Grogan

E.L.

, Stiles

R.A.

, France

D.J.

The impact of aviation based teamwork training on the attitudes of health care professionals. J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 199: 843–848.

21.

Clay-Williams

, Braithwaite

Determination of health care teamwork training competencies—Adelphi study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009; 21: 433–440.

22.

Kozhimannil

, Prielipp

R.C.

Safety in the operating room: team approach saves lives. Semin Thoracic Surg. 2010; 22: 267–268.

23.

Leonard

M.W.

, Frankel

A.S.

Role of effective teamwork and communication in delivering safe, high-quality care. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011; 78: 820–826. doi: 10.1002/msj.20295.