North of England Stable Angina Guideline Development Group.North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management of stable anginaBMJ.1996; 312: 827–832.
3.
HughesG.C., AnnexB.H.Angiogenic therapy for coronary artery and peripheral arterial disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther.2005; 3: 521–535.
ChengD., DiegelerA., AllenK.Transmyocardial laser revascularization: a meta-analysis and systematic review of controlled trials. Innovations2006; 1: 295–313.
6.
ColditzG.A., MillerJ.N., MostellerF.How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy, I: medical. Stat Med.1989; 8: 441–454.
7.
MilzS., ColditzG.A., MostellerF.How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy, II. surgical. Stat Med.1989; 8: 455–466.
8.
MoherD., CookD.J., EastwoodS.Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement: Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet.1999; 354: 1896–1900.
AabergeL., NordstrandK., DragsundM.Transmyocardial revascularization with CO2 laser in patients with refractory angina pectoris: clinical results from the Norwegian randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol.2000; 35: 1170–1177.
11.
AllenK.B., DowlingR.D., FudgeT.L.Comparison of transmyocardial revascularization with medical therapy in patients with refractory angina. N Engl J Med.1999; 341: 1029–1036.
12.
BurkhoffD., SchmidtS., SchulmanS.P.Transmyocardial laser revascularisation compared with continued medical therapy for treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a prospective randomised trial: ATLANTIC Investigators: Angina Treatments-Lasers and Normal Therapies in Comparison. Lancet.1999; 354: 885–890.
13.
FrazierO.H., MarchR.J., HorvathK.A.Transmyocardial revascularization with a carbon dioxide laser in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med.1999; 341: 1021–1028.
14.
SchofieldP.M., SharplesL.D., CaineN.Transmyocardial laser revascularisation in patients with refractory angina: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet.1999; 353: 519–524. Erratum in: Lancet. 1999; 353: 1714.
15.
van der SlootJ.A., HuikeshovenM., TukkieR.Transmyocardial revascularization using an XeCl excimer laser: results of a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg.2004; 78: 875–881; discussion 881–882.
AllenK.B., DowlingR.D., SchuchD.R.Adjunctive transmyocardial revascularization: five-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg.2004; 78: 458–465.
18.
FrazierO.H., TuzunE., EichstadtH.Transmyocardial laser revascularization as an adjunct to coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized, multicenter study with 4-year follow-up. Tex Heart Inst J.2004; 31: 231–239.
19.
LoubaniM., ChinD., LevermentJ.N., GalinanesM.Mid-term results of combined transmyocardial laser revascularization and coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg.2003; 76: 1163–1166.
20.
GuleserianK.J., ManiarH.S., CamilloC.J.Quality of life and survival after transmyocardial laser revascularization with the holmium: YAG laser. Ann Thorac Surg.2003; 75: 1842–1847.
21.
HorvathK.A., FergusonT.B.Jr., GuytonR.A., EdwardsF.H.Impact of unstable angina on outcomes of transmyocardial laser revascularization combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg.2005; 80: 2082–2085.
22.
LutterG., SaraiK., NitzscheE.Evaluation of transmyocardial laser revascularization by following objective parameters of perfusion and ventricular function. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2000; 48: 79–85.
23.
HibbleA., KankaD., PencheonD.Guidelines in general practice: the new Tower of Babel?BMJ.1998; 317: 862–863.
24.
Appraisal of Guidelines RaEiEACG.Guideline development in Europe: an international comparison. Int J Technol Assess Health Care2000; 16: 1039–1049.
25.
SackettD.L.Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest1986; 89(S): 2–3.
26.
AllenK., ChengD., CohnW.Endoscopic Vascular Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2005. Innovations2005; 1: 51–60.
27.
PuskasJ., ChengD., KnightJ.Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis and consensus statement from the 2004 ISMICS Consensus Conference. Innovations.2005; 1: 3–27.
