European studies document that occupational contact dermatitis (CD) is common in hairdressers, but studies from North America are lacking.
Objectives
The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of occupational CD among North American hairdressers/cosmetologists (HD/CS) and to characterize responsible allergens and irritants as well as their sources.
Methods
A cross-sectional analysis of patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group between 1994 and 2010 was conducted.
Results
Of 35,842 patients, 432 (1.2%) were HD/CS. Significantly, most of the HD/CS were female (89.8%) and younger than 40 years (55.6%) as compared with non–hairdressers (P < 0.0001). The rates for allergic and irritant CD in HD/CS were 72.7% and 37.0%, respectively. The most common body site of involvement was the hand, and this was significantly more common than in non-HD/CS (P < 0.0001). The most frequent currently relevant and occupationally related allergens were glyceryl thioglycolate, p-phenylenediamine, nickel sulfate, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, and quaternium-15. Hair dyes, permanent wave solutions, and other hair products were common sources of allergens. The North American Contact Dermatitis Group allergen series missed at least 1 occupationally-related allergen in 26.2% of patients.
Conclusions
Contact dermatitis in North American HD/CS is common, and occupationally related allergens are those found in HD/CS products. Supplemental hairdressing/cosmetology antigen series are important in detecting all occupationally related allergens in this population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bureau of labor statistics. U.S. Department of Labor: 2010 Survey of Occupational Injuries & Illnesses, 2011. Available at: http://www.Bls.Gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/osch0044.Pdf. Accessed February10, 2012.
2.
Centers for Diseasse Control and Prevention: skin exposure and effects. Last updated on august 26, 2010. Available at: http://www.Cdc.Gov/niosh/topics/skin/. Accessed February10, 2012.
3.
WangMZ, FarmerSA, RichardsonDM, et al.Patch-testing with hairdressing chemicals. Dermatitis, 2011; 22: 16–26.
4.
IorizzoM, ParenteG, VincenziC, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis in hairdressers: frequency and source of sensitisation. Eur J Dermatol, 2002; 12: 179–182.
5.
Sanchez-PerezJ, Garcia del RioI, Alvarez RuizS, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis from direct dyes for hair colouration in hairdressers’ clients. Contact Dermatitis, 2004; 50: 261–262.
AthavaleP, ShumKW, ChenY, et al..Occupational dermatitis related to chromium and cobalt: experience of dermatologists (EPIDERM) and occupational physicians (OPRA) in the U.K. Over an 11-year period (1993–2004). Br J Dermatol, 2007; 157: 518–522.
8.
MeyerJD, ChenY, HoltDL, et al.Occupational contact dermatitis in the UK: a surveillance report from EPIDERM and OPRA. Occup Med (Lond), 2000; 50: 265–273.
9.
ValksR, Conde-SalazarL, MalfeitoJ, et al.Contact dermatitis in hairdressers, 10 years later: patch-test results in 300 hairdressers (1994 to 2003) and comparison with previous study. Dermatitis, 2005; 16: 28–31.
BakeMA, VaislaD, SudmalisP.Chemical risk for hairdressers. In: 8th International Symposium of ISSA Research Section; May 19–21, 2003; Athens, Greece.
14.
UterW, LessmannH, GeierJ, et al.Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and clients—an 8-year analysis of IVDK data. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 49: 236–240.
15.
FroschPJ, BurrowsD, CamarasaJG, et al.Allergic reactions to a hairdressers’ series: results from 9 European centres. The European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG). Contact Dermatitis, 1993; 28: 180–183.
16.
UterW, LessmannH, GeierJ, et al.Contact allergy to hairdressing allergens in female hairdressers and clients—current data from the IVDK, 2003–2006. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, 2007; 5: 993–1001.
17.
Conde-SalazarL, BazaM, GuimaraensaD, et al.Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: patch test results in 379 hairdressers (1980–1993). Am J Contact Dermat, 1995; 6: 19–23.
18.
GuerraL, TostiA, BardazziF, et al.Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: the Italian experience. Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali. Contact Dermatitis, 1992; 26: 101–107.
19.
KatsarouA, KoufouB, TakouK, et al.Patch test results in hairdressers with contact dermatitis in Greece (1985–1994). Contact Dermatitis, 1995; 33: 347–348.
20.
van der WalleHB, BrunsveldVM. Dermatitis in hairdressers. (i). The experience of the past 4 years. Contact Dermatitis, 1994; 30: 217–221.
21.
GuoYL, WangBJ, LeeJY, et al.Occupational hand dermatoses of hairdressers in tainan city. Occup Environ Med, 1994; 51: 689–692.
22.
LyndeCW, MitchellJC. Patch test results in 66 hairdressers 1973–81. Contact Dermatitis, 1982; 8: 302–307.
23.
ParkJ, RoY. Occupational skin disease in hairdressers: Results of patch test. Korean J Dermatol, 2006; 44: 669–674.
24.
HolnessDL, NethercottJR. Dermatitis in hairdressers. Dermatol Clin, 1990; 8: 119–126.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. U.S. Department of Labor: employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by age, sex, and race, 2010. Available at: http://www.Bls.Gov/cps/cpsaat3.Pdf. Accessed February10, 2012.
28.
NethercottJR, MacPhersonM, ChoiBC, et al.Contact dermatitis in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis, 1986; 14: 73–79.
ShumKW, MeyerJD, ChenY, et al.Occupational contact dermatitis to nickel: experience of the British dermatologists (EPIDERM) and occupational physicians (OPRA) surveillance schemes. Occup Environ Med, 2003; 60: 954–957.
31.
LindML, AlbinM, BrismanJ, et al.Incidence of hand eczema in female Swedish hairdressers. Occup Environ Med, 2007; 64: 191–195.
32.
LysdalSH, SostedH, AndersenKE, et al.Hand eczema in hairdressers: a Danish register-based study of the prevalence of hand eczema and its career consequences. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 65: 151–158.
33.
HansenHS, SostedH. Hand eczema in Dopenhagen hairdressers— prevalence and under-reporting to occupational registers. Contact Dermatitis, 2009; 61: 361–363.
34.
LazarovA.Sensitization to acrylates is a common adverse reaction to artificial fingernails. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2007; 21: 169–174.
35.
Aalto-KorteK, Henriks-EckermanML, KuulialaO, et al.Occupation al methacrylate and acrylate allergy—cross-reactions and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63: 301–312.
36.
Teik-Jin GoonA, BruzeM, ZimersonE, et al.Contact allergy to acrylates/methacrylates in the acrylate and nail acrylics series in Southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 57: 21–27.
37.
ConstandtL, HeckeEV, NaeyaertJM, et al.Screening for contact allergy to artificial nails. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 52: 73–77.
38.
Gove PBMerriam-Webster Inc. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged: A Merriam Webster. Springfield, Mass: Merriam-Webster; 1993.
39.
DavisMDPW, MichaelZ, YianniasJA, et al.Patch testing with a large series of metal allergens: findings from more than 1,000 patients in one decade at Mayo clinic. Dermatitis, 2011; 22: 256–271.
40.
de GrootAC, CoenraadsPJ. Twenty-five years quaternium-15 in the European baseline series: does it deserve its place there?. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62: 210–220.
41.
de GrootAC, WhiteIR, FlyvholmMA, et al.Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 1. Characterization, frequency and relevance of sensitization, and frequency of use in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62: 2–17.
42.
DavisMD, ScalfLA, YianniasJA, et al.Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a Mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2005. Arch Dermatol, 2008; 144: 67–72.
43.
AlbertMR, ChangY, GonzalezE. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988–1997. Am J Contact Dermat, 1999; 10: 219–223.
44.
WarshawEM, BelsitoDV, DeLeoVA, et al.North American contact dermatitis group patch-test results, 2003–2004 study period. Dermatitis, 2008; 19: 129–136.
45.
WetterDA, DavisMD, YianniasJA, et al.Patch test results from the Mayo clinic contact dermatitis group, 1998–2000. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2005; 53: 416–421.
46.
MarksJG Jr, BelsitoDV, DeLeoVA, et al.North American contact dermatitis group patch-test results, 1996–1998. Arch Dermatol, 2000; 136: 272–273.
47.
MarksJG Jr, BelsitoDV, DeLeoVA, et al.North American contact dermatitis group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermat, 2003; 14: 59–62.
48.
PrattMD, BelsitoDV, DeLeoVA, et al.North American contact dermatitis group patch-test results, 2001–2002 study period. Dermatitis, 2004; 15: 176–183.
AskariSK, WarshawEM. Hair and Scalp Diseases: Medical, Surgical, and Cosmetic Treatments; Basic and Clinical Dermatology; 41. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2008, pp xii, 319 p., [318] p. of plates.
51.
DickelH, KussO, SchmidtA, et al.Importance of irritant contact dermatitis in occupational skin disease. Am J Clin Dermatol, 2002; 3: 283–289.
52.
Anveden BerglindI, AlderlingM, JarvholmB, et al.Occupational skin exposure to water: a population-based study. Br J Dermatol, 2009; 160: 616–621.
53.
TurnerS, CarderM, van TongerenM, et al.The incidence of occupational skin disease as reported to The Health and Occupation Reporting (THOR) network between 2002 and 2005. Br J Dermatol, 2007; 157: 713–722.
