FisherAA.Permanent loss of fingernails from sensitization and reaction to acrylic in a preparation designed to make artificial nails. J Dermatol Surg Oncol, 1980; 6: 70–71.
10.
FisherAA, BaranRL. Adverse reactions to acrylate sculptured nails with particular reference to prolonged paresthesia. Am J Contact Dermatitis, 1991; 2 (1): 38–42.
FisherAA.Cross reactions between methyl methacrylate monomer and acrylic monomers presently used in acrylic nail preparations. Contact Dermatitis, 1980; 6 (5): 345–347.
13.
KanervaL, LauermaA, EstlanderT, et al..Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by photobonded sculptured nails and a review of (meth)acrylates in nail cosmetics. Am J Contact Dermatitis, 1996; 7 (2): 109–115.
14.
FriesJB, FisherAA, SalvatiEA. Contact dermatitis in surgeons from methyl methacrylate bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1975; 57 (4): 547–549.
15.
AndersenSL, RastogiSC, AndersenKE. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) in a manicurist. Contact Dermatitis, 2009; 61 (1): 48–50.
16.
KanervaL, EstlanderT, JolankiR. Occupational skin allergy in the dental profession. Dermatol Clin, 1994; 12 (3): 517–532.
17.
NethercottJR.Skin problems associated with multifunctional acrylic monomers in ultraviolet curing inks. Br J Dermatol, 1978; 98 (5): 541–552.
18.
IsaacM, ThiboutotDM, VasilyDB, et al..Contact dermatitis from printing inks. Am J Contact Dermatitis, 1992; 3 (3): 142–144.
RanchoffRE, TaylorJS. Contact dermatitis to anaerobic sealants. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1985; 13 (6): 1015–1020.
21.
SoodA, TaylorJS. Allergic contact dermatitis from hearing aid materials. Dermatitis, 2004; 15 (1): 48–49.
22.
JelenG.Acrylate, a hidden allergen of electrocardiogram electrodes. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 45 (5): 315–316.
23.
MarrenP, De BerkerD, PowellS. Methacrylate sensitivity and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Contact Dermatitis, 1991; 25 (3): 190–191.
24.
JagtmanB.Contact dermatitis from acrylates in an electrosurgical earthing plate. Contact Dermatitis, 1998; 38 (5): 280–281.
25.
Van den HoveJ, JacobsMC, TennstedtD, et al..Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylates in insulin pump infusion sets. Contact Dermatitis, 1996; 35 (2): 108.
26.
WaegemaekersTHJM, SeutterE, Den ArendJACJ, et al..Permeability of surgeons’ gloves to methyl methacrylate. Acta Orthop Scand, 1983; 54 (6): 790–795.
27.
MäkeläEA, JolankiR. Chemical permeation through disposable gloves. In: Boman E, Estlander T, Wahlberg JE, et al., eds. Protective Gloves for Occupational Use. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2005: 279–314.
28.
KanervaL, EstlanderT, JolankiR. Sensitization to patch test acrylates. Contact Dermatitis, 1988; 18 (1): 10–15.
ConstandtL, HeckeEV, NaevaertJM, et al..Screening for contact allergy to artificial nails. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 52: 73–77.
31.
KoppulaS, FellmanJ, StorrsF. Screening allergens for acrylate dermatitis associated with artificial nails. Am J Contact Dermatitis, 1995; 6: 78–85.
32.
GoonAT, BruzeM, ZimersonE, et al..Screening for acrylate/methacrylate allergy in the baseline series: our experience in Sweden and Singapore. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 59 (5): 307–313.
33.
DruckerAM, PrattMD. Acrylate contact allergy: patient characteristics and evaluation of screening allergens. Dermatitis, 2011; 22 (2): 98–101.
34.
Henriks-EckermanML, KanervaL. Product analysis of acrylic resins compared to information given in material safety data sheets. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 36 (3): 164–165.
35.
Henriks-EckermanML, KanervaL. Gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric purity analysis of acrylates and methacrylates used as patch test substances. Am J Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 8 (1): 20–23.
GoonAT, BruzeM, ZimersonE, et al..Variation in allergen content over time of acrylates/methacrylates in patch test preparations. Br J Dermatol, 2011; 164 (1): 116–124.