Hairdresser apprentices (HAs) are at high risk of developing occupational contact dermatitis.
Objectives
To assess skin characteristics of HAs, using genotyping, clinically observed and self-reported skin symptoms, and skin bioengineering methods at the beginning of apprenticeship.
Methods
During the screening phase of a prospective cohort study, we recruited 352 HAs in 24 Croatian towns. The protocol included the following: questionnaires with self-reported skin and atopy symptoms evaluation, Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI) for clinical skin assessment, genotyping FLG (filaggrin) gene mutations, skin pH, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements.
Results
Self-reported skin symptoms were reported by 12%, history of dry hands by 29%, and history of atopy by 46% of HAs. Skin changes were found at the clinical examination in 18% of the HA. The OHSI score was positively correlated with hand TEWL and hand skin pH in multiple regression linear models. An FLG gene mutation was found in 1 apprentice.
Conclusions
Significant prevalence of clinically observed skin signs on the hands was observed in HAs at the beginning of training. The OHSI score was found to be an independent predictor of higher hand TEWL and skin pH values. The need to ameliorate preventive examinations before the enrolment to hairdressing schools was indicated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarøeTK, EbbehøjNE, AgnerT. Occupational dermatitis in hairdressers—influence of individual and environmental factors. Contact Dermatitis, 2017; 76:146–150.
2.
HougaardMG, WintherL, SøstedH, et al.Occupational skin diseases in hairdressing apprentices—has anything changed?. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 72:40–46.
3.
LyonsG, RobertsH, PalmerA, et al.Hairdressers presenting to an occupational dermatology clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Contact Dermatitis, 2013; 68:300–306.
4.
JakasaI, ThyssenJP, KezicS. The role of skin barrier in occupational contact dermatitis. Exp Dermatol, 2018; 27:909–914.
JohnSM, UterW, SchwanitzHJ. Relevance of multiparametric skin bioengineering in a prospectively-followed cohort of junior hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis, 2000; 43:161–168.
12.
BregnhøjA, SøstedH, MennéT, et al.Exposures and reactions to allergens among hairdressing apprentices and matched controls. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 64:85–89.
13.
Golińska-ZachA, Krawczyk-SzulcP, WiszniewskaM, et al.Sensitization to occupational allergens in hairdressing apprentices diagnosed already before entering vocational training. Med Pr, 2016; 67:567–575.
14.
Sabolić PipinićI, VarnaiVM, TurkR, et al.Low frequency of filaggrin null mutations in Croatia and their relation with allergic diseases. Int J Immunogenet, 2013; 40:192–198.
15.
SamardžicT, VarnaiVM, BakoticM, et al.Skin health and safety at work in Croatian hairdressing apprentices. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 75:25–31.
16.
SusitaivalP, FlyvholmMA, MedingB, et al.Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002): a new tool for surveying occupational skin diseases and exposure. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 49:70–76.
17.
AsherMI, KeilU, AndersonHR, et al.International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods. Eur Respir J, 1995; 8:483–491.
18.
de JonghCM, KhrenovaL, VerberkMM, et al.Loss-of-function polymorphisms in the filaggrin gene are associated with an increased susceptibility to chronic irritant contact dermatitis: a case-control study. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 159:621–627.
19.
PalmerCN, IrvineAD, Terron-KwiatkowskiA, et al.Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nat Genet, 2006; 38:441–446.
20.
SandilandsA, Terron-KwiatkowskiA, HullPR, et al.Comprehensive analysis of the gene encoding filaggrin uncovers prevalent and rare mutations in ichthyosis vulgaris and atopic eczema. Nat Genet, 2007; 39:650–654.
21.
SkudlikC, DulonM, PohrtU, et al.Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index—a study of the interobserver reliability of a scoring system assessing skin diseases of the hands. Contact Dermatitis, 2006; 55:42–47.
22.
DulonM, SkudlikC, NüblingM, et al.Validity and responsiveness of the Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI): a methodological study. Br J Dermatol, 2009; 160:137–142.
23.
StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2009.
UterW, GefellerO, SchwanitzHJ. An epidemiological study of the influence of season (cold and dry air) on the occurrence of irritant skin changes of the hands. Br J Dermatol, 1998; 138:266–272.
26.
Jurakic ToncicR, KezicS, JakasaI, et al.Filaggrin loss-of-function mutations and levels of filaggrin degradation products in adult patients with atopic dermatitis in Croatia [published online January 27, 2020]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2020; 34:1789–1794.
27.
WangX, YeL, LaiQ, et al.Altered epidermal permeability barrier function in the uninvolved skin supports a role of epidermal dysfunction in the pathogenesis of occupational hand eczema. Skin Pharmacol Physiol, 2020; 33(2):94–101.
28.
SmitHA, van RijssenA, VandenbrouckeJP, et al.Susceptibility to and incidence of hand dermatitis in a cohort of apprentice hairdressers and nurses. Scand J Work Environ Health, 1994; 20(2):113–121.
29.
SadhraSS, KurmiOP, MohammedNI, et al.Protection afforded by controlled application of a barrier cream: a study in a workplace setting. Br J Dermatol, 2014; 171(4):813–818.
30.
van RensburgSJ, FrankenA, Du PlessisJL. Measurement of transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration and skin surface ph in occupational settings: a review. Skin Res Technol.
31.
KimE, KimS, NamGW, et al.The alkaline pH-adapted skin barrier is disrupted severely by SLS-induced irritation. Int J Cosmet Sci, 2009; 31(4):263–269.
32.
Lipińska-OjrzanowskaA, Walusiak-SkorupaJ, Nowakowska-ŚwirtaE, et al.Predicting occupational allergy in culinary and hairdressing apprentices. Occup Med (Lond), 2020; 70:68–71.
33.
RobertsH, FrowenK, SimM, et al.Prevalence of atopy in a population of hairdressing students and practising hairdressers in Melbourne, Australia. Australas J Dermatol, 2006; 47:172–177.
34.
MunivranaH, Vorko-JovicA, MunivranaS, et al.The prevalence of allergic diseases among Croatian school children according to the ISAAC Phase One questionnaire. Med Sci Monit, 2007; 13:505–509.
35.
Stipić-MarkovićA, PevecB, PevecMR, et al.Prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis and atopic eczema: ISAAC (International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood) in a population of schoolchildren in Zagreb. Acta Med Croatica, 2003; 57:281–285.
36.
BanacS, RozmanicV, ManestarK, et al.Rising trends in the prevalence of asthma and allergic diseases among school children in the north-west coastal part of Croatia. J Asthma, 2013; 50:810–814.
37.
AberleN, Kljaic BukvicB, BlekicM, et al.Allergic diseases and atopy among schoolchildren in Eastern Croatia. Acta Clin Croat, 2018; 57:82–90.
38.
ChuL, RennieD, CockcroftD, et al.Agreement between questionnaire report of allergy-related outcomes in school-age children and objective measures of atopy : the Saskatchewan rural health study. Experimental Allergy, 2015; 45:1337–1345.
39.
MacanJ, VarnaiVM, MalocaI, et al.Increasing trend in atopy markers prevalence in a Croatian adult population between 1985 and 1999. Clin Exp Allergy, 2007; 37:1756–1763.
