Allergic contact dermatitis to tattoo ink may last from weeks to years. Formaldehyde is a strong sensitizer that may be present in predispersed tattoo inks.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of formaldehyde in predispersed tattoo inks using the chromotropic acid method.
Methods
Tattoo inks from 39 companies were evaluated. Inclusion criteria included availability to purchase inks online through US tattoo product wholesalers or individual Web sites. Brands were grouped based on prevalence of use: common, uncommon, or rare. For common brands, 8 colors (primary colors, secondary colors, black, and white) were purchased. For uncommon and rare brands, 5 colors (primary colors, black, and white) were purchased. Each ink was tested with standard chromotropic acid method procedures; concentration of formaldehyde released was quantified using spectrophotometry.
Results
In total, 127 tattoo inks were purchased and tested. Ninety-three (73%) tested positive for formaldehyde release; 34 (27%) tested negative. Formaldehyde release did not correlate with color or brand. At least 1 ink from all brands (except 1) was positive for formaldehyde release.
Conclusion
Approximately three-quarters of selected US tattoo inks tested positive for formaldehyde release. Clinicians should be aware of tattoo ink as a potential source of formaldehyde.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EngelE, SantarelliF, VasoldR, et al.Modern tattoos cause high concentrations of hazardous pigments in skin. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 58(4):228–233.
SerupJ, Hutton CarlsenK, SepehriM. Tattoo complaints and complications: diagnosis and clinical spectrum. Curr Probl Dermatol, 2015; 48:48–60.
8.
ForbatE, Al-NiaimiF. Patterns of reactions to red pigment tattoo and treatment methods. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb), 2016; 6(1):13–23.
9.
LiszewskiW, WarshawEM. Pigments in American tattoo inks and their propensity to elicit allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2019; 81(2):379–385.
10.
WarshawEM, SchlarbaumJP, TaylorJS, et al.Allergic reactions to tattoos: retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001–2016. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2020; 82(2):e61–e62.
11.
LauxP, TralauT, TentschertJ, et al.A medical-toxicological view of tattooing. Lancet, 2016; 387(10016):395–402.
12.
SchubertS.Patch test panel for epidemiological surveillance of tattoo allergens in tattoo products. Paper presented at: 4th European Congress on Tattoo and Pigment Research; Bern, Switzerland; 2019:66.
13.
HaukssonI, PonténA, IsakssonM, et al.Formaldehyde in cosmetics in patch tested dermatitis patients with and without contact allergy to formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 74(3):145–151.
14.
Aalto-KorteK, KuulialaO, SuuronenK, et al.Occupational contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 59(5):280–289.
15.
HauriU. Pigments, Preservatives and Impurities in Tattoo Ink. 2014:1–14.
16.
HaukssonI, PonténA, GruvbergerB, et al.Skincare products containing low concentrations of formaldehyde detected by the chromotropic acid method cannot be safely used in formaldehyde-allergic patients. Br J Dermatol, 2016; 174(2):371–379.
17.
LimH-H, ShinH-S. Sensitive determination of volatile organic compounds and aldehydes in tattoo inks. J Chromatogr Sci, 2017; 55(2):109–116.
18.
FlyvholmMA, HallBM, AgnerT, et al.Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing formaldehyde releaser. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 36(1):26–33.
19.
SerupJ, KatrinaHC. Patch test study of 90 patients with tattoo reactions: negative outcome of allergy patch test to baseline batteries and culprit inks suggests allergen(s) are generated in the skin through haptenization. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 71(5):255–263.
20.
FregertS, DahlquistI, GruvbergerB. A simple method for the detection of formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis, 1984; 10(3):132–134.
21.
NikleAB, LiouYL, EricsonME, et al.Formaldehyde release from clothing and upholstery fabrics using the chromotropic acid method. Dermatitis, 2019; 30(4):255–258.
22.
LiouYL, EricsonME, WarshawEM. Formaldehyde release from baby wipes: analysis using the chromotropic acid method. Dermatitis, 2019; 30(3):207–212.
23.
BrickerCF, JohnsonHR. Spectrophotometric method for determining formaldehyde. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed, 1945; 17(6):400–402.
24.
FlyvholmMA, TiedemannE, MennéT. Comparison of 2 tests for clinical assessment of formaldehyde exposure. Contact Dermatitis, 1996; 34(1):35–38.
25.
SawickiE, HauserTR, McPhersonS. Spectrophotometric determination of formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing compounds with chromotropic acid, 6-amino-1-naphthol-3-sulfonic acid (J acid), and 6-anilino-1-naphthol-3-sulfonic acid (phenyl J acid). Anal Chem, 1962; 34(11):1460–1464.
26.
NikleA, EricsonM, WarshawE. Formaldehyde release from US personal care products: chromotropic acid method analysis. Dermatitis, 2019; 30(1):67–73.
27.
HamJE, SiegelP, MaibachH. Undeclared formaldehyde levels in patient consumer products: formaldehyde test kit utility. Cutan Ocul Toxicol, 2019; 38(2):112–117.
28.
RosenbaumBE, MilamEC, SeoL, et al.Skin care in the tattoo parlor: a survey of tattoo artists in New York City. Dermatology, 2016; 232(4):484–489.
29.
HondaT, EgawaG, GrabbeS, et al.Update of immune events in the murine contact hypersensitivity model: toward the understanding of allergic contact dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol, 2013; 133(2):303–315.
30.
SilvestreMC, dos ReisVMS, SatoMN. Innate immunity and effector and regulatory mechanisms involved in allergic contact dermatitis. An Bras Dermatol, 2018; 93(2):242–250.
31.
SperryK. Tattoos and tattooing II: gross pathology, histopathology, medical complications, and applications. Am J Forensic Med Pathol, 1992; 13(1):7–17.
32.
BendsoeN, HanssonC, SternerO. Inflammatory reactions from organic pigments in red tattoos. Acta Derm Venereol, 1991; 71:70–73.
33.
BilW, van der BentSAS, SpiekstraSW, et al.Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin-18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model. Contact Dermatitis, 2018; 79(6):336–345.
