Ingredients in nail care products may lead to allergic and/or irritant contact dermatitis.
Objective
The aims of this study were to determine frequency of contact dermatitis associated with nail care products, characterize associated body sites, and describe causative allergens.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group data between 2001 and 2016.
Results
Of the 38,775 patients tested, 769 (2.0%) had: 1) more than 1 allergic patch test reaction associated with a nail care product (n = 746), 2) irritant contact dermatitis associated with a nail care product (n = 14), or 3) both (n = 9). Primary body sites included the face (43.0%) and hands (27.6%). The top 5 allergens were (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (273/482, 56.6%), methyl methacrylate (210/755, 27.8%), ethyl acrylate (190/755, 25.2%), ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate (12/175, 6.9%) and tosylamide (273/755, 36.2%). Frequency of allergy to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (P = 0.0069) and ethyl acrylate (P = 0.0024) significantly increased over the study period, whereas allergy secondary to tosylamide significantly decreased (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions
As long-lasting nail techniques become widespread, the prevalence of contact dermatitis to nail care products is expected to increase. Almost one-fifth of nail care product–associated allergens would have been missed without additional screening allergens beyond the North American Contact Dermatitis Group series, underscoring the need for testing to a broad array of allergens.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JeffersonJ, RichP. Update on nail cosmetics. Dermatol Ther, 2012; 25(6):481–490.
2.
ChouM, DhingraN, StrugarTL. Contact sensitization to allergens in nail cosmetics. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(4):231–240.
HareAQ, RichP. Nail cosmetics: benefits and pitfalls. In: RubinAI, JellinekNJ, Daniel CRIII, et al, eds. Scher and Daniel's Nails. 4th ed. vol. 669. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018.
5.
OrtonDI, WilkinsonJD. Cosmetic allergy: incidence, diagnosis, and management. Am J Clin Dermatol, 2004; 5(5):327–337.
6.
ÖzkayaE, EkinciA. Metal contact sites: a hidden localization for nail varnish allergy?. Clin Exp Dermatol, 2010; 35(4):e137–e140.
7.
LazzariniR, DuarteI, de FariasDC, et al.Frequency and main sites of allergic contact dermatitis caused by nail varnish. Dermatitis, 2008; 19(6):319–322.
8.
TostiA, GuerraL, VincenziC, et al.Contact sensitization caused by toluene sulfonamide-formaldehyde resin in women who use nail cosmetics. Am J Contact Dermat, 1993; 4(3):150–153.
9.
LeeS, MaorD, PalmerA, et al.Declining prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis caused by toslyamide/formaldehyde in nail polish. Contact Dermatitis, 2018; 79(3):184–185.
10.
LeQ, CahillJ, Palmer-LeA, et al.The rising trend in allergic contact dermatitis to acrylic nail products. Australas J Dermatol, 2015; 56(3):221–223.
11.
Gatica-OrtegaME, Pastor-NietoMA, Mercader-GarcíaP, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis caused by (meth)acrylates in long-lasting nail polish—are we facing a new epidemic in the beauty industry?. Contact Dermatitis, 2017; 77(6):360–366.
12.
RaposoI, LoboI, AmaroC, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis caused by (meth)acrylates in nail cosmetic products in users and nail technicians—a 5-year study. Contact Dermatitis, 2017; 77(6):356–359.
13.
MuttardiK, WhiteIR, BanerjeeP. The burden of allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 75(3):180–184.
14.
FischA, HamneriusN, IsakssonM. Dermatitis and occupational (meth)acrylate contact allergy in nail technicians—a 10-year study. Contact Dermatitis, 2019; 81(1):58–60.
15.
MontgomeryR, StocksSJ, WilkinsonSM. Contact allergy resulting from the use of acrylate nails is increasing in both users and those who are occupationally exposed. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 74(2):120–122.
16.
Gatica-OrtegaME, Pastor-NietoMA, Gil-RedondoR, et al.Non-occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by long-lasting nail polish kits for home use: ‘the tip of the iceberg’. Contact Dermatitis, 2018; 78(4):261–265.
17.
GonçaloM, PinhoA, AgnerT, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis caused by nail acrylates in Europe. An EECDRG study. Contact Dermatitis, 2018; 78(4):254–260.
18.
SainioEL, EngströmK, Henriks-EckermanML, et al.Allergenic ingredients in nail polishes. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 37(4):155–162.
DeKovenJG, WarshawEM, BelsitoDV, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results 2013–2014. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(1):33–46.
21.
1980 Census of Population: Classified Index of Industries and Occupations. PHC80-R4 (final edition). Washington, DC: US Dept of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; 1982.
de GrootAC. Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredients. Contact Dermatitis, 1987; 17(1):26–34.
24.
LazarovA. Sensitization to acrylates is a common adverse reaction to artificial fingernails. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2007; 21(2):169–174.
25.
HaughtonAM, BelsitoDV. Acrylate allergy induced by acrylic nails resulting in prosthesis failure. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2008; 59(5):S123–S124.
26.
MilitelloG. Contact and primary irritant dermatitis of the nail unit diagnosis and treatment. Dermatol Ther, 2007; 20(1):47–53.
27.
BaranR. Nail cosmetics: allergies and irritations. Am J Clin Dermatol, 2002; 3(8):547–555.
28.
WarshawEM, WangMZ, MathiasCG, et al.Occupational contact dermatitis in hairdressers/cosmetologists. Dermatitis, 2012; 23(6):258–268.
29.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Nail technicians' health and workplace exposure control. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/manicure/default.html. Published 2018. Accessed November27, 2019.
SpencerA, GazzaniP, ThompsonDA. Acrylate and methacrylate contact allergy and allergic contact disease: a 13-year review. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 75(3):157–164.
32.
RocheE, de la CuadraJ, AlegreV. Sensitization to acrylates caused by artificial acrylic nails: review of 15 cases. Actas Dermosifiliogr, 2008; 99(10):788–794.
33.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Controlling chemical hazards during the application of artificial fingernails. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/99-112/. Published 2018. Accessed November27, 2019.
34.
The Cosmetic Toiletry & Perfumery Association (CTPA). CTPA guideline on artificially enhanced nails and Minimising the risk of allergy. 2019;11.
35.
SassevilleD. Acrylates in contact dermatitis. Dermatitis, 2012; 23(1):6–16.
36.
Aalto-KorteK, AlankoK, KuulialaO, et al.Methacrylate and acrylate allergy in dental personnel. Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 57(5):324–330.
37.
LidenC, BergM, FarmG, et al.Nail varnish allergy with far-reaching consequences. Br J Dermatol, 1993; 128(1):57–62.
38.
NakamuraR, VerdeRBV. Cosmetic approach for healthy and damaged nails. In: IssaMCA, TamuraB, eds. Daily Routine in Cosmetic Dermatology. Niterói, RJ, Brazil: Springer International Publishing; 2016:449–460.
39.
AtwaterAR, ReederM. Trends in nail services may cause dermatitis: not your mother's nail polish. Cutis, 2019; 103(6):315–317.
40.
RollsS, ChowdhuryMM, CooperS, et al.Recommendation to include hydroxyethyl (meth)acrylate in the British baseline patch test series. Br J Dermatol, 2019; 181(4):811–817.
41.
DeKovenS, DeKovenJ, HolnessDL. (Meth)acrylate occupational contact dermatitis in Nail salon workers: a case series. J Cutan Med Surg, 2017; 21(4):340–344.
DruckerAM, PrattMD. Acrylate contact allergy: patient characteristics and evaluation of screening allergens. Dermatitis, 2011; 22(2):98–101.
44.
RamosL, CabralR, GonçaloM. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates and methacrylates—a 7-year study. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 71(2):102–107.
45.
DahlinJ, BerneB, DunérK, et al.Several cases of undesirable effects caused by methacrylate ultraviolet-curing nail polish for non-professional use. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 75(3):151–156.
46.
WarshawEM, BuchholzHJ, BelsitoDV, et al.Allergic patch test reactions associated with cosmetics: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001–2004. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2009; 60(1):23–38.
47.
QuachT, GunierR, TranA, et al.Characterizing workplace exposures in Vietnamese women working in California nail salons. Am J Public Health, 2011; 101(S1):S271–S276.
48.
AlavesVM, SleethDK, ThieseMS, et al.Characterization of indoor air contaminants in a randomly selected set of commercial nail salons in Salt Lake County, Utah, USA. Int J Environ Health Res, 2013; 23(5):419–433.
UterW, GeierJ. Contact allergy to acrylates and methacrylates in consumers and nail artists—data of the information network of departments of dermatology, 2004–2013. Contact Dermatitis, 2015; 72(4):224–228.
51.
ConstandtL, HeckeEV, NaeyaertJM, et al.Screening for contact allergy to artificial nails. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 52(2):73–77.
52.
NakagawaM, HanadaM, AmanoH. Occupational contact dermatitis in a manicurist. J Dermatol, 2019; 46(11):1039–1041.
NassifAS, Le CozCJ, Collet É. A rare nail polish allergen: phthalic anhydride, trimellitic anhydride and glycols copolymer. Contact Dermatitis, 2007 Mar;56(3):172–3.
56.
CastelainM, VeyratS, LaineG, et al.Contact dermatitis from nitrocellulose in a nail varnish. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 36(5):266–267.
57.
GachJE, StoneNM, FinchTM. A series of four cases of allergic contact dermatitis to phthalic anhydride/trimellitic anhydride/glycols copolymer in nail varnish. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 53(1):63–64.
