AlikhanA, ChengLS, AleI, et al.Revised minimal baseline series of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group: evidence-based approach. Dermatitis, 2011; 22:121–122.
2.
BruzeM, Condé-SalazarL, GoossensA, et al.Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 1999; 41:241–250.
3.
IsakssonM, AleI, AndersenKE, et al.Patch testing to a textile dye mix by the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Dermatitis, 2015; 26:170–176.
4.
IsakssonM, AleI, AndersenK, et alInternational Contact Dermatitis ResearchGroup. Multicenter patch testing with a resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Dermatitis, 2015; 26:230–234.
5.
IsakssonM, AleI, AndersenKE, et al.Multicenter patch testing with methylisothiazolinone and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Dermatitis, 2017; 28:210–214.
6.
IsakssonM, AleI, AndersenKE, et al.Patch testing with formaldehyde 2.0% (0.60 mg/cm2) detects substantially more contact allergy to formaldehyde than 1.0%. Dermatitis, 2019; 30:342–346.
7.
EngfeldtM, IsakssonM, GlasB, et al.Patch testing with a new composition of the mercapto mix—a multicentre study by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019; 99:960–963.
8.
IsakssonM, BruzeM, DahlinJ. Patch testing with two textile dye mixes without Disperse Orange 3—which one should be used?. Contact Dermatitis, 2018; 79(S1):91–92.
9.
DahlinJ. Patch testing with a textile dye mix with and without Disperse Orange 3. Contact Dermatitis, 2018; 79(S1):35.
