Both surgical personnel and patients undergoing procedures are exposed regularly to different antiseptic chemicals in various forms. Little is known about the ingredients in these antiseptics and the risk these products may provoke allergic contact dermatitis.
Objective
The aim of the study was to identify and characterize common allergens in surgical scrubs and patient surgical cleansers that health care workers and surgical patients may encounter in the perioperative period.
Methods
DailyMed website was searched using numerous terms for surgical disinfectants. Products used for health care worker handwashing/scrubbing or patient surgical cleansing/disinfecting were included. Each product's ingredients were recorded; those found on the 2017 American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) Core Allergen Series were noted from each product.
Conclusions
A total of 1940 products were identified, of which 267 were included in the analysis. A total of 66.3% contained iodine, 25.8% contained chlorhexidine digluconate, and 2.6% contained chloroxylenol. Within the group analyzed, 1586 ingredients were identified. Of these, 241 were ACDS Core Series allergens. Most products contained a single ACDS allergen. There were significant differences in allergens based on product type and active ingredient, with iodine-containing products having the fewest number of allergens. The most common ACDS allergens found were cocamide diethanolamide (22.5%), fragrance (21.7%), lanolin (19.5%), propylene glycol (6.7%), alkyl glucosides (6.0%), and sorbic acid derivatives (5.6%).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KadarN. Rediscovering Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis (1818–1865). Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019; 220(1):26–39.
WarshawEM, SchramSE, MaibachHI, et al.Occupation-related contact dermatitis in North American health care workers referred for patch testing: cross-sectional data, 1998 to 2004. Dermatitis, 2008; 19(5):261–274.
4.
GuptaSB, GuptaA, ShahB, et al.Hand eczema in nurses, nursing auxiliaries and cleaners—a cross-sectional study from a tertiary hospital in western India. Contact Dermatitis, 2018; 79(1):20–25.
5.
KadivarS, BelsitoDV. Occupational dermatitis in health care workers evaluated for suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis, 2015; 26(4):177–183.
6.
SmedleyJ, WilliamsS, PeelP, et al.Management of occupational dermatitis in healthcare workers: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med, 2012; 69(4):276–279.
7.
CookKA, KelsoJM. Surgery-related contact dermatitis: a review of potential irritants and allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2017; 5(5):1234–1240.
8.
RobertsDL, SummerlyR, ByrneJP. Contact dermatitis due to the constituents of Hibiscrub. Contact Dermatitis, 1981; 7(6):326–328.
9.
GetteMT, MarksJGJr., MaloneyME. Frequency of postoperative allergic contact dermatitis to topical antibiotics. Arch Dermatol, 1992; 128(3):365–367.
10.
de Waard-van der SpekFB, DevillersAC, OranjeAP. Allergic contact dermatitis to sorbitan sesquioleate in Adaptic ® wound dressing. Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 57(1):54–56.
11.
BorregoL, HernándezN, HernándezZ, et al.Povidone-iodine induced post-surgical irritant contact dermatitis localized outside of the surgical incision area. Report of 27 cases and a literature review. Int J Dermatol, 2016; 55(5):540–545.
12.
MarksJG, RaineyMA. Cutaneous reactions to surgical preparations and dressings. Contact Dermatitis, 1984; 10(1):1–5.
13.
CarletC, CastelainF, PelletierF, et al.Post-operative purpuric contact dermatitis: think about antiseptics. Contact Dermatitis, 2019. doi: 10.1111/cod.13277.
14.
SchlarbaumJP, LiouYL, KimyonRS, et al.Oh my glucosides! Occult sources in medical products. Dermatitis, 2019; 30(3):228–230.
15.
SchalockPC, BrodB, WarshawE, et al.American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergen Series. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(2):141–143.
RouhaniP, KirsnerRS, AmadoA, et al.Knowledge of surgery-related allergic contact dermatitis among Florida dermatological surgeons: a pilot study. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 2009; 2(11):33–36.
18.
ButlerL, MowadC. Allergic contact dermatitis in dermatologic surgery: review of common allergens. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(5):215–221.
19.
SilvestriDL, McEnery-StonelakeM. Chlorhexidine: uses and adverse reactions. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(3):112–118.
20.
DeKovenJG, WarshawEM, ZugKA, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2015–2016. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(6):297–309.
21.
HasanT, RantanenT, AlankoK, et al.Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995–1997 and 2000–2002 in Finland—a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 53(1):40–45.
22.
GoonAT, WhiteIR, RycroftRJ, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis from chlorhexidine. Dermatitis, 2004; 15(1):45–47.
23.
SpeightEL, BeckMH, LawrenceCM. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to 3-dimethylaminopropylamine. Contact Dermatitis, 1993; 28(1):49–50.
24.
Aalto-KorteK, PesonenM, KuulialaO, et al.Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by coconut fatty acids diethanolamide. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 70(3):169–174.
25.
WarshawEM, GoodierMC, DeKovenJG, et al.Contact dermatitis associated with skin cleansers. Dermatitis, 2017; 29(1):32–42.
26.
BadaouiA, AmslerE, Raison-PeyronN, et al.An outbreak of contact allergy to cocamide diethanolamide?. Contact Dermatitis, 2015; 72(6):407–409.
27.
BuckleyDA, RycroftRJ, WhiteIR, et al.Fragrance as an occupational allergen. Occup Med (Lond), 2002; 52(1):13–16.
28.
FettigJ, TaylorJ, SoodA. Post-surgical allergic contact dermatitis to compound tincture of benzoin and association with reactions to fragrances and essential oils. Dermatitis, 2014; 25(4):211–212.
29.
PinheiroV, PestanaC, PinhoA, et al.Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by antibiotics in healthcare workers—relationship with non-immediate drug eruptions. Contact Dermatitis, 2018; 78(4):281–286.
30.
MiestR, YianniasJ, ChangY, et al.Diagnosis and prevalence of lanolin allergy. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(3):119–123.
31.
WarshawEM, NelsenDD, MaibachHI, et al.Positive patch test reactions to lanolin: cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994 to 2006. Dermatitis, 2009; 20(2):79–88.
32.
AlaviA, SibbaldRG, LadizinskiB, et al.Wound-related allergic/irritant contact dermatitis. Adv Ski Wound Care, 2016; 29(6):278–286.
33.
WarshawEM, BottoN, MaibachH, et al.Positive patch-test reactions to propylene glycol: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1996 to 2006. Dermatitis, 2009; 20(1):10–20.
34.
LessmannH, SchnuchA, GeierJ, et al.Skin-sensitizing and irritant properties of propylene glycol: data analysis of a multicentre surveillance network (IVDK) and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 53(5):247–259.
35.
LorangerC, AlfalahM, Ferrier Le BouedecMC, et al.Alkyl glucosides in contact dermatitis. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(1):5–13.
Le CozCJ, MeyerMT. Contact allergy to decyl glucoside in antiseptic after body piercing. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 48(5):279–280.
38.
JaqueA, DeKovenJG. Polyhexamethylene biguanide and alkyl glucosides: unexpected allergens in an antimicrobial foam dressing. Contact Dermatitis, 2017; 77(6):421–422.
39.
TostiA, GuerraL, MorelliR, et al.Prevalence and sources of sensitization to emulsifiers: a clinical study. Contact Dermatitis, 1990; 23(2):68–72.
40.
MuradA, MarrenP. Prevalence of methylchloroisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone contact allergy in facial dermatitis: a single centre Irish study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2016; 30(1):60–62.
41.
SchemanA, SeversonD. American Contact Dermatitis Society Contact Allergy Management Program: an epidemiologic tool to quantify ingredient usage. Dermatitis, 2016; 27(1):11–13.
