Health care workers may be at risk of occupational allergic contact dermatitis because of their frequent exposure to medical hand skin cleansers. We identified American Contact Dermatitis Society Core 80 Allergens found in medical hand skin cleansers (waterless skin soaps, water-needed skin soaps, and skin disinfectants) in the United States and developed a list of “low-allergen” medical hand skin cleansers. Waterless skin soaps most commonly contained fragrance, tocopherol, and sodium benzoate. Top allergens in water-needed skin soaps included fragrance, chloroxylenol, propylene glycol, and cocamidopropyl betaine. The most common allergens identified in skin disinfectants were chlorhexidine, cocamide diethanolamine, and fragrance. We identified 11 waterless skin soaps that were free of American Contact Dermatitis Society Core 80 Allergens. Low-allergen products were also identified for water-needed skin soaps (2 products) and skin disinfectants (4 products). This information is accurate as of the date of publication; product availability and ingredients may change over time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CummingsK, AndersonD, KayeK. Hand hygiene noncompliance and the cost of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2010; 31(4):357–364.
2.
BlancoN, EisenbergMC, StillwellT, et al.What transmission precautions best control influenza spread in a hospital?. Am J Epidemiol, 2016; 183(11):1045–1054.
3.
HilburnJ, HammondB, FendlerE, et al.Use of alcohol hand sanitizer as an infection control strategy in an acute care facility. Am J Infect Control, 2003; 31(2):109–116.
4.
VisscherMO, Randall WickettR. Hand hygiene compliance and irritant dermatitis: a juxtaposition of healthcare issues. Int J Cosmet Sci, 2012; 34(5):402–415.
DewanSS. Antiseptics and disinfectants: global markets to 2022. BCC Res, 2017; 1–198.
8.
NettisE, ColanardiMC, SoccioAL, et al.Occupational irritant and allergic contact dermatitis among healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis, 2002; 46(2):101–107.
9.
WarshawEM, GoodierMC, DeKovenJG, et al.Contact dermatitis associated with skin cleansers: retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data 2000–2014. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(1):32–42.
10.
SchalockPC, DunnickCA, NedorostS, et al.American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergen Series: 2017 update. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(2):141–143.
SchalockPC, DunnickCA, NedorostS, et al.American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergen Series. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(1):7–9.
13.
Food and Drug AdministrationHHS. Safety and effectiveness of health care antiseptics; topical antimicrobial drug products for over-the-counter human use. Final rule. Fed Regist, 2017; 82(242):60474–60503.
14.
VeverkaKK, HallMR, YianniasJA, et al.Trends in patch testing with the Mayo Clinic Standard Series, 2011–2015. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(6):310–315.
15.
DeKovenJG, WarshawEM, ZugKA, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2015–2016. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(6):297–309.
16.
LimHW, CollinsSAB, ResneckJS, et al.The burden of skin disease in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2017; 76(5):958–972.e2.
17.
DiepgenTL. Occupational skin-disease data in Europe. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2003; 76(5):331–338.
18.
NairB. Final report on the safety assessment of benzyl alcohol, benzoic acid, and sodium benzoate. Int J Toxicol, 2001; 20:23–50.
19.
WetterDA, YianniasJA, PrakashAV, et al.Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000–2007. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2010; 63(5):789–798.
20.
SchnuchA, LessmannH, GeierJ, et al.Contact allergy to preservatives. Analysis of IVDK data 1996–2009. Br J Dermatol, 2011; 164(6):1316–1325.
21.
MowadC. Chloroxylenol causing hand dermatitis in a plumber. Am J Contact Dermat, 1998; 9(2):128–129.
22.
WarshawEM, SchramSE, MaibachHI, et al.Occupation-related contact dermatitis in North American health care workers referred for patch testing: cross-sectional data, 1998 to 2004. Dermatitis, 2008; 19(5):261–274.
23.
LessmannH, SchnuchA, GeierJ, et al.Skin-sensitizing and irritant properties of propylene glycol. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 53(5):247–259.
24.
WarshawEM, BottoNC, MaibachHI, et al.Positive patch-test reactions to propylene glycol: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1996 to 2006. Dermatitis, 2009; 20(1):14–20.
LimKS, KamPC. Chlorhexidine—pharmacology and clinical applications. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2008; 36(4):502–512.
27.
WeinsteinRA, MilstoneAM, PassarettiCL, et al.Chlorhexidine: expanding the armamentarium for infection control and prevention. Clin Infect Dis, 2008; 46(2):274–281.
28.
Le CorreY, BarbarotS, FrotAS, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis to chlorhexidine in a very young child. Pediatr Dermatol, 2010; 27(5):485–487.
LiippoJ, KousaP, LammintaustaK. The relevance of chlorhexidine contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 64(4):229–234.
31.
SchemanA, TeR. Contact allergy to cocamide diethanolamine and cross-reactions. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(2):91–92.
32.
KadivarS, BelsitoDV. Occupational dermatitis in health care workers evaluated for suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis, 2015; 26(4):177–183.
Aalto-KorteK, PesonenM, KuulialaO, et al.Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by coconut fatty acids diethanolamide. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 70(3):169–174.
35.
SchemanA, SeversonD. American Contact Dermatitis Society Contact Allergy Management Program: an epidemiologic tool to quantify ingredient usage. Dermatitis, 2016; 27(1):11–13.
