Formaldehyde is a common preservative and strong sensitizer.
Objective
The aim of the study was to evaluate the release of formaldehyde from baby/toddler wet wipes using the chromotropic acid method (CAM).
Methods
An online search of best-selling baby wipes was conducted. None declared formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. Standard CAM procedures were used: a 1 × 1-in square of fresh wipe was placed in a bottle with an open vial of 4 mg/1 mL of chromotropic acid and sulfuric acid solution, sealed, and stored for 48 hours. Formalin and water served as controls. A blinded investigator graded color change (negative, indeterminate, mild, moderate, or strong). For quality control, 20% of all samples as well as all positives were retested.
Results
Fifty-one popular and highly reviewed baby and toddler wet wipe products were tested using CAM. Twelve wipes (24%) released formaldehyde (8 mild, 4 moderate/strong). Chromotropic acid method testing of 9 wipes (18%) was indeterminate and 30 (59%) were negative.
Conclusions
Almost one quarter of baby/toddler wet wipes released formaldehyde when evaluated with CAM. Patients and clinicians should be aware of this potentially undeclared source of this common allergen.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LiteploR, BeauchampR, MeekME, et al.Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 40 Formaldehyde. Geneva, Switzerland: Who Health Organization; 2002.
2.
De GrootAC, Le CozCJ, LensenGJ, et al.Formaldehyde-releasers: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 2. Formaldehyde-releasers in clothes: durable press chemical finishes. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63(1):1–9.
3.
DeKovenJG, WarshawEM, ZugKA, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2015–2016. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(6):297–309.
4.
The National Research Council Committee. Review of the formaldehyde assessment in the National Toxicology Program 12th Report on Carcinogens. Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. 2014; Available at: https://www.nap.edu/resource/18948/formaldehyde-report-highlights-Final2.pdf. Accessed December6, 2018.
5.
PronkoPP, VanRompayPA, ZhangZ, et al.Regulation 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on Cosmetic Products. Off J Eur Union, 2009;(L342):59–209.
HaukssonI, PonténA, GruvbergerB, et al.Skincare products containing low concentrations of formaldehyde detected by the chromotropic acid method cannot be safely used in formaldehyde-allergic patients. Br J Dermatol, 2016; 174(2):371–379.
8.
MoennichJN, HannaDM, JacobSE. Formaldehyde-releasing preservative in baby and cosmetic products. J Dermatol Nurses Assoc, 2009; 1(3):1–4.
BonchakJG, ProutyME, De la FeldSF. Prevalence of contact allergens in personal care products for babies and children. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(2):81–84.
12.
YuJ, TreatJ, ChaneyK, et al.Potential allergens in disposable diaper wipes, topical diaper preparations, and disposable diapers: under-recognized etiology of pediatric perineal dermatitis. Dermatitis, 2016; 27(3):110–118.
13.
WarshawEM, AschenbeckKA, ZugKA, et al.Wet wipe allergens: retrospective analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2011–2014. Dermatitis, 2017; 28(1):64–69.
14.
ChangMW, NakraniR. Six children with allergic contact dermatitis to methylisothiazolinone in wet wipes (baby wipes). Pediatrics, 2014; 133(2):e434–e438.
15.
AdmaniS, MatizC, JacobSE. Methylisothiazolinone: a case of perianal dermatitis caused by wet wipes and review of an emerging pediatric allergen. Pediatr Dermatol, 2014; 31(3):350–352.
16.
GuinJD, KincannonJ, ChurchFL. Baby-wipe dermatitis: preservative-induced hand eczema in parents and persons using moist towelettes. Am J Contact Dermat, 2001; 12(4):189–192.
17.
Piletta-ZaninP, Pasche-KooK, AudersetP, et al.Detection of formaldehyde in moistened baby toilet tissues. Contact Dermatitis, 1998; 38(1):46–47.
18.
PonténA. Formaldehyde in reusable protective gloves. Contact Dermatitis, 2006; 54(5):268–271.
19.
BlohmSG. Formaldehyde contact dermatitis. I. A simple method for determination of small amounts of formaldehyde. Acta Derm Venereol, 1959; 39:450–453.
20.
FregertS, DahlquistI, GruvbergerB. A simple method for the detection of formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis, 1984; 10(3):132–134.
21.
HaukssonI, PonténA, IsakssonM, et al.Formaldehyde in cosmetics in patch tested dermatitis patients with and without contact allergy to formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 74(3):145–151.
22.
HorevL, IsakssonM, EngfeldtM, et al.Preservatives in cosmetics in the Israeli market conform well to the EU legislation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2015; 29(4):761–766.
23.
HamJE, SiegelP, MaibackH. Undeclared formaldehyde levels in patient consumer products: formaldehyde test kit utility. Cutan Ocul Toxicol, 2019; 38(2):112–117.
24.
MalinauskieneL, BlazieneA, ChomicieneA, et al.Formaldehyde may be found in cosmetic products even when unlabelled. Open Med (Warsaw, Poland), 2015; 10(1):323–328.
25.
NikleAB, EricsonME, WarshawEM. Formaldehyde release from personal care products: chromotropic acid method analysis. Dermatitis, 2019; 30(1):67–73.
26.
RastogiSC. Analytical control of preservative labelling on skin creams. Contact Dermatitis, 2000; 43(6):339–343.
27.
LiouYL, BoydA, HylwaSA. What is tetrasodium etidronate and how is it related to formaldehyde?. Dermatitis, 2018; 29(5):p289–p290.
28.
GongS, LiangY, TangL, et al.Determination of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in packaging paper by dansylhydrazine derivatization-high performance liquid chromatography–fluorescence detection. Se Pu, 2017; 35(7):755–759.
29.
DoganCE, SanciR. Formaldehyde migration in aqueous extracts from paper and cardboard food packaging materials in Turkey. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill, 2015; 8(3):221–226.
30.
TrezlL, HullanL, SzarvasT, et al.Determination of endogenous formaldehyde in plants (fruits) bound to L-arginine and its relation to the folate cycle, photosynthesis and apoptosis. Acta Biol Hung, 1998; 49(2–4):253–263.
31.
HansonAD, RojeS. One-carbon metabolism in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 2001; 52:119–137.
32.
HansonAD, GageDA, Shachar-HillY. Plant one-carbon metabolism and its engineering. Trends Plant Sci, 2000; 5(5):206–213.
33.
ClejanLA, CederbaumAI. Stimulation by paraquat of microsomal and cytochrome P-450–dependent oxidation of glycerol to formaldehyde. Biochem J, 1993; 295(3):781–786.
34.
EngelhardtH, KlinknerR. Determination of free formaldehyde in the presence of donators in cosmetics by HPLC and post-column derivation. Chromatographia, 1985; 20(9):559–565.
35.
FlyvholmMA, HallBM, AgnerT, et al.Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing formaldehyde releaser. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 36(1):26–33.
36.
De GrootA, WhiteIR, FlyvholmMA, et al.Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy, Part 2. Patch test relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy, experimental provocation tests, amount of formaldehyde released, and assessment of risk to consumers allergy. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62(1):18–31.
