The aim of the study was to investigate the presence of formaldehyde in textiles using the chromotropic acid method.
Method
Clothing scraps (from local department store tailors, n = 77) and upholstery fabric cuttings (from a furniture reupholstery store, n = 22) were collected. Each fabric was cut into a 1-cm square and tested using the chromotropic acid method. Samples were retested in a systematic fashion (every 10th sample) to assess reproducibility.
Results
All 99 clothing and upholstery fabrics tested negative for formaldehyde release.
Conclusions
Our study suggests that textile manufactures may be using nonformaldehyde resins for durable press finishing in clothing likely to be tailored as well as fabrics used for furniture reupholstery. Additional studies involving other metropolitan areas and a variety of fabrics are needed to confirm these findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aalto-KorteK, KuulialaO, SuuronenK, et al.Occupational contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 59(5):280–289.
2.
HaukssonI, PonténA, GruvbergerB, et al.Skincare products containing low concentrations of formaldehyde detected by the chromotropic acid method cannot be safely used in formaldehyde-allergic patients. Br J Dermatol, 2016; 174(2):371–379.
3.
HaukssonI, PonténA, IsakssonM, et al.Formaldehyde in cosmetics in patch tested dermatitis patients with and without contact allergy to formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 74(3):145–151.
4.
LundovMD, JohansenJD, CarlsenBC, et al.Formaldehyde exposure and patterns of concomitant contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasers. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63(1):31–36.
5.
LyapinaM. Allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde exposure. J IMAB - Annu Proceeding (Scientific Pap), 2012; 18(4):255–262.
6.
RaoS, ShenoySD, DavisS, et al.Detection of formaldehyde in textiles by chromotropic acid method. Indian J Dermatol Venerol Leprol, 2004; 70(6):342–344.
US Government Accountability Office. Formaldehyde in textiles while levels in clothing generally appear to be low, allergic contact dermatitis is a health issue for some people. 2010. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-875. Accessed August1, 2018.
NedorostS, WarshawE, JacobS, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis caused by durable-press finishes does exist in the USA. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63(4):233–234.
11.
HorevL, IsakssonM, EngfeldtM, et al.Preservatives in cosmetics in the Israeli market conform well to the EU legislation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2015; 29(4):761–766.
12.
FregertS, DahlquistI, GruvbergerB. A simple method for the detection of formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis, 1984; 10(3):132–134.
13.
PonténA. Formaldehyde in reusable protective gloves. Contact Dermatitis, 2006; 54(5):268–271.
14.
BlohmSG. Formaldehyde contact dermatitis. I. A simple method for determination of small amounts of formaldehyde. Acta Derm Venereol, 1959; 39:450–453.
15.
HygieneA, AvenueC. The colorimetric estimation of formaldehyde by means of the Hantzsch reaction. Biochem J, 1947; 1952:416–421.
16.
AndrewsBAK, ReinhardtRM. Predicting Release of Formaldehyde from Cellulosic Textiles. Advances in Chemistry Formaldehyde. 1985:83–100. doi:10.1021/ba-1985-0210.ch007.
17.
FlyvholmMA, TiedemannE, MennéT. Comparison of 2 tests for clinical assessment of formaldehyde exposure. Contact Dermatitis, 1996; 34(1):35–38.
18.
MalinauskieneL, BlazieneA, ChomicieneA, et al.Formaldehyde may be found in cosmetic products even when unlabelled. Open Med (Wars), 2015; 10(1):323–328.
19.
De GrootAC, Le CozCJ, LensenGJ, et al.Formaldehyde-releasers: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 2. Formaldehyde-releasers in clothes: durable press chemical finishes. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63(1):1–9.
20.
NovickRM, NelsonML, McKinleyMA, et al.The effect of clothing care activities on textile formaldehyde content. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 2013; 76(14):883–893.
21.
HansonDJ.Formaldehyde in clothing GAO study confirms that levels are low and health risk is likely very small. Chemical & Engineering News Archive, 2010:51–54.
22.
KiracofeEA, ZirwasMJ. Formaldehyde in textiles-what dermatologists need to know about the relationship to contact dermatitis: a review of the US Government Accountability Office's Report to Congressional Committees. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2012; 67(2):313–314.
23.
GoonAT, GruvbergerB, PerssonL, et al.Presence of formaldehyde in topical corticosteroid preparations available on the Swedish market. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 48(4):199–203.
24.
DahlquistI, FregertS, GruvbergerB. Reliability of the chromotropic acid method for qualitative formaldehyde determination. Contact Dermatitis, 1980; 6(5):357–358.
25.
GruvbergerB, BruzeM, TammelaM. Preservatives in moisturizers on the Swedish market. Acta Derm Venereol, 1998; 78(1):52–56.
26.
BerghM, MagnussonK, NilssonJL, et al.Contact allergenic activity of Tween 80 before and after air exposure. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 37(1):9–18.
27.
RastogiSC. Analytical control of preservative labelling on skin creams. Contact Dermatitis, 2000; 43(6):339–343.
28.
EngelhardtH, KlinknerR. Determination of free formaldehyde in the presence of donators in cosmetics by HPLC and post-column derivation. Chromatographia, 1985; 20(9):559–565.
