Atopic dermatitis (AD) associated with respiratory atopy may represent a form of systemic contact dermatitis (SCD), whereby AD flares after ingestion or inhalation of allergens.
Objective
The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of positive patch tests to allergens known to cause SCD in AD patients with and without respiratory atopy.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of patients with AD patch tested to 23 allergens known to cause SCD. Positive patch tests were compared between AD patients with and without respiratory atopy, stratified by age and wet or dry work occupation.
Conclusions
Children and adolescents, but not adults, with AD and respiratory atopy were more likely than age-matched AD patients without respiratory atopy to have positive patch tests to these allergens (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.13–4.79). Moreover, AD patients with respiratory atopy and engaging in wet work, but not dry work, occupations were more likely than AD patients without respiratory atopy to have positive patch tests to allergens known to cause SCD (odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–2.06). Thus, respiratory atopy and wet work are associated with sensitization to allergens known to cause SCD in patients with AD, and patch testing may be valuable in identifying systemic triggers of dermatitis in these patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EllenbogenY, Jimenez-SaizR, SpillP, et al.The initiation of Th2 immunity towards food allergens. Int J Mol Sci, 2018; 19:pii: E1447.
2.
AshleySE, TanHT, VuillerminP, et al.The skin barrier function gene SPINK5 is associated with challenge-proven IgE-mediated food allergy in infants. Allergy, 2017; 72:1356–1364.
3.
BorgL, ChristensenJM, KristiansenJ, et al.Nickel-induced cytokine production from mononuclear cells in nickel-sensitive individuals and controls. Cytokine profiles in nickel-sensitive individuals with nickel allergy-related hand eczema before and after nickel challenge. Arch Dermatol Res, 2000; 292:285–291.
4.
JensenCS, LisbyS, LarsenJK, et al.Characterization of lymphocyte subpopulations and cytokine profiles in peripheral blood of nickel-sensitive individuals with systemic contact dermatitis after oral nickel exposure. Contact Dermatitis, 2004; 50:31–38.
5.
NiiyamaS, TamauchiH, AmohY, et al.Th2 immune response plays a critical role in the development of nickel-induced allergic contact dermatitis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 2010; 153:303–314.
6.
NewellL, PolakME, PereraJ, et al.Sensitization via healthy skin programs Th2 responses in individuals with atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol, 2013; 133:2372–2380.
7.
SchnabelE, SchoeferY, ChenCM, et al.Sensitization to contact allergens and bronchial hyper-responsiveness. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63:157–163.
8.
SpergelJM, PallerAS. Atopic dermatitis and the atopic march. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2003; 112:S118–S127.
9.
KapoorR, MenonC, HoffstadO, et al.The prevalence of atopic triad in children with physician-confirmed atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2008; 58:68–73.
10.
HanH, RoanF, ZieglerSF. The atopic march: current insights into skin barrier dysfunction and epithelial cell-derived cytokines. Immunol Rev, 2017; 278:116–130.
11.
GittlerJK, KruegerJG, Guttman-YasskyE. Atopic dermatitis results in intrinsic barrier and immune abnormalities: implications for contact dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2013; 131:300–313.
12.
FallonPG, SasakiT, SandilandsA, et al.A homozygous frameshift mutation in the mouse Flg gene facilitates enhanced percutaneous allergen priming. Nat Genet, 2009; 41:602–608.
13.
BonnevilleM, ChavagnacC, VocansonM, et al.Skin contact irritation conditions the development and severity of allergic contact dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol, 2007; 127:1430–1435.
14.
DhingraN, GulatiN, Guttman-YasskyE. Mechanisms of contact sensitization offer insights into the role of barrier defects vs. intrinsic immune abnormalities as drivers of atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol, 2013; 133:2311–2314.
15.
KohliN, NedorostS. Inflamed skin predisposes to sensitization to less potent allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2016; 75:312.e1–317.e1.
16.
BoraleviF, HubicheT, Leaute-LabrezeC, et al.Epicutaneous aeroallergen sensitization in atopic dermatitis infants—determining the role of epidermal barrier impairment. Allergy, 2008; 63:205–210.
17.
WerfelT, HeratizadehA, NiebuhrM, et al.Exacerbation of atopic dermatitis on grass pollen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2015; 136:96.e9–103.e9.
18.
NedorostST, CooperKD. The role of patch testing for chemical and protein allergens in atopic dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, 2001; 1:323–328.
19.
BroughHA, LiuAH, SichererS, et al.Atopic dermatitis increases the effect of exposure to peanut antigen in dust on peanut sensitization and likely peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2015; 135:164–170.
20.
Belloni FortinaA, RomanoI, PesericoA. Contact sensitization to Compositae mix in children. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2005; 53:877–880.
21.
FabbroSK, ZirwasMJ. Systemic contact dermatitis to foods: nickel, BOP, and more. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, 2014; 14:463.
KulbergA, SchliemannS, ElsnerP. Contact dermatitis as a systemic disease. Clin Dermatol, 2014; 32:414–419.
24.
CampanaR, MoritzK, MarthK, et al.Frequent occurrence of T cell-mediated late reactions revealed by atopy patch testing with hypoallergenic rBet v 1 fragments. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2016; 137:601.e8–609.e8.
Manual of Contact Dermatitis. 2nd ed. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard; 1981.
27.
CornfeldJ. A statistical problem arising from retrospective studies. In: NeymanJ, ed. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability VB. Berkeley, LA: University of California; 1956.
28.
LachinJM. Biostatistical Methods: The Assessment of Relative Risks. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2011:31.
29.
KirchhofMG, de GannesGC. Atopy associated with positive patch test and possible allergic contact dermatitis. J Cutan Med Surg, 2018; 22:405–410.
30.
JovanovicM, PoljackiM, DuranV, et al.Contact allergy to Compositae plants in patients with atopic dermatitis. Med Pregl, 2004; 57:209–218.
31.
ThyssenJP, JohansenJD, LinnebergA, et al.The association between contact sensitization and atopic disease by linkage of a clinical database and a nationwide patient registry. Allergy, 2012; 67:1157–1164.
32.
Miraglia del GiudiceM, DecimoF, LeonardiS, et al.Immune dysregulation in atopic dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Proc, 2006; 27:451–455.
33.
Kabashima-KuboR, NakamuraM, SakabeJ, et al.A group of atopic dermatitis without IgE elevation or barrier impairment shows a high Th1 frequency: possible immunological state of the intrinsic type. J Dermatol Sci, 2012; 67:37–43.
34.
NedorostST, BabineauD. Patch testing in atopic dermatitis. Dermatitis, 2010; 21:251–254.
