The International Contact Dermatitis Research Group proposes a classification for the clinical presentation of contact allergy. The classification is based primarily on the mode of clinical presentation. The categories are direct exposure/contact dermatitis, mimicking or exacerbation of preexisting eczema, multifactorial dermatitis including allergic contact dermatitis, by proxy, mimicking angioedema, airborne contact dermatitis, photo-induced contact dermatitis, systemic contact dermatitis, noneczematous contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, protein contact dermatitis, respiratory/mucosal symptoms, oral contact dermatitis, erythroderma/exfoliative dermatitis, minor forms of presentation, and extracutaneous manifestations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Gimenez-ArnauA, Gimenez-ArnauE, Serra-BaldrichE, et al.Principles and methodology for identification of fragrance allergens in consumer products. Contact Dermatitis, 2002; 47(6):345–352.
2.
de GrootAC, FroschPJ. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 36(2):57–86.
3.
MorrenMA, Dooms-GoossensA, DelabieJ, et al.Contact allergy to isothiazolinone derivatives: unusual clinical presentations. Dermatology, 1992; 184(4):260–264.
4.
ArmstrongDK, SmithHR, RycroftRJ. Contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile presenting as severe scalp seborrhoeic eczema. Contact Dermatitis, 1999; 40(6):335.
5.
SethuramanG, BansalA, SharmaVK, et al.Seborrhoeic pattern of parthenium dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 58(6):372–374.
6.
PongpairojK, MorarN, McFaddenJP. ‘Seborrhoeic dermatitis’ of the head and neck without scalp involvement—remember nail varnish allergy. Contact Dermatitis, 2016; 74(5):306–307.
7.
KuznetsovAV, Erlenkeuser-UebelhoerI, ThomasP. Contact allergy to propylene glycol and dodecyl gallate mimicking seborrheic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2006; 55(5):307–308.
8.
FotiC, BonamonteD, CassanoN, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis to propyl gallate and pentylene glycol in an emollient cream. Australas J Dermatol, 2010; 51(2):147–148.
9.
LjubojevicS, LipozencicJ, Basta-JuzbasicA. Contact allergy to corticosteroids and Malassezia furfur in seborrhoeic dermatitis patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2011; 25(6):647–651.
10.
MadsenJT, AndersenKE. Airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by methylisothiazolinone in a child sensitized from wet wipes. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 70(3):183–184.
11.
AertsO, CattaertN, LambertJ, et al.Airborne and systemic dermatitis, mimicking atopic dermatitis, caused by methylisothiazolinone in a young child. Contact Dermatitis, 2013; 68(4):250–251.
12.
WilliamsJ, CahillJ, NixonR. Occupational autoeczematization or atopic eczema precipitated by occupational contact dermatitis?. Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 56(1):21–26.
13.
PuangpetP, Lai-CheongJ, McFaddenJP. Chemical atopy. Contact Dermatitis, 2013; 68(4):208–213.
Krupa ShankarDS, ShresthaS. Relevance of patch testing in patients with nummular dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 2005; 71(6):406–408.
16.
FlemingC, ParryE, ForsythA, et al.Patch testing in discoid eczema. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 36(5):261–264.
17.
BonamonteD, FotiC, VestitaM, et al.Nummular eczema and contact allergy: a retrospective study. Dermatitis, 2012; 23(4):153–157.
18.
GilliganP, HorstAV. Allergy to a hot tub water treatment chemical: an unexpectedly common cause of generalized dermatitis in men. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 2010; 3(2):54–56.
19.
van der WalleHB, BrunsveldVM. Dermatitis in hairdressers. (I). The experience of the past 4 years. Contact Dermatitis, 1994; 30(4):217–221.
20.
MolinS, VollmerS, WeissEH, et al.Filaggrin mutations may confer susceptibility to chronic hand eczema characterized by combined allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol, 2009; 161(4):801–807.
21.
TavadiaS, BianchiJ, DaweRS, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis in venous leg ulcer patients. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 48(5):261–265.
22.
RademakerM, WoodB, GreigDE. Multiple medicament allergies in two patients with chronic leg ulceration. Australas J Dermatol, 1996; 37(3):151–152.
23.
McFaddenJ.Patch Testing Tips. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2014.
BernedoN, AudicanaMT, UrielO, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics applied by the patient’s girlfriend. Contact Dermatitis, 2004; 50(4):252–253.
26.
VeyseyEC, BurgeS, CooperS. Consort contact dermatitis to paraphenylenediamine, with an unusual clinical presentation of tumid plaques. Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 56(6):366–367.
27.
HospitalV, AmargerS, FranckF, et al.Proxy lymphomatoid contact dermatitis [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 2011; 138(4):315–318.
28.
SwinyerLJ.Connubial contact dermatitis from perfumes. Contact Dermatitis, 1980; 6(3):226.
29.
JensenP, Garcia OrtizP, Hartmann-PetersenS, et al.Connubial allergic contact dermatitis caused by fragrance ingredients. Dermatitis, 2012; 23(1):e1–e2.
30.
HeldJL, RuszkowskiAM, DeleoVA. Consort contact dermatitis due to oak moss. Arch Dermatol, 1988; 124(2):261–262.
GokalpH, KayaK.Angioedema-like allergic contact dermatitis related to black henna. Dermatol Online J, 2014; 20(2).
33.
Tukenmez DemirciG, Kivanc AltunayI, AtisG, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis mimicking angioedema due to paraphenylenediamine hypersensitivity: a case report. Cutan Ocul Toxicol, 2012; 31(3):250–252.
34.
AlwanW, WhiteIR, BanerjeeP. Presumed airborne contact allergy to methylisothiazolinone causing acute severe facial dermatitis and respiratory difficulty. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 70(5):320–321.
35.
PirkerC, MisicA, FroschPJ. Angioedema and dysphagia caused by contact allergy to inhaled budesonide. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 49(2):77–79.
36.
Sánchez-GuerreroIM, HuertasAJ, LópezMP, et al.Angioedema-like allergic contact dermatitis to castor oil. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62(5):318–319.
37.
MinciulloPL, PatafiM, GiannettoL, et al.Allergic contact angioedema to benzoyl peroxide. J Clin Pharm Ther, 2006; 31(4):385–387.
38.
BuchananR, HuynhG, TannerJ. Extensive scalp angioedema following high-dose diphenylcyclopropenone for alopecia areata. Hosp Pharm, 2014; 49(1):48–51.
39.
KindF, SchererK, BircherAJ. Allergic contact stomatitis to cinnamon in chewing gum mistaken as facial angioedema. Allergy, 2010; 65(2):276–277.
40.
InalA, AltintaşDU, GüvenmezHK, et al.Life-threatening facial edema due to pine caterpillar mimicking an allergic event. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr), 2006; 34(4):171–173.
41.
BreuerK, UterW, GeierJ. Epidemiological data on airborne contact dermatitis—results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis, 2015; 73(4):239–247.
42.
SwinnenI, GoossensA. An update on airborne contact dermatitis: 2007-2011. Contact Dermatitis, 2013; 68(4):232–238.
PirmezR, FernandesAL, MeloMG. Photoaggravated contact dermatitis to Kathon CG (methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone): a novel pattern of involvement in a growing epidemic?. Br J Dermatol, 2015; 173(5):1343–1344.
47.
ArmisénM, RodríguezV, VidalC. Photoaggravated allergic contact dermatitis due to Rosmarinus officinalis cross-reactive with Thymus vulgaris. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 48(1):52–53.
48.
IzuR, AguirreA, GoicoecheaA, et al.Photoaggravated allergic contact dermatitis due to topical thiabendazole. Contact Dermatitis, 1993; 28(4):243–244.
49.
DurieuC, MargueryMC, Giordano-LabadieF, et al.Photoaggravated contact allergy and contact photoallergy caused by ketoprofen: 19 cases [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 2001; 128(10 Pt 1):1020–1024.
50.
KwokT, RosenCF, StorrsFJ, et al.Persistent photosensitivity after allergic contact dermatitis to epoxy resin. Dermatitis, 2013; 24(3):124–130.
51.
BachurzewskaB, BoruckaI, OgonowskiE. Occupationally-induced allergic and photoallergic reactions to epoxide resins in railroad employees [in German]. Derm Beruf Umwelt, 1988; 36(4):125–127.
52.
ChewAL, BashirSJ, HawkJL, et al.Contact and photocontact sensitization in chronic actinic dermatitis: a changing picture. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62(1):42–46.
53.
FabbroSK, ZirwasMJ. Systemic contact dermatitis to foods: nickel, BOP, and more. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, 2014; 14(10):463.
MalinauskieneL, IsakssonM, BruzeM. Systemic contact dermatitis in a gold-allergic patient after treatment with an oral homeopathic drug. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2013; 68(2):e58.
56.
IsakssonM, BruzeM. Allergic contact dermatitis in response to budesonide reactivated by inhalation of the allergen. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2002; 46(6):880–885.
57.
MöllerH, OhlssonK, LinderC, et al.The flare-up reactions after systemic provocation in contact allergy to nickel and gold. Contact Dermatitis, 1999; 40(4):200–204.
KimJE, LeeSY, LeeJS, et al.Clinical features of systemic contact dermatitis due to the ingestion of lacquer in the province of Chungcheongnam-do. Ann Dermatol, 2012; 24(3):319–323.
60.
Ancona-AlayonA, Escobar-MarquesR, Gonalez-MendozaA, et al.Occupational pigmented contact dermatitis from Naphthol AS. Contact Dermatitis, 1976; 2(3):129–134.
HamadaT, HoriguchiS. Chronic melanodermatitis due to the rubber peephole of a ship radarscope. Contact Dermatitis, 1978; 4(4):245–246.
63.
TatebayashiM, OisoN, WadaT, et al.Possible allergic contact dermatitis with reticulate postinflammatory pigmentation caused by hydroquinone. J Dermatol, 2014; 41(7):669–670.
64.
ValsecchiR, LeghissaP, Di LandroA, et al.Persistent leukoderma after henna tattoo. Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 56(2):108–109.
65.
Kiec-SwierczynskaM, KreciszB, Swierczynska-MachuraD. Allergy to p-phenylenediamine from a black transferable picture tattoo—hypopigmentation and sensitization to clothing dyes in a little girl. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 58(3):174–175.
66.
JappeU, HausenBM, PetzoldtD. Erythema-multiforme-like eruption and depigmentation following allergic contact dermatitis from a paint-on henna tattoo, due to para-phenylenediamine contact hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis, 2001; 45(4):249–250.
GrangeA, RothB, TortelMC, et al.Chromium-induced vasculitis-like purpuric allergic contact dermatitis [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 2005; 132(12 Pt 1):993–995.
78.
ShimunesE.Purpuric allergic contact dermatitis to paraphenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis, 1978; 4(4):225–229.
79.
OrbakZ, YildirimZK, SepetciO, et al.Adverse reaction of topical etofenamate: petechial eruption. West Indian Med J, 2012; 61(7):767–769.
80.
Roldán-MarínR, de-la-Barreda BecerrilF. Petechial and purpuric eruption induced by lidocaine/prilocaine cream: a rare side effect. J Drugs Dermatol, 2009; 8(3):287–288.
LemboG, BalatoN, PatrunoC, et al.Lichenoid contact dermatitis due to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Contact Dermatitis, 1987; 17(2):122–123.
88.
KawamuraT, FukudaS, OhtakeN, et al.Lichen planus-like contact dermatitis due to methacrylic acid esters. Br J Dermatol, 1996; 134(2):358–360.
89.
SchlosserBJ.Lichen planus and lichenoid reactions of the oral mucosa. Dermatol Ther, 2010; 23(3):251–267.
90.
FrykholmKO, FrithiofL, FernstromAI, et al.Allergy to copper derived from dental alloys as a possible cause of oral lesions of lichen planus. Acta Derm Venereol, 1969; 49(3):268–281.
91.
IdoT, KumakiriM, KiyoharaT, et al.Oral lichen planus due to zinc in dental restorations. Contact Dermatitis, 2002; 47(1):51.
92.
LaineJ, KalimoK, ForssellH, et al.Resolution of oral lichenoid lesions after replacement of amalgam restorations in patients allergic to mercury compounds. Br J Dermatol, 1992; 126(1):10–15.
93.
AthavalePN, ShumKW, YeomanCM, et al.Oral lichenoid lesions and contact allergy to dental mercury and gold. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 49(5):264–265.
94.
SharmaR, HandaS, DeD, et al.Role of dental restoration materials in oral mucosal lichenoid lesions. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 2015; 81(5):478–484.
95.
AhlgrenC, BruzeM, MöllerH, et al.Contact allergy to gold in patients with oral lichen lesions. Acta Derm Venereol, 2012; 92(2):138–143.
96.
ScalfLA, FowlerJFJr, MorganKW, et al.Dental metal allergy in patients with oral, cutaneous, and genital lichenoid reactions. Am J Contact Dermat, 2001; 12(3):146–150.
BarrientosN, AbajoP, de VegaMM, et al.Erythema multiforme-like eruption following allergic contact dermatitis in response to para-phenylenediamine in a temporary henna tattoo. Int J Dermatol, 2014; 53(7):e348–e350.
AffeeHS, DresslerDP. Topical application of mafenide acetate. Its association with erythema multiforme and cutaneous reactions. Arch Dermatol, 1969; 100(3):277–281.
107.
DegreefH, BonamieA, van DerheydenD, et al.Mephenesin contact dermatitis with erythema multiforme features. Contact Dermatitis, 1984; 10(4):220–223.
108.
KerreS, BusschotsA, Dooms-GoossensA. Erythema-multiforme-like contact dermatitis due to phenylbutazone. Contact Dermatitis, 1995; 33(3):213–214.
109.
KochP, BahmerFA. Erythema-multiforme-like, urticarial papular and plaque eruptions from bufexamac: report of 4 cases. Contact Dermatitis, 1994; 31(2):97–101.
110.
WalchnerM, RueffF, PrzybillaB. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to mofebutazone underlying a severe drug reaction. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 36(1):54–55.
111.
StingeniL, CaraffiniS, AssalveD, et al.Erythema-multiforme-like contact dermatitis from budesonide. Contact Dermatitis, 1996; 34(2):154–155.
112.
ValsecchiR, ReseghettiA, LeghissaP, et al.Erythema-multiforme-like lesions from triamcinolone acetonide. Contact Dermatitis, 1998; 38(6):362–363.
113.
WhitfeldMJ, RiversJK. Erythema multiforme after contact dermatitis in response to an epoxy sealant. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1991; 25(2 Pt 2):386–388.
114.
Van SteenkisteE, GoossensA, MeertH, et al.Airborne-induced lymphomatoid contact dermatitis caused by methylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis, 2015; 72(4):237–240.
115.
González-PérezR, Ruiz-CarrilloG, SoloetaR. Sarcoid-type allergic contact granuloma caused by earrings in a boy. Actas Dermosifiliogr, 2012; 103(1):73–74.
116.
BergforsE, HermanssonG, Nystrom KronanderU, et al.How common are long-lasting, intensely itching vaccination granulomas and contact allergy to aluminium induced by currently used pediatric vaccines? A prospective cohort study. Eur J Pediatr, 2014; 173(10):1297–1307.
117.
BurkhartCG.Pustular allergic contact dermatitis: a distinct clinical and pathological entity. Cutis, 1981; 27(6):630–631, 8.
Sanchez-MotillaJM, PontV, NagoreE, et al.Pustular allergic contact dermatitis from minoxidil. Contact Dermatitis, 1998; 38(5):283–284.
120.
VermaA, TancharoenC, TamMM, et al.Pustular allergic contact dermatitis caused by fragrances. Contact Dermatitis, 2015; 72(4):245–248.
121.
LonngrenV, YoungE, SimanaitisM, et al.Neutrophilic and eosinophilic dermatitis caused by contact allergic reaction to paraphenylenediamine in hair dye. Arch Dermatol, 2012; 148(11):1299–1301.
122.
NajemN, Bagher ZadehV. Allergic contact dermatitis to black henna. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat, 2011; 20(2):87–88.
123.
ChassetF, PecquetC, CuryK, et al.Bullous rash around a peritoneal dialysis catheter exit site [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 2015; 142(6–7):438–442.
124.
VogelTA, ChristoffersWA, EngfeldtM, et al.Severe bullous allergic contact dermatitis caused by glycidyl methacrylate and other acrylates. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 71(4):247–249.
125.
ChristoffersWA, CoenraadsPJ, SchuttelaarML. Bullous allergic reaction caused by colophonium in medical adhesives. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 70(4):256–257.
126.
Gómez-FernándezC, Ramírez-MarínP, Rubio-PérezM, et al.Bullous allergic contact dermatitis caused by Critonia aromatisans. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 65(1):57–58.
127.
YamakageA, IshikawaH, SaitoY, et al.Occupational scleroderma-like disorder occurring in men engaged in the polymerization of epoxy resins. Dermatologica, 1980; 161(1):33–44.
128.
GuidettiMS, VincenziC, PapiM, et al.Sclerodermatous skin reaction after vitamin K1 injections. Contact Dermatitis, 1994; 31(1):45–46.
129.
ChiuCS, TsaiYL. Cheilitis granulomatosa associated with allergic contact dermatitis to betel quid. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 58(4):246–247.
130.
FitzpatrickL, HealyCM, McCartanBE, et al.Patch testing for food-associated allergies in orofacial granulomatosis. J Oral Pathol Med, 2011; 40(1):10–13.
131.
WongGA, ShearNH. Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome associated with allergic contact dermatitis from octyl and dodecyl gallates. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 49(5):266–267.
132.
ArmstrongDK, BiagioniP, LameyPJ, et al.Contact hypersensitivity in patients with orofacial granulomatosis. Am J Contact Dermat, 1997; 8(1):35–38.
133.
Gimenez-ArnauA, MaurerM, De La CuadraJ, et al.Immediate contact skin reactions, an update of contact urticaria, contact urticaria syndrome and protein contact dermatitis—“A never ending story”. Eur J Dermatol, 2010; 20(5):552–562.
CalnanCD, ShusterS. Reactions to ammonium persulfate. Arch Dermatol, 1963; 88:812–815.
136.
BlaabjergMS, AndersenKE, Bindslev-JensenC, et al.Decrease in the rate of sensitization and clinical allergy to natural rubber latex. Contact Dermatitis, 2015; 73(1):21–28.
137.
HelgesenAL, AustadJ. Contact urticaria from aluminium and nickel in the same patient. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 37(6):303–304.
138.
EstlanderT, KanervaL, TupaselaO, et al.Immediate and delayed allergy to nickel with contact urticaria, rhinitis, asthma and contact dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy, 1993; 23(4):306–310.
139.
StutzN, HertlM, LofflerH. Anaphylaxis caused by contact urticaria because of epoxy resins: an extraordinary emergency. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 58(5):307–309.
140.
StingeniL, BelliniV, LisiP. Occupational airborne contact urticaria and asthma: simultaneous immediate and delayed allergy to diphenylmethane-4,4’-diisocyanate. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 58(2):112–113.
141.
LeheronC, BourrierT, AlbertiniM, et al.Immediate contact urticaria caused by hydrolysed wheat proteins in a child via maternal skin contact sensitization. Contact Dermatitis, 2013; 68(6):379–380.
142.
ChinukiY, TakahashiH, DekioI, et al.Higher allergenicity of high molecular weight hydrolysed wheat protein in cosmetics for percutaneous sensitization. Contact Dermatitis, 2013; 68(2):86–93.
143.
LauriereM, PecquetC, Bouchez-MahioutI, et al.Hydrolysed wheat proteins present in cosmetics can induce immediate hypersensitivities. Contact Dermatitis, 2006; 54(5):283–289.
144.
SanoA, YagamiA, SuzukiK, et al.Two Cases of Occupational Contact Urticaria Caused by Percutaneous Sensitization to Parvalbumin. Case Rep Dermatol, 2015; 7(2):227–232.
145.
LevinC, WarshawE. Protein contact dermatitis: allergens, pathogenesis, and management. Dermatitis, 2008; 19(5):241–251.
146.
RochaJ, PereiraT, Sousa-BastoA, et al.Occupational protein contact dermatitis: two case reports. Case Rep Med, 2010. doi: 10.1155/2010/489627.
147.
BarbaudA, PoreauxC, PenvenE, et al.Occupational protein contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol, 2015; 25(6):527–543.
148.
KumarA, FreemanS. Protein contact dermatitis in food workers. Case report of a meat sorter and summary of seven other cases. Australas J Dermatol, 1999; 40(3):138–140.
149.
TostiA, GuerraL. Protein contact dermatitis in food handlers. Contact Dermatitis, 1988; 19(2):149–150.
150.
BarataAR, Conde-SalazarL. Protein contact dermatitis—case report. An Bras Dermatol, 2013; 88(4):611–613.
151.
KwokC, MoneyA, CarderM, et al.Cases of occupational dermatitis and asthma in beauticians that were reported to The Health and Occupation Research (THOR) network from 1996 to 2011. Clin Exp Dermatol, 2014; 39(5):590–595.
152.
SchnabelE, SchoeferY, ChenCM, et al.Sensitization to contact allergens and bronchial hyper-responsiveness. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63(3):157–163.
153.
SzemaAM, BarnettT. Allergic reaction to mint leads to asthma. Allergy Rhinol (Providence), 2011; 2(1):43–45.
154.
BroidesA, SoferS, LazarI. Contact dermatitis with severe scalp swelling and upper airway compromise due to black henna hair dye. Pediatr Emerg Care, 2011; 27(8):745–746.
155.
PoltronieriA, PatriniL, PigattoP, et al.Occupational allergic “march”. Rapid evolution of contact dermatitis to ammonium persulfate into airborne contact dermatitis with rhinitis and asthma in a hairdresser [in Italian]. Med Lav, 2010; 101(6):403–408.
156.
SartorelliP, PistolesiP, CioniF, et al.Skin and respiratory allergic disease caused by polyfunctional aziridine [in Italian]. Med Lav, 2003; 94(3):285–295.
157.
Raison-PeyronN, Co MinhHB, Vidal-MazuyA, et al.Connubial contact dermatitis to an inhaled corticosteroid [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 2005; 132(2):143–146.
158.
DitrichovaD, KapralovaS, TichyM, et al.Oral lichenoid lesions and allergy to dental materials. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub, 2007; 151(2):333–339.
159.
KhamaysiZ, BergmanR, WeltfriendS. Positive patch test reactions to allergens of the dental series and the relation to the clinical presentations. Contact Dermatitis, 2006; 55(4):216–218.
160.
BakulaA, Lugović-MihićL, SitumM, et al.Contact allergy in the mouth: diversity of clinical presentations and diagnosis of common allergens relevant to dental practice. Acta Clin Croat, 2011; 50(4):553–561.
BlomgrenJ, AxéllT, SandahlO, et al.Adverse reactions in the oral mucosa associated with anterior composite restorations. J Oral Pathol Med, 1996; 25(6):311–313.
164.
LindPO.Oral lichenoid reactions related to composite restorations. Preliminary report. Acta Odontol Scand, 1988; 46(1):63–65.
165.
KoutisD, FreemanS. Allergic contact stomatitis caused by acrylic monomer in a denture. Australas J Dermatol, 2001; 42(3):203–206.
166.
ConnollyM, ShawL, HutchinsonI, et al.Allergic contact dermatitis from bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate during application of orthodontic fixed appliance. Contact Dermatitis, 2006; 55(6):367–368.
167.
HallströmU.Adverse reaction to a fissure sealant: report of case. ASDC J Dent Child, 1993; 60(2):143–146.
168.
KalBI, EvcinO, DundarN, et al.An unusual case of immediate hypersensitivity reaction associated with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J, 2008; 205(10):547–550.
169.
NobleJ, AhingSI, KaraiskosNE, et al.Nickel allergy and orthodontics, a review and report of two cases. Br Dent J, 2008; 204(6):297–300.
LhotkaCG, SzekeresT, Fritzer-SzekeresM, et al.Are allergic reactions to skin clips associated with delayed wound healing?. Am J Surg, 1998; 176(4):320–323.
173.
EgusaH, KoN, ShimazuT, et al.Suspected association of an allergic reaction with titanium dental implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent, 2008; 100(5):344–347.
174.
MitchellDL, SynnottSA, VanDercreekJA. Tissue reaction involving an intraoral skin graft and CP titanium abutments: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1990; 5(1):79–84.
175.
NawazF, WallBM. Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: suspected association with titanium bioprosthesis. Am J Med Sci, 2007; 334(3):215–218.
176.
CroninE.Formaldehyde is a significant allergen in women with hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis, 1991; 25(5):276–282.
177.
AgnerT, FlyvholmMA, MennéT. Formaldehyde allergy: a follow-up study. Am J Contact Dermat, 1999; 10(1):12–17.
178.
TasE, PletscherM, BircherAJ. IgE-mediated urticaria from formaldehyde in a dental root canal compound. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 2002; 12(2):130–133.
179.
KijimaA, NishinoH, UmedaJ, et al.Type 1 allergy to formaldehyde in root canal sealant after dental treatment: two case reports and review of the literature [in Japanese]. Arerugi, 2007; 56(11):1397–1402.
180.
BraunJJ, ZanaH, PurohitA, et al.Anaphylactic reactions to formaldehyde in root canal sealant after endodontic treatment: four cases of anaphylactic shock and three of generalized urticaria. Allergy, 2003; 58(11):1210–1215.
181.
HaikelY, BraunJJ, ZanaH, et al.Anaphylactic shock during endodontic treatment due to allergy to formaldehyde in a root canal sealant. J Endod, 2000; 26(9):529–531.
182.
SilvestreJF, AlbaresMP, BlanesM, et al.Allergic contact gingivitis due to eugenol present in a restorative dental material. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 52(6):341.
183.
CaliskanMK, TurkunM, AlperS. Allergy to sodium hypochlorite during root canal therapy: a case report. Int Endod J, 1994; 27(3):163–167.
184.
ChinSM, FergusonJW, BajurnowsT. Latex allergy in dentistry. Review and report of case presenting as a serious reaction to latex dental dam. Aust Dent J, 2004; 49(3):146–148.
185.
DowneyD.Contact mucositis due to palladium. Contact Dermatitis, 1989; 21(1):54.
186.
GarauV, MasalaMG, CortisMC, et al.Contact stomatitis due to palladium in dental alloys: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent, 2005; 93(4):318–320.
187.
MizoguchiS, SetoyamaM, KanzakiT. Linear lichen planus in the region of the mandibular nerve caused by an allergy to palladium in dental metals. Dermatology, 1998; 196(2):268–270.
188.
TorresV, Mano-AzulAC, CorreiaT, et al.Allergic contact cheilitis and stomatitis from hydroquinone in an acrylic dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis, 1993; 29(2):102–103.
189.
Gonzalo-GarijoMA, Pérez-CalderónR, de ArgilaD, et al.Erythrodermia to pseudoephedrine in a patient with contact allergy to phenylephrine. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr), 2002; 30(4):239–242.
GuancheAD, PrawerS. Generalized eczematous contact dermatitis from cocobolo wood. Am J Contact Dermat, 2003; 14(2):90–92.
192.
LazarovA.Textile dermatitis in patients with contact sensitization in Israel: a 4-year prospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2004; 18(5):531–537.
193.
DubielW, HappleR. Experimental treatment with fumaric acid monoethylester in psoriasis vulgaris [in German]. Z Haut Geschlechtskr, 1972; 47(13):545–550.
BhatJ, SmithAG. Xanthelasma palpebrarum following allergic contact dermatitis from para-phenylenediamine in a black eyelash-tinting product. Contact Dermatitis, 2003; 49(6):311.
VermaP, YadavP. Paraphenylenediamine dye allergic contact dermatitis of mustache region manifesting as prurigo nodularis-like lesions. Dermatitis, 2014; 25(2):91–92.
206.
TognettiL, GiorginiS, LottiT. Prurigo-like eczema as an unsuspected presentation of textile dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol, 2011; 21(1):139–140.
207.
SinghS, KhandpurS, SharmaVK. Allergic contact dermatitis to Parthenium hysterophorus mimicking actinic prurigo. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 2015; 81(1):82–84.
208.
MestachL, GoossensA. Allergic contact dermatitis and nail damage mimicking psoriasis caused by nail hardeners. Contact Dermatitis, 2015; 74(2):112–114.
209.
JoJH, JangHS, KoHC, et al.Pustular psoriasis and the Kobner phenomenon caused by allergic contact dermatitis from zinc pyrithione-containing shampoo. Contact Dermatitis, 2005; 52(3):142–144.
210.
NielsenNH, MennéT. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by zinc pyrithione associated with pustular psoriasis. Am J Contact Dermat, 1997; 8(3):170–171.
PilettaP, Pasche-KooF, SauratJH. Contact dermatitis from tioconazole mimicking “one hand two feet syndrome”. Contact Dermatitis, 1993; 28(5):308.
213.
AertsO, Van DyckF, DandelooyJ, et al.Contact dermatitis masquerading as folliculitis decalvans: methylisothiazolinone strikes again!. Dermatitis, 2014; 25(5):276.
214.
AertsO, BaeckM, ConstandtL, et al.The dramatic increase in the rate of methylisothiazolinone contact allergy in Belgium: a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 71(1):41–48.
215.
AntelmiA, SvedmanC, HaukssonI, et al.An unusual manifestation of hair dye allergy with occupational consequences. Occup Med Health Aff, 2014; 2:180.
216.
KanervaL, TarvainenK, PinolaA, et al.A single accidental exposure may result in a chemical burn, primary sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 1994; 31(4):229–235.
217.
AebyP, SieberT, BeckH, et al.Skin sensitization to p-phenylenediamine: the diverging roles of oxidation and N-acetylation for dendritic cell activation and the immune response. J Invest Dermatol, 2009; 129(1):99–109.
218.
HoSG, BasketterDA, JefferiesD, et al.Analysis of para-phenylenediamine allergic patients in relation to strength of patch test reaction. Br J Dermatol, 2005; 153(2):364–367.
219.
MikhaelMM, HanssenAD, SierraRJ. Failure of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty mimicking hip infection. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009; 91(2):443–446.
220.
CampbellP, ShimminA, WalterL, et al.Metal sensitivity as a cause of groin pain in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty, 2008; 23(7):1080–1085.
221.
JensenP, ThyssenJP, RetpenJB, et al.Cobalt allergy and suspected aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vascular-associated lesion following total hip arthroplasty. Contact Dermatitis, 2009; 61(4):238–239.
222.
HauptfleischJ, PanditH, GrammatopoulosG, et al.A MRI classification of periprosthetic soft tissue masses (pseudotumours) associated with metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol, 2012; 41(2):149–155.
223.
MalviyaA, HollandJP. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: 10-year Newcastle experience. Acta Orthop Belg, 2009; 75(4):477–483.
224.
PanditH, Glyn-JonesS, McLardy-SmithP, et al.Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg, 2008; 90(7):847–851.
225.
BeneveniaJ, LeeFY, BuechelF, et al.Pathologic supracondylar fracture due to osteolytic pseudotumor of knee following cementless total knee replacement. J Biomed Mater Res, 1998; 43(4):473–477.
226.
DietrichKA, MazoochianF, SummerB, et al.Intolerance reactions to knee arthroplasty in patients with nickel/cobalt allergy and disappearance of symptoms after revision surgery with titanium-based endoprostheses. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, 2009; 7(5):410–413.
227.
HaddadFS, CobbAG, BentleyG, et al.Hypersensitivity in aseptic loosening of total hip replacements. The role of constituents of bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg, 1996; 78(4):546–549.
228.
ThomasP, BraathenLR, DorigM, et al.Increased metal allergy in patients with failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty and peri-implant T-lymphocytic inflammation. Allergy, 2009; 64(8):1157–1165.
229.
ReedKB, DavisMD, NakamuraK, et al.Retrospective evaluation of patch testing before or after metal device implantation. Arch Dermatol, 2008; 144(8):999–1007.
230.
HonariG, EllisSG, WilkoffBL, et al.Hypersensitivity reactions associated with endovascular devices. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 59(1):7–22.
231.
Basko-PlluskaJL, ThyssenJP, SchalockPC. Cutaneous and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants. Dermatitis, 2011; 22(2):65–79.
232.
ParkSJ, LeeCW, HongMK, et al.Comparison of gold-coated NIR stents with uncoated NIR stents in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol, 2002; 89(7):872–875.
233.
GehmanS.Increased risk of restenosis after placement of gold-coated stents. Circulation, 2001; 104(5):E23.
234.
KastratiA, SchömigA, DirschingerJ, et al.Increased risk of restenosis after placement of gold-coated stents: results of a randomized trial comparing gold-coated with uncoated steel stents in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation, 2000; 101(21):2478–2483.
235.
SvedmanC, EkqvistS, MollerH, et al.A correlation found between contact allergy to stent material and restenosis of the coronary arteries. Contact Dermatitis, 2009; 60(3):158–164.
236.
EkqvistS, SvedmanC, MollerH, et al.High frequency of contact allergy to gold in patients with endovascular coronary stents. Br J Dermatol, 2007; 157(4):730–738.
