A directive restricting nickel release from jewelry and other skin-contact products has not been initiated in Thailand or in the United States. The prevalence of nickel and cobalt allergies is increasing, and the main cause of sensitization seems to be jewelry.
Objectives
We aimed to investigate nickel and cobalt release from jewelry available in Thai marketplaces and to study the factors associated with nickel and cobalt release.
Methods
Used costume jewelry items were collected from volunteers. They were tested with the dimethylglyoxime and cobalt tests.
Results
Five hundred fifty-one items, including belt buckles, bracelets, earrings, necklaces, rings, and watches, were tested; 216 (39.2%) gave positive dimethylglyoxime tests, and 206 (37.4%) gave positive cobalt tests. The factors that determined nickel or cobalt release were shopping location and jewelry price. Cobalt-containing jewelry could be identified by its dark color.
Conclusions
A large proportion of the jewelry sold in Thai markets release nickel or cobalt.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ThyssenJP, LinnebergA, MenneT, et al.The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population—prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis, 2007; 57: 287–299.
2.
ThyssenJP, MenneT. Metal allergy—a review on exposures, penetration, genetics, prevalence, and clinical implications. Chem Res Toxicol, 2010; 23: 309–318.
3.
HamannCR, HamannDJ, HamannQJ, et al.Assessment of nickel release from earrings randomly purchased in China and Thailand using the dimethylglyoxime test. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62: 232–240.
4.
GarnerLA. Contact dermatitis to metals. Dermatol Ther, 2004; 17: 321–327.
5.
SantucciB, FerrariPV, CristaudoA, et al.Nickel dermatitis from cheap earrings. Contact Dermatitis, 1989; 21: 245–248.
6.
European Communities. European Dir. 94/27/EC of 30 June 1994 amending for the 12th time Dir. 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of dangerous substances. Official J Eur Communities, 1994; 37: 1–2.
7.
ThyssenJP. Nickel and cobalt allergy before and after nickel regulation—evaluation of a public health intervention. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 65 (Suppl 1): 1–68.
8.
GargS, ThyssenJP, UterW, et al.Nickel allergy following European Union regulation in Denmark, Germany, Italy and the U.K. Br J Dermatol, 2013; 169: 854–858.
9.
BoonchaiW, IamtharachaiP, SunthonpalinP. Prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis in Thailand. Dermatitis, 2008; 19: 142–145.
10.
ThyssenJP, LinnebergA, MenneT, et al.Contact allergy to allergens of the TRUE-test (panels 1 and 2) has decreased modestly in the general population. Br J Dermatol, 2009; 161: 1124–1129.
11.
ThyssenJP, SkareL, LundgrenL, et al.Sensitivity and specificity of the nickel spot (dimethylglyoxime) test. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 62: 279–288.
12.
CheongSH, ChoiYW, ChoiHY, et al.Nickel and cobalt release from jewellery and metal clothing items in Korea. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 70: 11–18.
13.
ThyssenJP, MenneT, JohansenJD, et al.A spot test for detection of cobalt release—early experience and findings. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63: 63–69.
14.
BoonchaiW, IamtharachaiP. Risk factors for common contact allergens and patch test results using a modified European baseline series in patients tested during between 2000 and 2009 at Siriraj Hospital. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol, 2014; 32: 60–65.
15.
NielsenNH, MenneT. Nickel sensitization and ear piercing in an unselected Danish population. Glostrup Allergy Study. Contact Dermatitis, 1993; 29: 16–21.
16.
UterW, SchmidM, SchmidtO, et al.Cobalt release from earrings and piercing jewellery—analytical results of a German survey. Contact Dermatitis, 2014; 70: 369–375.
17.
BiesterbosJ, LidenC, van der ValkP. Nickel on the Dutch market: 10 years after entry into force of the EU Nickel Directive. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 65: 115–117.
18.
BiesterbosJ, YazarK, LidenC. Nickel on the Swedish market: follow-up 10 years after entry into force of the EU Nickel Directive. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63: 333–339.
19.
ThyssenJP, MenneT, LidenC, et al.Excessive nickel release from earrings purchased from independent shops and street markets—a field study from Warsaw and London. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2011; 25: 1021–1026.
20.
HamannD, HamannC, LiLF, et al.The Sino-American belt study: nickel and cobalt exposure, epidemiology, and clinical considerations. Dermatitis, 2012; 23: 117–123.
21.
HolbrookJ, MinochaJ, LaumannA. Body piercing: complications and prevention of health risks. Am J Clin Dermatol, 2012; 13: 1–17.
22.
ThyssenJP, MaibachHI. Nickel release from earrings purchased in the United States: the San Francisco earring study. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2008; 58: 1000–1005.
23.
LidenC. Nickel in jewellery and associated products. Contact Dermatitis, 1992; 26: 73–75.
24.
LepoittevinJP, MidanderK, ThyssenJP, et al.Nomenclature of metal allergens in contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 65: 1–2.
25.
ThyssenJP, JohansenJD, MenneT, et al.Nickel allergy in Danish women before and after nickel regulation. N Engl J Med, 2009; 360: 2259–2260.
26.
ThyssenJP, JellesenMS, MenneT, et al.Cobalt release from inexpensive jewellery: has the use of cobalt replaced nickel following regulatory intervention?. Contact Dermatitis, 2010; 63: 70–76.
27.
HamannC, HamannD, HamannKK, et al.Cobalt release from inexpensive earrings from Thailand and China. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 64: 238–240.
28.
ThyssenJP. Cobalt sensitization and dermatitis: considerations for the clinician. Dermatitis, 2012; 23: 203–209.
