Titanium is notable for its biocompatibility and is used as biologic implant material across surgical specialties, especially in metal-sensitive individuals. However, rare cases of titanium hypersensitivity reactions are reported in the literature. This article discusses the properties and biological behavior of titanium and provides a thorough review of the literature on reported cases, diagnostic techniques, and approach to management of titanium hypersensitivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
OshidaY.Introduction. In: OshidaY., ed. Bioscience and Bioengineering of Titanium Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2013: 1–8.
2.
Standard specification for titanium and titanium alloy strip, sheet, and plate [ASTM Web site]. 1996–2014. Available at: http://www.astm.org/Standards/B265.htm. Accessed August7, 2014.
3.
DonachieMJJr. The titanium alloys. In: DonachieMJJr. Titanium: A Technical Guide. 2nd ed. Materials Park, OH: ASM International; 1988: 5–11.
4.
OshidaY.Materials classification. In: OshidaY., ed. Bioscience and Bioengineering of Titanium Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2013: 9–34.
5.
HarloffT, HönleW, HolzwarthU, et al.Titanium allergy or not? “Impurity” of titanium implant materials. Health, 2010; 2 (4): 306–310.
6.
VijayaraghavanV, SabaneAV, TejasK. Hypersensitivity to titanium: a less explored area of research. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2012; 12 (4): 201–207.
7.
HallabN.Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopedic implants. J Clin Rheumatol, 2001; 7 (4): 215–218.
8.
GranchiD, CenniE, TrisolinoG, et al.Sensitivity to implant materials in patients undergoing total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2006; 77B: 257–264.
9.
WarshawEM, BelsitoDV, TaylorJS, et al.North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2009 to 2010. Dermatitis, 2013; 24: 50–59.
10.
SchäferT, BohlerE, RuhdorferS, et al.Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy, 2001; 56: 1192–1196.
11.
WarshawEM, Kingsley-LosoJL, DeKovenJG, et al.Body piercing and metal allergic contact sensitivity: North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2007 to 2010. Dermatitis. 2014; 25: 255–264.
12.
HolgersKM, RoupeG, TjellstromA, et al.Clinical, immunological and bacteriological evaluation of adverse reactions to skin-penetrating titanium implants in the head and neck region. Contact Dermatitis, 1992; 27: 1–7.
13.
HallabNJ, CaicedoM, FinneganA, et al.TH1 type lymphocyte reactivity to metals in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg, 2008; 3: 6.
14.
ThomasP, SummerB, SanderCA, et al.Intolerance of osteosynthesis material: evidence of dichromate contact allergy with concomitant oligoclonal T-cell infiltrate and TH1-type cytokine expression in the peri-implantar tissue. Allergy, 2000; 55: 969–972.
15.
SummerB, PaulC, MazoochianF, et al.Nickel (Ni) allergic patients with complications to Ni containing joint replacement show preferential IL-17 type reactivity to Ni. Contact Dermatitis. 2010; 63: 15–22.
16.
AquinoM, MucciT. Systemic contact dermatitis and allergy to biomedical devices. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, 2013; 13: 518–527.
17.
Basko-PlluskaJL, ThyssenJP, SchalockPC. Cutaneous and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants. Dermatitis, 2011; 22 (2): 65–79.
18.
MerrittK, RodrigoJJ. Immune response to synthetic materials: sensitization of patients receiving orthopaedic implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 326: 71–79.
19.
SadriehN, WokovichAM, GopeeNV, et al.Lack of significant dermal penetration of titanium dioxide from sunscreen formulations containing nano- and submicron-size TiO2 particles. Toxicol Sci, 2010; 115 (1): 156–166.
20.
PinheiroT, PallonJ, AlvesLC, et al.The influence of corneocyte structure on the interpretation of permeation profiles of nanoparticles across skin. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res B, 2007; 260 (1): 119–123.
21.
CadoschD, ChanE, GautschiOP, et al.Metal is not inert: role of metal ions released by biocorrosion in aseptic loosening—current concepts. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009; 91A: 1252–1262.
22.
BozinniB, CarlinoP, UrzoLD, et al.An electrochemical impedance investigation of the behavior of anodically oxidized titanium in human plasma and cognate fluids, relevant to dental applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2008; 19: 3443–3453.
23.
MartinSF.T lymphocyte-mediated immune responses to chemical haptens and metal ions: implications for allergic and autoimmune disease. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 2004; 134: 186–198.
24.
MessoriL, OrioliP, BanholzerV, et al.Formation of titanium(IV)-transferrin by reaction of human serum apotransferrin with titanium complexes. FEBS Lett, 1999; 442: 157–161.
25.
TinocoAD, EamesEV, ValentineAM. Reconsideration of serum Ti(IV) transport: albumin and transferrin trafficking of Ti(IV) and its complexes. J Am Chem Soc, 2008; 130: 2262–2270.
26.
UrbanRM, JacobsJJ, TomlinsonMJ, et al.Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2000; 82: 457–476.
27.
LalorPA, RevellPA, GrayAB, et al.Sensitivity to titanium: a cause of implant failure?. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1991; 73B: 25–28.
28.
HedenborgM.Titanium dioxide induced chemiluminescence of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 1988; 61 (1–2): 1–6.
29.
KumazawaR, WatariF, TakashiN, et al.Effects of Ti ions and particles on neutrophil function and morphology. Biomaterials, 2002; 23: 3757–3764.
30.
VoggenreiterG, LeithingS, BrauerH, et al.Immuno-inflammatory tissue reaction to stainless-steel and titanium plates used for internal fixation of long bones. Biomaterials, 2003; 24: 247–254.
31.
BiY, Van De MotterRR, RagabAA, et al.Titanium particles stimulate bone resorption by inducing differentiation of murine osteoclasts. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001; 83: 501–508.
32.
CadoschD, ChanE, GautschiOP, et al.Titanium IV ions induced human osteoclast differentiation and enhanced bone resorption in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2009; 91: 29–36.
33.
KatouF, AndohN, MotegiK, et al.Immuno-inflammatory responses in the tissue adjacent to titanium miniplates used in the treatment of mandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 1996; 24 (3): 155–162.
34.
FriskenKW, DandieGW, LugowskiS, et al.A study of titanium release into body organs following the insertion of single threaded screw implants into the mandibles of sheep. Aust Dent J, 2002; 47 (3): 214–217.
35.
SchliephakeH, LehmannH, KunzU, et al.Ultrastructural findings in soft tissues adjacent to titanium plates used in jaw fracture treatment. Int J Oral Maxollofac Surg, 1993; 22: 20–25.
36.
ThewesM, KretschmerR, GfesserM, et al.Immunohistochemical characterization of the perivascular infiltrate cells in tissues adjacent to stainless steel implants compared with titanium implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2001; 121: 223–226.
37.
ScalesJT.Black staining around titanium alloy prostheses—an orthopaedic enigma. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1991; 73 (4): 534–536.
38.
WittJD, SwannM. Metal wear and tissue response in failed titanium alloy total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1991; 73: 559–563
39.
KonttinenYT, ZhaoD, BeklenA, et al.The microenvironment around total hip replacement prostheses. Clinical Orthopaedic Related Research, 2005; 430: 28–38.
40.
OnoderaK, OoyaK, KawamuraH. Titanium lymph node pigmentation in the reconstruction plate system of a mandibular bone defect. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1993; 75: 495–497.
41.
WeingartD, SteinemannS, SchilliW, et al.Titanium deposition in regional lymph nodes after insertion of titanium screw implants in maxillofacial region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1994; 23: 450–452.
BilhanH, BilginT, CakirAF, et al.The effect of mucine, IgA, urea, and lysozyme on the corrosion behavior of various non-precious dental alloys and pure titanium in artificial saliva. J Biomater Appl, 2007; 22: 197–221.
44.
JacobsJJ, SilvertonC, HallabNJ, et al.Metal release and excretion from cementless titanium alloy total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1999; (358): 173–180.
45.
JacobsJJ, SkiporMS, BlackJ, et al.Release and excretion of metal in patients who have a total hip-replacement component made of titanium-base alloy. J Bone Joint Surg, 1991; 73-A (10): 1475–1486.
46.
LeopoldSS, BergerRA, PattersonL, et al.Serum titanium level for diagnosis of a failed, metal-backed patellar component. J Arthroplasty, 2000; 15: 938–943.
47.
HallabNJ, AndersonS, CaicedoM, et al.Immune responses correlate with serum-metal in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2004; 19: 88–93.
48.
SchalockPC, DunnickCA, NedorostS, et al.American Contact Dermatitis Society core allergen series. Dermatitis, 2013; 24 (1): 7–9.
49.
UterW, AbererW, Armario-HitaJC, et al.Current patch test results with the European baseline series and extensions to it from the ‘European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy’ network, 2007–2008. Contact Dermatitis, 2012; 67 (1): 9–19.
50.
HonariG, EllisSG, WilkoffBL, et al.Hypersensitivity reactions associated with endovascular devices. Contact Dermatitis, 2008; 59: 7–22.
51.
ReedKB, DavisMD, NakamuraK, et al.Retrospective evaluation of patch testing before or after metal device implantation. Arch Dermatol, 2008; 144 (8): 999–1007.
52.
DavisMDP, WangMZ, YianniasJA, et al.Patch testing with a large series of metal allergens: findings from more than 1,000 patients in one decade at Mayo Clinic. Dermatitis, 2011; 22 (5): 256–271.
53.
LhotkaCG, SzekeresT, Fritzer-SzekeresM, et al.Are allergic reactions to skin clips associated with delayed wound healing?. Am J Surg, 1998; 176 (4): 320–323.
54.
IIjimaR, IkariY, AmiyaE, et al.The impact of metallic allergy on stent implantation: metal allergy and recurrence of in-stent restenosis. Int J Cardiol, 2005; 104: 319–325.
55.
OkamuraT, MorimotoM, FukushimaD, et al.A skin patch test for the diagnosis of titanium allergy. J Dent Res, 1999; 78 (5): 1135.
56.
CancilleriF, DeGiorgisP, VerdoiaC, et al.Allergy to components of total hip arthroplasty before and after surgery. Ital J Orthop Traumatol, 1992; 18 (3): 407–410.
57.
GranchiD, CenniE, TiganiD. Sensitivity to implant materials in patients with total knee arthroplasties. Biomaterials, 2008; 29: 1494–1500.
58.
WatermanAH, SchrikJJ. Allergy in hip arthroplasty. Contact Dermatitis, 1985; 13: 294–301.
59.
FrigeroE, PigattoPD, GuzziG, et al.Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants: a prospective study. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 64: 273–279.
60.
KręciszB, Kieć-ŚwierczyńskaM, Chomiczewska-SkóraD. Allergy to orthopedic metal implants-prospective study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health, 2012; 25 (4): 463–469.
61.
MüllerK, Valentine-ThonE. Hypersensitivity to titanium: clinical and laboratory evidence. Neuroendocrinol Lett, 2006; 27 (suppl 1): 31–35.
62.
VermesC, KuzsnerJ, BárdosT, et al.Prospective analysis of human leukocyte functional tests reveals metal sensitivity in patients with hip implant. J Orthop Surg and Res, 2013; 8: 12.
63.
ElvesMW, WilsonJN, ScalesJT, et al.Incidence of metal sensitivity in patients with total joint replacements. Br Med J, 1975; 4: 376–378.
64.
Milavec-PuretićV, OrlićD, MarusićA. Sensitivity to metals in 40 patients with failed hip endoprosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1998; 117 (6–7): 383–386.
65.
MenezesLM, CamposLC, QuintãoCC, et al.Hypersensitivity to metals in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004; 126 (1): 58–64.
66.
SiciliaA, CuestaS, ComaG, et al.Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008; 19 (8): 823–835.
ThomasP, BraathenLR, DörigM. Increased metal allergy in patients with failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty and peri-implant T-lymphocytic inflammation. Allergy, 2009; 64 (8): 1157–1165.
69.
NewmanMD, StotlandM, EllisJI. Safety of nanosized particles in titanium dioxide– and zinc oxide–based sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2009; 61: 685–692.
70.
BernardS, BaeckM, TennstedtD, et al.Chromate or titanium allergy—the role of impurities?. Contact Dermatitis, 2013; 68 (3): 191–192.
71.
KeaneFM, MorrisSD, SmithHR, et al.Allergy in coronary in-stent restenosis. Lancet, 2001; 357: 1205–1206.
72.
PaulsenSM, NanneyLB, LynchJB. Titanium tetrachloride: an unusual agent with the potential to create severe burns. J Burn Care Rehabil, 1998; 19: 377–381.
ChitkaraDK, McNeelaBJ. Titanium tetrachloride burns to the eye. Br J Ophthalmol, 1992; 76: 380–382.
75.
PetersMS, SchroeterAL, van HaleHM, et al.Pacemaker contact sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis, 1984; 11: 214–218.
76.
StejskalV, DanersundA, LindvallA, et al.Metal-specific lymphocytes: biomarkers of sensitivity in man. Neuroendocrinol Lett, 1999; 20: 289–298.
77.
Valentine-ThonE, SchiwaraH-W. Validity of MELISA® for metal sensitivity testing. Neuroendocrinol Lett, 2003; 24 (1/2): 57–64.
78.
StejskalVDM, CederbrantK, LindvallA, et al.MELISA—an in vitro tool for the study of metal allergy. Toxicol In Vitro, 1994; 8: 991–1000.
79.
StejskalV.Human hapten-specific lymphocytes: biomarkers of allergy in man. Drug Inform J, 1997; 31: 1379–1382.
80.
Valentine-ThonE, MüllerK, GuzziG, et al.LTT-MELISA® is clinically relevant for detecting and monitoring metal sensitivity. Neuroendocrinol Lett, 2006; 27 (suppl 1): 17–24.
81.
HallabNJ, MikeczK, JoshuaJJ. A triple assay technique for the evaluation of metal-induced delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in patients with or receiving total joint arthroplasty. Biomed Mater Res, 2000; (Appl Biometer)53: 480–489.
82.
HallabNJ, AndersonS, StaffordT, et al.Lymphocyte responses in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res, 2005; 23: 384–391.
83.
ThomasP, IglhautG, WollenbergA, et al.Allergy or tolerance: reduced inflammatory cytokine response and concomitant IL-10 production of lymphocytes and monocytes in symptom-free titanium dental implant patients. BioMed Res Int, 2013; 2013:539834
84.
CarandoS, CannasM, RossiP, et al.The lymphocytic transformation test (L.T.T.) in the evaluation of intolerance in prosthetic implants. Ital J Orthop Traumatol, 1985; 11: 475–481.
85.
CederbrantK, HultmanP, MarcussonJA, et al.In vitro lymphocyte proliferation as compared to patch test using gold, palladium and nickel. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 1997; 112: 212–217.
86.
MerrittK, BrownSA. Metal sensitivity reactions to orthopedic implants. Int J Dermatol Mar, 1981; 20 (2): 89–94.
87.
HerbstRA, LauermaAI, MaibachHI. Intradermal testing in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis: a reappraisal. Contact Dermatitis, 1993; 29: 1–5.
88.
OmuraY.New simple early diagnostic methods using Omura’s “bi-digital O-ring dysfunction localization method” and acupuncture organ representation points, and their applications to the “drug & food compatibility test” for individual organs and to auricular diagnosis of internal organs-part I. Acupunct Electrother Res, 1981; 6: 239–254.
89.
TamaiK, MitsumoriM, FujishiroS, et al.A case of allergic reaction to surgical metal clips inserted for postoperative boost irradiation in a patient undergoing breast-conserving therapy. Breast Cancer, 2001; 8 (1): 90–92.
AbdallahHI, BalsaraRK, O’RiordanAC. Pacemaker contact sensitivity: clinical recognition and management. Ann Thorac Surg, 1994; 57 (4): 1017–1018.
95.
VirabenR, BoulinquezS, AlbaC. Granulomatous dermatitis after implantation of a titanium-containing pacemaker. Contact Dermatitis, 1995; 33 (6): 437.
96.
IshiiK, KodaniE, MiyamotoS, et al.Pacemaker contact dermatitis: the effective use of a polytetrafluoroethylene sheet. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2006; 29: 1299–1302.
97.
SyburraT, SchurrU, RahnM, et al.Gold-coated pacemaker implantation after allergic reactions to pacemaker compounds. Europace, 2010; 12 (5): 749–750.
98.
MitchellDL, SynnottSA, VanDercreekJA. Tissue reaction involving an intraoral skin graft and CP titanium abutments: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1990; 5 (1): 79–84.
99.
du PreezLA, BütowKW, SwartTJP. Implant failure due to titanium hypersensitivity/allergy? Report of a case. SADJ, 2007; 62 (1): 22–25.
100.
EgusaH, KoN, ShimazuT, et al.Suspected association of an allergic reaction with titanium dental implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent, 2008; 100 (5): 344–347.
101.
ThomasP, BandlWD, MaierS, et al.Hypersensitivity to titanium osteosynthesis with impaired fracture healing, eczema, and T-cell hyperresponsiveness in vitro: case report and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis, 2006; 55: 199–202.
102.
OpstalNV, VerheydenF. Revision of a tibial baseplate using a customized oxinium component in a case of suspected metal allergy: a case report. Acta Orthop Belg, 2011; 77: 691–695.
103.
GotoM, GotohM, MitsuiY, et al.Hypersensitivity to suture anchors. Case Rep Orthop, 2013; 2013: 932167.
104.
NawazF, WallBM. Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: suspected association with titanium bioprosthesis. Am J Med Sci, 2007; 334 (3): 215–218.
105.
HettigeS, NorrisJS. Mortality after local allergic response to titanium cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir, 2012; 154: 1725–1726.
106.
RedlineS, BarnaB, TomashefskiJF, et al.Granulomatous disease associated with pulmonary deposition of titanium. Br J Ind Med, 1986; 43: 652–656.
107.
HighWA, AyersRA, AdamsJR, et al.Granulomatous reaction to titanium alloy: an unusual reaction to ear piercing. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2006; 55 (4): 716–720.
108.
BelohlavekJ, BelohlavkovaS, HlubockyJ, et al.Severe allergic dermatitis after closure of foramen ovale with Amplatzer occlude. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013; 96: e57–e59.
109.
SiddiqiA, PayneAG, DeSilvaRK, et al.Titanium allergy: could it affect dental implant integration?. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011; 22 (7): 673–680.
110.
DeasDE, MikotowiczJJ, MackeySA, et al.Implant failure with spontaneous rapid exfoliation: case reports. Implant Dent, 2002; 11 (3): 235–242.
111.
BilhanH, BuralC, GeckiliO. Titanium hypersensitivity: a hidden threat for dental implants?. N Y State Dent J, 2013; 79 (4): 38–43.
112.
ChaturvediTP.Allergy related to dental implant and its significance. Clin Cosmet Invest Dent, 2013; 5: 57–61
113.
KellerCA, FrostA, CaglePT, et al.Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in a painter with elevated pulmonary concentrations of titanium. Chest, 1995; 108 (1): 277–280.
114.
HumbleS, TuckerJA, BoudreauxC, et al.Titanium particles identified by energy-dispersive x-ray microanalysis within the lungs of a painter at autopsy. Ultrastruct Pathol, 2003; 27: 127–129.
115.
TilsleyDA, RotsteinH. Sensitivity caused by internal exposure to nickel, chrome and cobalt. Contact Dermatitis, 1980; 6: 175–178.
ThomasP, ThomasM, SummerB, et al.Impaired wound-healing, local eczema, and chronic inflammation following titanium osteosynthesis in a nickel and cobalt-allergic patient. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011; 93: e61(1–5).
120.
LimH-P, LeeK-M, KohY-I, et al.Allergic contact stomatitis caused by a titanium nitride-coated implant abutment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent, 2012; 108: 209–213.
121.
CoulterI, LeeM, ZakariaR, et al.Pin site allergic contact dermatitis: an unusual complication of halo fixation. Br J Neurosurg, 2012; 26 (4): 566–567.
122.
OlivaX, OlivaJ, OlivaJD. Full-mouth oral rehabilitation in a titanium allergy patient using zirconium oxide dental implants and zirconium oxide restorations: a case report from an ongoing clinical study. Eur J Esthet Dent, 2010; 5 (2): 190–203.
123.
PastidesP, Chimutengwende GordonM, MaffuliN, et al.Stem cell therapy for human cartilage defects: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2013; 21: 646–654.
124.
PeetersCMM, LeijsMJC, ReijmanM, et al.Safety of intra-articular cell-therapy with culture-expanded stem cells in humans: a systematic literature review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2013; 21: 1465–1473.
125.
www.clinicaltrials.gov [database online]. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine; February 29, 2000. Updated daily. Accessed August10, 2014.
126.
ThyssenJP, JakobsenSS, EngkildeK, et al.The association between metal allergy, total hip arthroplasty, and revision. Acta Orthop, 2009; 80: 646–652.
127.
SwiontkowskiMF, AgelJ, SchwappachJ, et al.Cutaneous metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic injuries. J Orthop Trauma, 2001; 15: 86–89.
128.
CrawfordGH.The role of patch testing in the evaluation of orthopedic implant-related adverse effects: current evidence does not support broad use. Dermatitis, 2013; 24: 99–103.
129.
SchalockPC, ThyssenJP. Metal hypersensitivity reactions to implants: opinions and practices of patch testing dermatologists. Dermatitis, 2013; 24 (6): 313–320.
130.
ThomasP, SchuhA, RingJ, et al.Orthopedic surgical implants and allergies: joint statement by the implant allergy working group (AK 20) of the DGOOC (German Association of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery), DKG (German Contact Dermatitis Research Group) and DGAKI (German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology). Orthopade, 2008; 37: 75–88.
131.
RazakA, EbinesanAD, CharalambousCP. Metal allergy screening prior to joint arthroplasty and its influence on implant choice: a Delphi consensus study amongst orthopaedic arthroplasty surgeons. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2013; 25 (4): 186–193.
132.
ThyssenJP, MenneT, SchalockPC, et al.Pragmatic approach to the clinical work-up of patients with putative allergic disease to metallic orthopaedic implants before and after surgery. Br J Dermatol, 2011; 164: 473–478.
133.
SchalockPC, MenneT, JohansenJD, et al.Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants-diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use. Contact Dermatitis, 2011; 66: 4–19.
134.
NikiY, MatsumotoH, OtaniT, et al.Screening for symptomatic metal sensitivity: a prospective study of 92 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Biomaterials, 2005; 26:1019–1026.
