DickersinK, SchererR, LefebvreC, Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. Br Med J1994; 309: 1286–1291.
2.
HarrisonJE, AshbyD, LennonMAAn analysis of papers published in the British and European Journals of Orthodontics. Br J Orthod1996; 23: 203–209.
3.
HaynesRB, MulrowCD, HuithEJ, AltmanDG, GardnerMJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med1990; 113: 69–76.
4.
Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ann Intern Med1987; 106: 598–604.
5.
BeggC, ChoM, EastwoodS, HortonR, MoherD, OlkinI, PitkinR, Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. J Am Med Ass1996; 276:637–639.
6.
ClarkeM, OxmanAD, (Eds). Locating and selecting studies. Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook 4.1.5, [updated April 2002]; Section 5. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2002. Oxford Update Software. Updated quarterly.
7.
EggerM, Davey-SmithG.Meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies. Br Med J1998; 316: 61–66.
8.
LefebvreC, ClarkeMJIdentifying randomized trials. In: EggerM, Davey-SmithG, AltmanDA (Eds) Systematic Reviews in Health Care: meta-analysis in context, 2nd edn. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001.