O'BrienK.Editorial: is evidence-based orthodontics a pipedream?J Orthod2001; 28: 313.
2.
FreedmanBEquipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med1987; 317: 141–145.
3.
KodishE, LantosJD, SieglerMThe ethics of randomization. CA Cancer J Clin1991; 41: 180–186.
4.
FeinsteinARAn additional basic science for clinical medicine: III. The challenges of comparison and measurement. Ann Intern Med1983; 99: 705–712.
5.
BensonK, HartzAJA comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials.N Engl J Med2000; 342: 1878–1886.
6.
ConcatoJ, ShahN, HorwitzRIRandomized controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med2000; 342: 1887–1892.
7.
CassidyDWJr, HerbosaEG, RotskoffKS, JohnstonLEJr.A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in ‘borderline’ Class II, division 1 adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1992; 104: 455–470.
8.
HannapelED, JohnstonLEJr.Extraction vs. non-extraction: PAR-score reduction as a function of initial susceptibility. Prog Orthod2002; 3: 1–5.
9.
JohnstonLEJr.Growth and the Class II patient: rendering unto Caesar. Semin Orthod1998; 4: 59–62.
10.
LivieratosFA, JohnstonLEJr.A comparison of oneand two-stage non-extraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1995; 108: 118–131.
11.
MiettinenOIStratification by a multivariate confounder score. Am J Epidemiol1976; 104: 609–620.
12.
PaquetteDE, BeattieJR, JohnstonLEJr.A long-term comparison of non-extraction and bicuspid-extraction edgewise therapy in ‘borderline’ Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1992; 102: 1–14.
