AntmanE. M., LauJ., KupelnickB., MostellerF. and ChalmersT. C. (1992) A comparison of results of meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and the recommendations of experts, Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 240–248.
2.
BeggC., ChoM., EastwoodS., HortonR., MoherD., OlkinI. (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement, Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 637–639.
3.
British Dental Journal (1999) CONSORT guidelines. Checklist for authors submitting reports of randomised controlled trials to the BDJ, British Dental Journal, 186, 258.
4.
CochraneA. L. (1972) Effectiveness and Efficiency. Random Reflections on Health Services, Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust, London.
5.
DickersinK. (1990) The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence, Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 1385–1389.
6.
DickersinK., MinY-I. and MeinertC. L (1992) Factors influencing publication of research results, Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 374–378.
7.
DickersinK., SchererR. and LefebvreC. (1994) Identifying relevant studies for systematic review, British Medical Journal, 309, 1286–1291.
8.
EasterbrookP. J. (1991) Publication bias in clinical research, Lancet, 337, 867–872.
9.
GlanvilleJ., HainesM. and AustonI. (1998) Getting research findings into practice: finding information on clinical practice, British Medical Journal, 317, 200–203.
10.
GreenhalghT. (1997) How to Read a Paper: the Basis of Evidence Based Medicine, BMJ Publishing Group, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR.
11.
HarrisonJ. E., AshbyD. and LennonM. A. (1996) An analysis of papers published in the British and European journals of orthodontics, British Journal of Orthodontics, 23, 203–209.
12.
HuntD. L. and McKibbonK. A. (1997) Locating and appraising systematic reviews, Annals of Internal Medicine, 126, 532–538.
JonesM. L. (1998) Editorial—A new look for 1998, British Journal of Orthodontics, 25, 55–56.
15.
LawrenceA. (1998) Welcome to evidence-based dentistry, Evidence-Based Dentistry, 1, 2–3.
16.
MoherD., FortinP., JadadA. R., (1996) Completeness of reporting trials published in languages other than English: implications for the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews, Lancet, 347, 363–366.
17.
MorganP. P. (1986) Review articles. 2. The literature jungle, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 134, 98–99.
18.
MulrowC. D. (1994) Rationale for systematic reviews, British Medical Journal, 309, 597–599.
19.
NeedlemanI. (1999) CONSORT, British Dental Journal, 186, 207.
20.
NewcombeR. G. (1994) Research in orthodontics—a statistical perspective, British Journal of Orthodontics, 21, 299–302.
21.
RichardsD. (1998) Which journal should you read to keep up to date?Evidence-Based Dentistry, 1, 22–25.
22.
RichardsD. and LawrenceA. (1995) Evidence based dentistry, British Dental Journal, 179, 270–273.
23.
RosenbergW. C. and DonaldA. (1995) Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving, British Medical Journal310, 1122–1126.
24.
SackettD. L., RosenbergW. C., GrayJ. A. M., HaynesR. B. and RichardsonW. S (1996) Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't, British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.
25.
SackettD. L. and HaynesR. B. (1995) On the need for evidence-based medicine, Evidence-Based Medicine, 1, 5–6.
26.
TullochJ. F. C., Antczak-BouckomsA. A. and TuncayO. C (1989) A review of clinical research in orthodontics, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 95, 499–504.